Effects of Conical Positive Expiratory Pressure Mask Application During Exercise Training on Pulmonary Rehabilitation Outcomes in Moderate to Severe COPD Cases: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 1.9 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Pulmonary Medicine Pub Date : 2025-10-31 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/pm/8828987
Chulee Ubolsakka-Jones, David Arthur Jones, Malipron Pukdeechat, Watchara Boonsawat, Wilaiwan Khrisanapant, Pornanan Domthong, Seksan Chaisuksant, Piyaraid Dongkhanti, Aung Aung Nwe, Chatchai Phimphasak
{"title":"Effects of Conical Positive Expiratory Pressure Mask Application During Exercise Training on Pulmonary Rehabilitation Outcomes in Moderate to Severe COPD Cases: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Chulee Ubolsakka-Jones, David Arthur Jones, Malipron Pukdeechat, Watchara Boonsawat, Wilaiwan Khrisanapant, Pornanan Domthong, Seksan Chaisuksant, Piyaraid Dongkhanti, Aung Aung Nwe, Chatchai Phimphasak","doi":"10.1155/pm/8828987","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of positive expiratory pressure (PEP), which includes conical-PEP breathing, has been proposed for use during exercise among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) to reduce dynamic hyperinflation (DH) and improve exercise capacity. However, evidence on the effects of exercise training with conical-PEP for pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) remains limited. This study was conducted to evaluate the aforementioned effects on exercise capacity, DH, and quality of life among patients with moderate to very severe COPD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-two patients with moderate to very severe COPD were assigned to a home-based PR program. They were then randomly allocated to exercise training with conical-PEP (<i>n</i> = 21, age 64.5 ± 6.8 years) or without conical-PEP (control group, <i>n</i> = 21, age 67.2 ± 8.0 years) for 8-10 weeks. The outcomes of the 6-min walk distance (6MWD), the endurance spot marching test (ESMT) for endurance time, an inspiratory capacity (IC) test to assess DH, the transition dyspnea index (TDI), St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), and the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) were recorded at baseline and at the program's end (post-PR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in 6MWD (<i>p</i> = 0.116) or ESMT endurance time (<i>p</i> = 0.247) between the conical-PEP and control groups at post-PR. Compared to baseline, the post-PR measurements showed a significant reduction in end-exercise IC in the control group (<i>Δ</i> -0.08 L, 95% CI: -0.16 to -0.01 L, <i>p</i> = 0.033) but no significant reduction in the conical-PEP group (<i>Δ</i> -0.07 L, 95% CI: -0.19 to 0.05 L, <i>p</i> = 0.193). No significant differences were found between the groups at post-PR in terms of TDI (<i>p</i> = 0.277), SGRQ (<i>p</i> = 0.687), or CAT (<i>p</i> = 0.704) scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The addition of conical-PEP during exercise training for PR in COPD did not provide significant benefits over exercise training without conical-PEP. Further research is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":46434,"journal":{"name":"Pulmonary Medicine","volume":"2025 ","pages":"8828987"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12595236/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pulmonary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/pm/8828987","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The use of positive expiratory pressure (PEP), which includes conical-PEP breathing, has been proposed for use during exercise among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) to reduce dynamic hyperinflation (DH) and improve exercise capacity. However, evidence on the effects of exercise training with conical-PEP for pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) remains limited. This study was conducted to evaluate the aforementioned effects on exercise capacity, DH, and quality of life among patients with moderate to very severe COPD.

Methods: Forty-two patients with moderate to very severe COPD were assigned to a home-based PR program. They were then randomly allocated to exercise training with conical-PEP (n = 21, age 64.5 ± 6.8 years) or without conical-PEP (control group, n = 21, age 67.2 ± 8.0 years) for 8-10 weeks. The outcomes of the 6-min walk distance (6MWD), the endurance spot marching test (ESMT) for endurance time, an inspiratory capacity (IC) test to assess DH, the transition dyspnea index (TDI), St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), and the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) were recorded at baseline and at the program's end (post-PR).

Results: There were no significant differences in 6MWD (p = 0.116) or ESMT endurance time (p = 0.247) between the conical-PEP and control groups at post-PR. Compared to baseline, the post-PR measurements showed a significant reduction in end-exercise IC in the control group (Δ -0.08 L, 95% CI: -0.16 to -0.01 L, p = 0.033) but no significant reduction in the conical-PEP group (Δ -0.07 L, 95% CI: -0.19 to 0.05 L, p = 0.193). No significant differences were found between the groups at post-PR in terms of TDI (p = 0.277), SGRQ (p = 0.687), or CAT (p = 0.704) scores.

Conclusion: The addition of conical-PEP during exercise training for PR in COPD did not provide significant benefits over exercise training without conical-PEP. Further research is warranted.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

运动训练中应用锥形呼气正压面罩对中重度COPD患者肺康复效果的影响:一项随机对照试验。
背景:已提出在慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者运动期间使用呼气正压(PEP),包括锥形PEP呼吸,以减少动态恶性通货膨胀(DH)和提高运动能力。然而,关于锥形pep运动训练对肺康复(PR)的影响的证据仍然有限。本研究旨在评估上述对中度至极重度COPD患者运动能力、DH和生活质量的影响。方法:42例中度至极重度COPD患者被分配到一个基于家庭的PR项目。然后将他们随机分为有锥形pep组(n = 21,年龄64.5±6.8岁)和无锥形pep组(对照组,n = 21,年龄67.2±8.0岁),训练时间为8-10周。在基线和项目结束时(pr后)记录6分钟步行距离(6MWD)、耐力点行军测试(ESMT)、评估DH的吸气量(IC)测试、过渡呼吸困难指数(TDI)、圣乔治呼吸问卷(SGRQ)和COPD评估测试(CAT)的结果。结果:在pr后,锥形pep组与对照组的6MWD (p = 0.116)和ESMT耐力时间(p = 0.247)无显著差异。与基线相比,pr后测量显示对照组运动末期IC显著降低(Δ -0.08 L, 95% CI: -0.16至-0.01 L, p = 0.033),但锥形pep组无显著降低(Δ -0.07 L, 95% CI: -0.19至0.05 L, p = 0.193)。术后两组间TDI (p = 0.277)、SGRQ (p = 0.687)、CAT (p = 0.704)评分均无显著差异。结论:在COPD患者PR的运动训练中加入锥形pep并不比不加锥形pep的运动训练有明显的益处。进一步的研究是有必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pulmonary Medicine
Pulmonary Medicine RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书