Use of a Cytobrush for Sampling the Ear Canal of Dogs With Otitis Externa.

IF 1.8 3区 农林科学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Veterinary dermatology Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-10 DOI:10.1111/vde.70036
Nicoly Radaeli Atanasio, Gabriela Reis Ledur, Danilo Marcondes Filho, Daniel Guimarães Gerardi
{"title":"Use of a Cytobrush for Sampling the Ear Canal of Dogs With Otitis Externa.","authors":"Nicoly Radaeli Atanasio, Gabriela Reis Ledur, Danilo Marcondes Filho, Daniel Guimarães Gerardi","doi":"10.1111/vde.70036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cytological examination of the ear canal is essential for evaluating dogs with otitis externa (OE). The conventional sampling method uses a swab. However, the cytobrush (gynaecological cervical brush), already used for cytological collection from other anatomical sites, has not been adequately investigated for this purpose in dogs with OE.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the cytobrush as a sampling tool for the ear canal of dogs with OE and compare it with the swab technique.</p><p><strong>Animals: </strong>Thirty ears from 17 dogs with OE, presented at a veterinary teaching hospital, were included for sampling.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Cytological samples were collected using both a cytobrush and a swab in random order. Two independent and blinded evaluators quantified micro-organisms (cocci, bacilli, yeasts), mononuclear cells, polymorphonuclear cells and epithelial cells. Animal discomfort during sampling was assessed using a scoring system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were found between the methods regarding the presence of micro-organisms or inflammatory and epithelial cells (p > 0.05), indicating equivalence between techniques. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC > 0.9) demonstrated high reproducibility between evaluators. Although the oto-podal reflex was more frequent with the cytobrush, it did not significantly impact overall animal discomfort.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical relevance: </strong>The cytobrush is an effective, safe and well-tolerated sampling method, and may be considered a viable alternative to the swab for collecting samples from the ear canal of dogs with OE.</p>","PeriodicalId":23599,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary dermatology","volume":" ","pages":"227-235"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12967878/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/vde.70036","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cytological examination of the ear canal is essential for evaluating dogs with otitis externa (OE). The conventional sampling method uses a swab. However, the cytobrush (gynaecological cervical brush), already used for cytological collection from other anatomical sites, has not been adequately investigated for this purpose in dogs with OE.

Objectives: To compare the cytobrush as a sampling tool for the ear canal of dogs with OE and compare it with the swab technique.

Animals: Thirty ears from 17 dogs with OE, presented at a veterinary teaching hospital, were included for sampling.

Materials and methods: Cytological samples were collected using both a cytobrush and a swab in random order. Two independent and blinded evaluators quantified micro-organisms (cocci, bacilli, yeasts), mononuclear cells, polymorphonuclear cells and epithelial cells. Animal discomfort during sampling was assessed using a scoring system.

Results: No significant differences were found between the methods regarding the presence of micro-organisms or inflammatory and epithelial cells (p > 0.05), indicating equivalence between techniques. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC > 0.9) demonstrated high reproducibility between evaluators. Although the oto-podal reflex was more frequent with the cytobrush, it did not significantly impact overall animal discomfort.

Conclusions and clinical relevance: The cytobrush is an effective, safe and well-tolerated sampling method, and may be considered a viable alternative to the swab for collecting samples from the ear canal of dogs with OE.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

细胞刷在外耳炎犬耳道取样中的应用。
背景:耳道细胞学检查是评估犬外耳炎(OE)的必要条件。传统的取样方法使用棉签。然而,细胞刷(妇科宫颈刷)已经用于其他解剖部位的细胞学收集,尚未在OE犬中进行充分的研究。目的:比较细胞刷法在OE犬耳道取样中的应用,并与棉签法进行比较。动物:选取了在兽医教学医院就诊的17只患OE的狗的30只耳朵作为样本。材料和方法:采用细胞刷和棉签随机采集细胞学样本。两个独立的盲法评估者量化了微生物(球菌、杆菌、酵母)、单核细胞、多形核细胞和上皮细胞。使用评分系统评估取样过程中动物的不适。结果:两种方法在微生物或炎症和上皮细胞的存在方面无显著差异(p > 0.05),表明两种技术之间具有等效性。类内相关系数(ICC > 0.9)显示了评价者之间的高重复性。虽然细胞刷的耳足反射更频繁,但它对动物的整体不适没有显著影响。结论及临床意义:细胞刷是一种有效、安全且耐受性良好的取样方法,可作为拭子法的可行替代方法用于OE犬耳道取样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Veterinary dermatology
Veterinary dermatology 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
21.40%
发文量
92
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Veterinary Dermatology is a bi-monthly, peer-reviewed, international journal which publishes papers on all aspects of the skin of mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians and fish. Scientific research papers, clinical case reports and reviews covering the following aspects of dermatology will be considered for publication: -Skin structure (anatomy, histology, ultrastructure) -Skin function (physiology, biochemistry, pharmacology, immunology, genetics) -Skin microbiology and parasitology -Dermatopathology -Pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of skin diseases -New disease entities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书