[Mathematical Tools for Prioritizing Health Technologies: Focus on Implementing Multicriteria Decision Analysis Models].

Q4 Medicine
D A Andreev
{"title":"[Mathematical Tools for Prioritizing Health Technologies: Focus on Implementing Multicriteria Decision Analysis Models].","authors":"D A Andreev","doi":"10.32687/0869-866X-2025-33-s2-1005-1010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>MCDA (Multicriteria Decision Analysis methods) allow for a comprehensive assessment of healthcare technologies based on diverse criteria. The study analyzes the main MCDA methods and the specifics of their application for prioritizing medical technologies. The materials are obtained from the PubMed database and the Google system. A generalized MCDA algorithm is presented, and frequently used models are highlighted: the weighted sum method (WSM), the theory of multicriteria utility (MAUT), and the analytical hierarchical process (AHP). The MCDA support software tools are considered. Special attention is paid to promising hybrid methods (AHP-TOPSIS) and models for dealing with uncertainties (fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS). Effective implementation of MCDA requires the development of medical informatics, but the key role belongs to the human factor - experts who determine the analysis strategy, the quality of the source data and the interpretation of the results. Automated systems and artificial intelligence need mandatory monitoring and validation by specialists when used for management decisions in healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":35946,"journal":{"name":"Problemy sotsial''noi gigieny i istoriia meditsiny / NII sotsial''noi gigieny, ekonomiki i upravleniia zdravookhraneniem im. N.A. Semashko RAMN, AO ''Assotsiatsiia ''Meditsinskaia literatura''","volume":"33 0","pages":"1005-1010"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Problemy sotsial''noi gigieny i istoriia meditsiny / NII sotsial''noi gigieny, ekonomiki i upravleniia zdravookhraneniem im. N.A. Semashko RAMN, AO ''Assotsiatsiia ''Meditsinskaia literatura''","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32687/0869-866X-2025-33-s2-1005-1010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

MCDA (Multicriteria Decision Analysis methods) allow for a comprehensive assessment of healthcare technologies based on diverse criteria. The study analyzes the main MCDA methods and the specifics of their application for prioritizing medical technologies. The materials are obtained from the PubMed database and the Google system. A generalized MCDA algorithm is presented, and frequently used models are highlighted: the weighted sum method (WSM), the theory of multicriteria utility (MAUT), and the analytical hierarchical process (AHP). The MCDA support software tools are considered. Special attention is paid to promising hybrid methods (AHP-TOPSIS) and models for dealing with uncertainties (fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS). Effective implementation of MCDA requires the development of medical informatics, but the key role belongs to the human factor - experts who determine the analysis strategy, the quality of the source data and the interpretation of the results. Automated systems and artificial intelligence need mandatory monitoring and validation by specialists when used for management decisions in healthcare.

[确定卫生技术优先次序的数学工具:侧重于实施多标准决策分析模型]。
MCDA(多标准决策分析方法)允许基于不同标准对医疗保健技术进行全面评估。本研究分析了主要的MCDA方法及其应用于优先医疗技术的具体情况。资料来源于PubMed数据库和谷歌系统。提出了一种广义的MCDA算法,重点介绍了常用的模型:加权和法(WSM)、多准则效用理论(MAUT)和层次分析法(AHP)。考虑MCDA支持软件工具。特别关注了有前途的混合方法(AHP-TOPSIS)和处理不确定性的模型(模糊AHP和TOPSIS)。MCDA的有效实施需要医学信息学的发展,但关键作用属于人的因素——决定分析策略、源数据质量和结果解释的专家。当用于医疗保健管理决策时,自动化系统和人工智能需要专家的强制监控和验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
234
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书