Post-marketing surveillance of tofacitinib in patients with ulcerative colitis in Japan: a post hoc analysis of safety and effectiveness in older (≥65 years) and younger (<65 years) patients.

IF 4.7 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Intestinal Research Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-10 DOI:10.5217/ir.2025.00058
Katsuyoshi Matsuoka, Takayuki Yamamoto, Minoru Matsuura, Toshimitsu Fujii, Shoko Arai, Yutaka Endo, Keiko Sato, Hirotoshi Yuasa, Yasushi Mizuno, Yuki Kobayashi, Tadakazu Hisamatsu
{"title":"Post-marketing surveillance of tofacitinib in patients with ulcerative colitis in Japan: a post hoc analysis of safety and effectiveness in older (≥65 years) and younger (<65 years) patients.","authors":"Katsuyoshi Matsuoka, Takayuki Yamamoto, Minoru Matsuura, Toshimitsu Fujii, Shoko Arai, Yutaka Endo, Keiko Sato, Hirotoshi Yuasa, Yasushi Mizuno, Yuki Kobayashi, Tadakazu Hisamatsu","doi":"10.5217/ir.2025.00058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>To assess, post hoc, tofacitinib safety/effectiveness in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), stratified by age, using data from a 60-week post-marketing surveillance (PMS) study in Japan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients with UC receiving tofacitinib in Japan were enrolled in a large PMS study. Incidence proportions of adverse events (AEs), incidence rates (IRs; unique patients with events/100 patient-years of exposure) of clinically important AEs, reasons for discontinuation, and partial Mayo score clinical remission, stratified by age ( ≥ 65 and < 65 years), were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included 212 older ( ≥ 65 years) and 1,770 younger ( < 65 years) patients. Demographics and baseline disease characteristics were generally similar between groups; however, more older versus younger patients had cardiovascular disease (23.1% vs. 4.6%). Incidence proportions of AEs were comparable between groups, but IRs (95% confidence intervals) in older versus younger patients were numerically higher for herpes zoster (9.81 [5.72-15.71] vs. 5.44 [4.28-6.82]), and higher for serious infections (4.45 [1.92-8.76] vs. 1.14 [0.65-1.85]). More older versus younger patients discontinued due to AEs (28.6% vs. 17.6%); more younger versus older patients discontinued due to insufficient clinical responses (50.3% vs. 35.2%). Clinical remission rates through 60 weeks were generally similar between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Older patients had higher IRs of herpes zoster and serious infection than younger patients, although tofacitinib effectiveness was similar between age groups. Discontinuation due to AEs was more common in older patients. Despite the smaller sample size of older versus younger patients, a focused evaluation of older patients is of benefit.</p>","PeriodicalId":14481,"journal":{"name":"Intestinal Research","volume":" ","pages":"214-224"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13153857/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intestinal Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2025.00058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aims: To assess, post hoc, tofacitinib safety/effectiveness in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), stratified by age, using data from a 60-week post-marketing surveillance (PMS) study in Japan.

Methods: All patients with UC receiving tofacitinib in Japan were enrolled in a large PMS study. Incidence proportions of adverse events (AEs), incidence rates (IRs; unique patients with events/100 patient-years of exposure) of clinically important AEs, reasons for discontinuation, and partial Mayo score clinical remission, stratified by age ( ≥ 65 and < 65 years), were evaluated.

Results: The analysis included 212 older ( ≥ 65 years) and 1,770 younger ( < 65 years) patients. Demographics and baseline disease characteristics were generally similar between groups; however, more older versus younger patients had cardiovascular disease (23.1% vs. 4.6%). Incidence proportions of AEs were comparable between groups, but IRs (95% confidence intervals) in older versus younger patients were numerically higher for herpes zoster (9.81 [5.72-15.71] vs. 5.44 [4.28-6.82]), and higher for serious infections (4.45 [1.92-8.76] vs. 1.14 [0.65-1.85]). More older versus younger patients discontinued due to AEs (28.6% vs. 17.6%); more younger versus older patients discontinued due to insufficient clinical responses (50.3% vs. 35.2%). Clinical remission rates through 60 weeks were generally similar between groups.

Conclusions: Older patients had higher IRs of herpes zoster and serious infection than younger patients, although tofacitinib effectiveness was similar between age groups. Discontinuation due to AEs was more common in older patients. Despite the smaller sample size of older versus younger patients, a focused evaluation of older patients is of benefit.

托法替尼在日本溃疡性结肠炎患者的上市后监测:老年(≥65岁)和年轻(<65岁)患者的安全性和有效性的事后分析
背景/目的:利用日本一项60周上市后监测(PMS)研究的数据,评估托法替尼在溃疡性结肠炎(UC)患者中按年龄分层的事后安全性/有效性。方法:所有在日本接受托法替尼治疗的UC患者都被纳入了一项大型经前症候群研究。不良事件的发生率(ae),临床重要ae的发生率(IRs;事件发生率的独特患者/100患者-年暴露),停药原因和部分Mayo评分临床缓解,按年龄(≥65岁和< 65岁)分层进行评估。结果:分析包括212例老年(≥65岁)和1770例年轻(< 65岁)患者。组间人口统计学和基线疾病特征大致相似;然而,老年患者患心血管疾病的比例高于年轻患者(23.1%对4.6%)。各组间ae的发生率相当,但带状疱疹老年患者的ir(95%可信区间)高于年轻患者(9.81[5.72-15.71]比5.44[4.28-6.82]),严重感染患者的ir更高(4.45[1.92-8.76]比1.14[0.65-1.85])。由于不良事件而停药的老年患者多于年轻患者(28.6%对17.6%);由于临床反应不足而停止治疗的年轻患者多于老年患者(50.3%对35.2%)。60周的临床缓解率在两组之间大致相似。结论:老年患者的带状疱疹和严重感染的IRs高于年轻患者,尽管托法替尼的有效性在年龄组之间相似。由于不良反应而停药在老年患者中更为常见。尽管老年患者的样本量比年轻患者小,但对老年患者进行集中评估是有益的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Intestinal Research
Intestinal Research GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
10.20%
发文量
69
审稿时长
38 weeks
期刊介绍: Intestinal Research (Intest Res) is the joint official publication of the Asian Organization for Crohn''s and Colitis (AOCC), Chinese Society of IBD (CSIBD), Japanese Society for IBD (JSIBD), Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases (KASID), Taiwan Society of IBD (TSIBD) and Colitis Crohn''s Foundation (India) (CCF, india). The aim of the Journal is to provide broad and in-depth analysis of intestinal diseases, especially inflammatory bowel disease, which shows increasing tendency and significance. As a Journal specialized in clinical and translational research in gastroenterology, it encompasses multiple aspects of diseases originated from the small and large intestines. The Journal also seeks to propagate and exchange useful innovations, both in ideas and in practice, within the research community. As a mode of scholarly communication, it encourages scientific investigation through the rigorous peer-review system and constitutes a qualified and continual platform for sharing studies of researchers and practitioners. Specifically, the Journal presents up-to-date coverage of medical researches on the physiology, epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical presentations, and therapeutic interventions of the intestinal diseases. General topics of interest include inflammatory bowel disease, colon and small intestine cancer or polyp, endoscopy, irritable bowel syndrome and other motility disorders, infectious enterocolitis, intestinal tuberculosis, and so forth. The Journal publishes diverse types of academic materials such as editorials, clinical and basic reviews, original articles, case reports, letters to the editor, brief communications, perspective, statement or commentary, and images that are useful to clinicians and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书