Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Review of Short- and Long-Term Outcomes.

IF 0.8 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
International Journal of Angiology Pub Date : 2025-07-29 eCollection Date: 2025-12-01 DOI:10.1055/a-2655-2479
Adekemi Adeyemi, Lorin Berman, Mark Staroselsky, Dessiree Cordero, Ofek Hai, Amgad N Makaryus, Roman Zeltser
{"title":"Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Review of Short- and Long-Term Outcomes.","authors":"Adekemi Adeyemi, Lorin Berman, Mark Staroselsky, Dessiree Cordero, Ofek Hai, Amgad N Makaryus, Roman Zeltser","doi":"10.1055/a-2655-2479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains a cornerstone in the management of complex coronary artery disease (CAD), offering significant improvements in both survival and quality of life. This review evaluates the short- and long-term outcomes associated with CABG. Despite its benefits, CABG carries perioperative complications, including atrial fibrillation, acute kidney injury, stroke, and surgical site infection. While early mortality rates, including in-hospital and 30-day outcomes, are comparable to those observed with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), long-term data often favor CABG in specific patient populations. Multiple studies have demonstrated superior long-term survival with CABG over PCI in patients with multivessel disease, left main CAD, and comorbid conditions such as diabetes mellitus. Perioperative morbidity and mortality are significantly influenced by patient-specific risk factors, such as advanced age, female sex, reduced ejection fraction, and elevated biomarkers (e.g., troponin, NT-proBNP, C-reactive protein). Since its introduction in the 1960s, CABG techniques have evolved with off-pump and minimally invasive approaches offering reduced hospital length of stay, shorter intensive care unit duration, and lower transfusion requirements, while maintaining comparable safety and efficacy to conventional on-pump surgery. In addition, graft selection is an important determinant of long-term success of CABG. In conclusion, CABG continues to be a highly effective revascularization strategy. Surgical technique, graft type, and careful patient selection remain essential to optimizing both perioperative safety and long-term outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":13798,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Angiology","volume":"34 4","pages":"296-302"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12591714/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Angiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2655-2479","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains a cornerstone in the management of complex coronary artery disease (CAD), offering significant improvements in both survival and quality of life. This review evaluates the short- and long-term outcomes associated with CABG. Despite its benefits, CABG carries perioperative complications, including atrial fibrillation, acute kidney injury, stroke, and surgical site infection. While early mortality rates, including in-hospital and 30-day outcomes, are comparable to those observed with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), long-term data often favor CABG in specific patient populations. Multiple studies have demonstrated superior long-term survival with CABG over PCI in patients with multivessel disease, left main CAD, and comorbid conditions such as diabetes mellitus. Perioperative morbidity and mortality are significantly influenced by patient-specific risk factors, such as advanced age, female sex, reduced ejection fraction, and elevated biomarkers (e.g., troponin, NT-proBNP, C-reactive protein). Since its introduction in the 1960s, CABG techniques have evolved with off-pump and minimally invasive approaches offering reduced hospital length of stay, shorter intensive care unit duration, and lower transfusion requirements, while maintaining comparable safety and efficacy to conventional on-pump surgery. In addition, graft selection is an important determinant of long-term success of CABG. In conclusion, CABG continues to be a highly effective revascularization strategy. Surgical technique, graft type, and careful patient selection remain essential to optimizing both perioperative safety and long-term outcome.

冠状动脉旁路移植术:短期和长期结果的回顾。
冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)仍然是复杂冠状动脉疾病(CAD)治疗的基石,可以显著改善患者的生存和生活质量。本综述评估了与冠脉搭桥相关的短期和长期结果。尽管有益处,但CABG仍存在围手术期并发症,包括心房颤动、急性肾损伤、中风和手术部位感染。虽然早期死亡率,包括住院和30天的结果,与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)观察到的结果相当,但在特定患者群体中,长期数据通常倾向于冠脉搭桥。多项研究表明,对于患有多血管疾病、左主干CAD和糖尿病等合并症的患者,CABG优于PCI的长期生存率。围手术期发病率和死亡率受患者特异性危险因素的显著影响,如高龄、女性、射血分数降低和生物标志物(如肌钙蛋白、NT-proBNP、c反应蛋白)升高。自20世纪60年代推出以来,冠状动脉搭桥技术已经发展到无泵和微创方法,缩短了住院时间,缩短了重症监护病房的时间,降低了输血需求,同时保持了与传统有泵手术相当的安全性和有效性。此外,移植物选择是CABG长期成功的重要决定因素。总之,冠状动脉搭桥仍然是一种非常有效的血运重建策略。手术技术、移植物类型和谨慎的患者选择仍然是优化围手术期安全性和长期预后的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Angiology
International Journal of Angiology PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
57
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书