Synergistic Gains and National Cultural Distance

Q1 Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Tanveer Hussain, Muhammad Shujahat, Abongeh A. Tunyi, Mehmet Demirbag
{"title":"Synergistic Gains and National Cultural Distance","authors":"Tanveer Hussain,&nbsp;Muhammad Shujahat,&nbsp;Abongeh A. Tunyi,&nbsp;Mehmet Demirbag","doi":"10.1111/fmii.70002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Does national cultural distance create higher synergistic gains in cross-border mergers and acquisitions (CBMAs)? Existing research on the role of cultural distance suggests that cultural disparities destroy shareholders’ wealth. Using an international sample of CBMAs over 19 years, we document that synergistic gains increase by 1.75 percentage points with one standard deviation increase in cultural distance. Drawing from the organizational learning theory, we suggest that learning diverse cultural practices in the post-acquisition stage is a source of higher synergy gains. The positive association between cultural distance and synergies is more pronounced if the acquirer pays in stock and already has takeover experience. This suggests that better awareness of the target country's culture and risk management through stock payment are boundary conditions for higher gains. Overall, our results lead to the counter-intuitive finding that CBMAs between firms from countries with dissimilar cultures are not always valued as destructive but depend on how merging firms learn the cultural practices of one another and manage integration challenges. We offer practical implications for regulators and policymakers about how the international takeover market can serve as a vehicle for learning new cultural practices and increasing combined firm value.</p>","PeriodicalId":39670,"journal":{"name":"Financial Markets, Institutions and Instruments","volume":"34 5","pages":"223-245"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/fmii.70002","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Financial Markets, Institutions and Instruments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fmii.70002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Does national cultural distance create higher synergistic gains in cross-border mergers and acquisitions (CBMAs)? Existing research on the role of cultural distance suggests that cultural disparities destroy shareholders’ wealth. Using an international sample of CBMAs over 19 years, we document that synergistic gains increase by 1.75 percentage points with one standard deviation increase in cultural distance. Drawing from the organizational learning theory, we suggest that learning diverse cultural practices in the post-acquisition stage is a source of higher synergy gains. The positive association between cultural distance and synergies is more pronounced if the acquirer pays in stock and already has takeover experience. This suggests that better awareness of the target country's culture and risk management through stock payment are boundary conditions for higher gains. Overall, our results lead to the counter-intuitive finding that CBMAs between firms from countries with dissimilar cultures are not always valued as destructive but depend on how merging firms learn the cultural practices of one another and manage integration challenges. We offer practical implications for regulators and policymakers about how the international takeover market can serve as a vehicle for learning new cultural practices and increasing combined firm value.

协同收益与国家文化距离
国家文化距离是否会在跨国并购中产生更高的协同收益?现有的关于文化距离作用的研究表明,文化差异破坏了股东的财富。通过19年的国际cbma样本,我们发现文化距离每增加一个标准差,协同收益就会增加1.75个百分点。根据组织学习理论,我们建议在习得后阶段学习不同的文化实践是更高协同收益的来源。文化距离与协同效应之间的正相关关系在收购方以股票支付且已有收购经验的情况下更为明显。这表明,通过股票支付更好地了解目标国家的文化和风险管理是获得更高收益的边界条件。总的来说,我们的结果导致了一个反直觉的发现,即来自不同文化国家的公司之间的cbma并不总是被视为破坏性的,而是取决于合并公司如何学习彼此的文化实践并管理整合挑战。我们为监管机构和政策制定者提供了有关国际收购市场如何成为学习新文化实践和增加合并公司价值的工具的实际建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Financial Markets, Institutions and Instruments
Financial Markets, Institutions and Instruments Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Financial Markets, Institutions and Instruments bridges the gap between the academic and professional finance communities. With contributions from leading academics, as well as practitioners from organizations such as the SEC and the Federal Reserve, the journal is equally relevant to both groups. Each issue is devoted to a single topic, which is examined in depth, and a special fifth issue is published annually highlighting the most significant developments in money and banking, derivative securities, corporate finance, and fixed-income securities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书