Challenging traditional leadership models: a narrative review of advanced practice provider integration in health system governance.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Michael John Steger
{"title":"Challenging traditional leadership models: a narrative review of advanced practice provider integration in health system governance.","authors":"Michael John Steger","doi":"10.1108/JHOM-05-2025-0251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Advanced practice providers (APPs) are essential to health system capacity yet remain underrepresented in governance and executive leadership. This narrative review synthesizes existing peer-reviewed and organizational evidence into a five-domain framework for APP leadership integration and assesses its implications for organizational performance.</p><p><strong>Design/methodology/approach: </strong>A targeted narrative review was conducted, drawing from peer-reviewed literature, organizational case reports, and industry analyses published between 2013 and 2025. Sources were identified through PubMed, CINAHL, Google Scholar, discipline-specific journals and professional organizations. Inclusion criteria focused on governance, leadership, and organizational integration of Physician Assistants and Advanced Practice Registered Nurses. Given the applied focus on governance, selected grey literature was included to capture emerging practices. Evidence was synthesized thematically into five domains of APP leadership integration. This approach emphasizes conceptual clarity rather than exhaustive coverage.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Five interdependent domains of APP governance integration emerged: (1) governance inclusion and medical staff structures, (2) leadership development and career pathways, (3) operational alignment and role optimization, (4) culture, scope, and policy enablement and (5) measurement, accountability and the business case. Together these domains provide a framework for intentional inclusion of APPs in health system governance. Evidence indicates that APP leadership integration supports workforce retention, improves efficiency, and contributes to financial sustainability. Distinctions were noted between public and private health systems, with mission-driven organizations emphasizing equity and access, and private systems prioritizing return on investment and margin recovery.</p><p><strong>Research limitations/implications: </strong>As a targeted narrative review, this study does not claim exhaustiveness and may be subject to selection and publication bias. The existing literature is largely descriptive, with limited comparative studies or standardized outcome measures. Future research should evaluate governance models across diverse systems and establish benchmarks for measuring the impact of APP leadership.</p><p><strong>Practical implications: </strong>Health systems can strengthen organizational performance by embedding APPs into governance structures, developing leadership pipelines, aligning roles operationally, fostering inclusive cultures, and implementing measurement frameworks. These strategies reduce turnover, improve collaboration and enhance financial and clinical outcomes. While public sector systems may emphasize access and equity, private sector systems may prioritize return on investment and margin recovery, making APP governance integration a valuable strategy across contexts.</p><p><strong>Originality/value: </strong>While prior reviews have cataloged factors influencing APP workforce integration, this is the first narrative review to focus specifically on governance and leadership structures. By consolidating fragmented literature into a five-domain framework, the paper advances the discussion from whether APPs should be included in governance to how their inclusion can be intentionally structured and evaluated to improve system performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":47447,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Organization and Management","volume":" ","pages":"863-874"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Organization and Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-05-2025-0251","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Advanced practice providers (APPs) are essential to health system capacity yet remain underrepresented in governance and executive leadership. This narrative review synthesizes existing peer-reviewed and organizational evidence into a five-domain framework for APP leadership integration and assesses its implications for organizational performance.

Design/methodology/approach: A targeted narrative review was conducted, drawing from peer-reviewed literature, organizational case reports, and industry analyses published between 2013 and 2025. Sources were identified through PubMed, CINAHL, Google Scholar, discipline-specific journals and professional organizations. Inclusion criteria focused on governance, leadership, and organizational integration of Physician Assistants and Advanced Practice Registered Nurses. Given the applied focus on governance, selected grey literature was included to capture emerging practices. Evidence was synthesized thematically into five domains of APP leadership integration. This approach emphasizes conceptual clarity rather than exhaustive coverage.

Findings: Five interdependent domains of APP governance integration emerged: (1) governance inclusion and medical staff structures, (2) leadership development and career pathways, (3) operational alignment and role optimization, (4) culture, scope, and policy enablement and (5) measurement, accountability and the business case. Together these domains provide a framework for intentional inclusion of APPs in health system governance. Evidence indicates that APP leadership integration supports workforce retention, improves efficiency, and contributes to financial sustainability. Distinctions were noted between public and private health systems, with mission-driven organizations emphasizing equity and access, and private systems prioritizing return on investment and margin recovery.

Research limitations/implications: As a targeted narrative review, this study does not claim exhaustiveness and may be subject to selection and publication bias. The existing literature is largely descriptive, with limited comparative studies or standardized outcome measures. Future research should evaluate governance models across diverse systems and establish benchmarks for measuring the impact of APP leadership.

Practical implications: Health systems can strengthen organizational performance by embedding APPs into governance structures, developing leadership pipelines, aligning roles operationally, fostering inclusive cultures, and implementing measurement frameworks. These strategies reduce turnover, improve collaboration and enhance financial and clinical outcomes. While public sector systems may emphasize access and equity, private sector systems may prioritize return on investment and margin recovery, making APP governance integration a valuable strategy across contexts.

Originality/value: While prior reviews have cataloged factors influencing APP workforce integration, this is the first narrative review to focus specifically on governance and leadership structures. By consolidating fragmented literature into a five-domain framework, the paper advances the discussion from whether APPs should be included in governance to how their inclusion can be intentionally structured and evaluated to improve system performance.

挑战传统的领导模式:在卫生系统治理先进的实践提供者整合的叙述审查。
目的:高级实践提供者(app)对卫生系统能力至关重要,但在治理和行政领导中的代表性仍然不足。这篇叙述性综述将现有的同行评审和组织证据综合到APP领导力整合的五个领域框架中,并评估其对组织绩效的影响。设计/方法/方法:根据2013年至2025年间发表的同行评议文献、组织案例报告和行业分析,进行了有针对性的叙述性回顾。来源通过PubMed, CINAHL, b谷歌Scholar,特定学科期刊和专业组织确定。纳入标准侧重于医师助理和高级执业注册护士的管理、领导和组织整合。考虑到对治理的应用重点,选定的灰色文献被包括在内,以捕捉新兴的实践。证据按主题合成为APP领导整合的五个领域。这种方法强调概念的清晰性,而不是详尽的覆盖。研究发现:APP治理整合出现了五个相互依存的领域:(1)治理包容和医务人员结构;(2)领导力发展和职业路径;(3)运营一致性和角色优化;(4)文化、范围和政策实施;(5)衡量、问责制和商业案例。这些领域共同为有意将应用程序纳入卫生系统治理提供了一个框架。有证据表明,APP领导力整合支持劳动力保留,提高效率,并有助于财务可持续性。注意到公共和私营卫生系统之间的区别,使命驱动的组织强调公平和获取,而私营系统优先考虑投资回报和利润回收。研究局限性/启示:作为一项有针对性的叙述性综述,本研究不主张穷尽性,可能存在选择和发表偏倚。现有的文献大多是描述性的,比较研究或标准化的结果测量有限。未来的研究应该评估跨不同系统的治理模式,并建立衡量APP领导力影响的基准。实际影响:卫生系统可以通过将应用程序嵌入治理结构、发展领导管道、在操作上协调角色、培养包容性文化和实施衡量框架来加强组织绩效。这些战略减少了人员流动,改善了合作,提高了财务和临床结果。虽然公共部门系统可能强调准入和公平,但私营部门系统可能优先考虑投资回报和利润回收,使APP治理整合成为跨环境的有价值战略。原创性/价值:虽然之前的评论已经列出了影响APP劳动力整合的因素,但这是第一次专门关注治理和领导结构的叙述性评论。通过将支离破碎的文献整合到一个五域框架中,本文推进了从应用程序是否应该被纳入治理到如何有意地构建和评估它们的纳入以提高系统性能的讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: ■International health and international organizations ■Organisational behaviour, governance, management and leadership ■The inter-relationship of health and public sector services ■Theories and practices of management and leadership in health and related organizations ■Emotion in health care organizations ■Management education and training ■Industrial relations and human resource theory and management. As the demands on the health care industry both polarize and intensify, effective management of financial and human resources, the restructuring of organizations and the handling of market forces are increasingly important areas for the industry to address.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书