Investigating the Dynamics of Salmonella Contamination During Commercial Pork Harvest Using Qualitative and Quantitative Detection Methods

IF 3.7 4区 农林科学 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Journal of food protection Pub Date : 2025-12-10 Epub Date: 2025-11-06 DOI:10.1016/j.jfp.2025.100665
J.A. Brown, S.C. Ricke
{"title":"Investigating the Dynamics of Salmonella Contamination During Commercial Pork Harvest Using Qualitative and Quantitative Detection Methods","authors":"J.A. Brown,&nbsp;S.C. Ricke","doi":"10.1016/j.jfp.2025.100665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Animals can be reservoirs for pathogens such as <em>Salmonella</em>, creating the potential for cross−contamination during harvest. Antimicrobials are used to limit this risk, but validation of interventions in commercial settings can be challenging. The objective of this study was to develop a bio-map to evaluate the presence and concentration of <em>Salmonella</em> during harvest in commercial market hog facilities. Carcass swabs were collected from three commercial market hog facilities, five times a day for five days, at nine locations throughout harvest from exsanguination to chilling (<em>N</em> = 675). At each sampling interval, a single carcass was tracked through harvest by swabbing the ham, shoulder, and jowl. Samples were analyzed for quantitative and qualitative <em>Salmonella</em> using Gene-Up Quant (log<sub>10</sub> CFU/swab; limit of quantification (LOQ) = 1 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/swab) and Gene-Up SLM2 (present/absent; limit of detection (LOD) = 1 CFU/swab), respectively. Prevalence data were analyzed in R Studio using linear mixed effect models, with carcass as a repeated measure, and ANOVA with means separated by Tukey’s HSD (<em>p</em> ≤ 0.05). Due to the limited number of quantitative results above the LOQ (<em>n</em> = 7; 1.15–1.56 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/swab), statistical analyses were not performed. <em>Salmonella</em> prevalence was impacted by facility (<em>p</em> = 0.006), location (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), and the interaction between facility and location (<em>p</em> = 0.004). Across all facilities, <em>Salmonella</em> prevalence was highest on incoming pigs and decreased most significantly after external decontamination. These results indicate that while concentrations may be low, <em>Salmonella</em> contamination is prevalent throughout the pork harvest process, highlighting the need for effective detection systems to develop and evaluate process control strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of food protection","volume":"88 12","pages":"Article 100665"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of food protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X25002170","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Animals can be reservoirs for pathogens such as Salmonella, creating the potential for cross−contamination during harvest. Antimicrobials are used to limit this risk, but validation of interventions in commercial settings can be challenging. The objective of this study was to develop a bio-map to evaluate the presence and concentration of Salmonella during harvest in commercial market hog facilities. Carcass swabs were collected from three commercial market hog facilities, five times a day for five days, at nine locations throughout harvest from exsanguination to chilling (N = 675). At each sampling interval, a single carcass was tracked through harvest by swabbing the ham, shoulder, and jowl. Samples were analyzed for quantitative and qualitative Salmonella using Gene-Up Quant (log10 CFU/swab; limit of quantification (LOQ) = 1 log10 CFU/swab) and Gene-Up SLM2 (present/absent; limit of detection (LOD) = 1 CFU/swab), respectively. Prevalence data were analyzed in R Studio using linear mixed effect models, with carcass as a repeated measure, and ANOVA with means separated by Tukey’s HSD (p ≤ 0.05). Due to the limited number of quantitative results above the LOQ (n = 7; 1.15–1.56 log10 CFU/swab), statistical analyses were not performed. Salmonella prevalence was impacted by facility (p = 0.006), location (p < 0.001), and the interaction between facility and location (p = 0.004). Across all facilities, Salmonella prevalence was highest on incoming pigs and decreased most significantly after external decontamination. These results indicate that while concentrations may be low, Salmonella contamination is prevalent throughout the pork harvest process, highlighting the need for effective detection systems to develop and evaluate process control strategies.
利用定性和定量检测方法调查商业猪肉收获过程中沙门氏菌污染的动态。
动物可能是沙门氏菌等病原体的宿主,在收获期间造成交叉污染的可能性。使用抗微生物药物来限制这种风险;但是,在商业环境中验证干预措施可能具有挑战性。本研究的目的是建立一个生物图谱,以评估商业市场生猪设施收获期间沙门氏菌的存在和浓度。从放血到冷却的整个收获过程中,从三个商业市场生猪设施收集胴体拭子,每天5次,持续5天(N = 675)。在每个采样间隔,通过擦拭火腿、肩部和下巴来跟踪单个胴体的收获。分别采用Gene-Up定量(log10 CFU/拭子,定量限(LOQ) = 1 log10 CFU/拭子)和Gene-Up SLM2(存在/不存在,检出限(LOD) = 1 CFU/拭子)对样品进行定量和定性沙门氏菌分析。患病率数据在R Studio中采用线性混合效应模型进行分析,以胴体为重复测量,采用方差分析,均数以Tukey’s HSD分隔(p≤0.05)。由于高于定量限(n = 7; 1.15 - 1.56 log10 CFU/拭子)的定量结果数量有限,未进行统计分析。沙门氏菌感染率受设施(p = 0.006)、地点(p < 0.001)以及设施和地点之间的相互作用(p = 0.004)的影响。在所有设施中,入厂猪的沙门氏菌患病率最高,在外部净化后显著下降。这些结果表明,虽然浓度可能很低,但沙门氏菌污染在整个猪肉收获过程中普遍存在,强调需要有效的检测系统来制定和评估过程控制策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of food protection
Journal of food protection 工程技术-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
296
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Food Protection® (JFP) is an international, monthly scientific journal in the English language published by the International Association for Food Protection (IAFP). JFP publishes research and review articles on all aspects of food protection and safety. Major emphases of JFP are placed on studies dealing with: Tracking, detecting (including traditional, molecular, and real-time), inactivating, and controlling food-related hazards, including microorganisms (including antibiotic resistance), microbial (mycotoxins, seafood toxins) and non-microbial toxins (heavy metals, pesticides, veterinary drug residues, migrants from food packaging, and processing contaminants), allergens and pests (insects, rodents) in human food, pet food and animal feed throughout the food chain; Microbiological food quality and traditional/novel methods to assay microbiological food quality; Prevention of food-related hazards and food spoilage through food preservatives and thermal/non-thermal processes, including process validation; Food fermentations and food-related probiotics; Safe food handling practices during pre-harvest, harvest, post-harvest, distribution and consumption, including food safety education for retailers, foodservice, and consumers; Risk assessments for food-related hazards; Economic impact of food-related hazards, foodborne illness, food loss, food spoilage, and adulterated foods; Food fraud, food authentication, food defense, and foodborne disease outbreak investigations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书