{"title":"Investigating the Dynamics of Salmonella Contamination During Commercial Pork Harvest Using Qualitative and Quantitative Detection Methods","authors":"J.A. Brown, S.C. Ricke","doi":"10.1016/j.jfp.2025.100665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Animals can be reservoirs for pathogens such as <em>Salmonella</em>, creating the potential for cross−contamination during harvest. Antimicrobials are used to limit this risk, but validation of interventions in commercial settings can be challenging. The objective of this study was to develop a bio-map to evaluate the presence and concentration of <em>Salmonella</em> during harvest in commercial market hog facilities. Carcass swabs were collected from three commercial market hog facilities, five times a day for five days, at nine locations throughout harvest from exsanguination to chilling (<em>N</em> = 675). At each sampling interval, a single carcass was tracked through harvest by swabbing the ham, shoulder, and jowl. Samples were analyzed for quantitative and qualitative <em>Salmonella</em> using Gene-Up Quant (log<sub>10</sub> CFU/swab; limit of quantification (LOQ) = 1 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/swab) and Gene-Up SLM2 (present/absent; limit of detection (LOD) = 1 CFU/swab), respectively. Prevalence data were analyzed in R Studio using linear mixed effect models, with carcass as a repeated measure, and ANOVA with means separated by Tukey’s HSD (<em>p</em> ≤ 0.05). Due to the limited number of quantitative results above the LOQ (<em>n</em> = 7; 1.15–1.56 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/swab), statistical analyses were not performed. <em>Salmonella</em> prevalence was impacted by facility (<em>p</em> = 0.006), location (<em>p</em> < 0.001), and the interaction between facility and location (<em>p</em> = 0.004). Across all facilities, <em>Salmonella</em> prevalence was highest on incoming pigs and decreased most significantly after external decontamination. These results indicate that while concentrations may be low, <em>Salmonella</em> contamination is prevalent throughout the pork harvest process, highlighting the need for effective detection systems to develop and evaluate process control strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of food protection","volume":"88 12","pages":"Article 100665"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of food protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X25002170","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Animals can be reservoirs for pathogens such as Salmonella, creating the potential for cross−contamination during harvest. Antimicrobials are used to limit this risk, but validation of interventions in commercial settings can be challenging. The objective of this study was to develop a bio-map to evaluate the presence and concentration of Salmonella during harvest in commercial market hog facilities. Carcass swabs were collected from three commercial market hog facilities, five times a day for five days, at nine locations throughout harvest from exsanguination to chilling (N = 675). At each sampling interval, a single carcass was tracked through harvest by swabbing the ham, shoulder, and jowl. Samples were analyzed for quantitative and qualitative Salmonella using Gene-Up Quant (log10 CFU/swab; limit of quantification (LOQ) = 1 log10 CFU/swab) and Gene-Up SLM2 (present/absent; limit of detection (LOD) = 1 CFU/swab), respectively. Prevalence data were analyzed in R Studio using linear mixed effect models, with carcass as a repeated measure, and ANOVA with means separated by Tukey’s HSD (p ≤ 0.05). Due to the limited number of quantitative results above the LOQ (n = 7; 1.15–1.56 log10 CFU/swab), statistical analyses were not performed. Salmonella prevalence was impacted by facility (p = 0.006), location (p < 0.001), and the interaction between facility and location (p = 0.004). Across all facilities, Salmonella prevalence was highest on incoming pigs and decreased most significantly after external decontamination. These results indicate that while concentrations may be low, Salmonella contamination is prevalent throughout the pork harvest process, highlighting the need for effective detection systems to develop and evaluate process control strategies.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Food Protection® (JFP) is an international, monthly scientific journal in the English language published by the International Association for Food Protection (IAFP). JFP publishes research and review articles on all aspects of food protection and safety. Major emphases of JFP are placed on studies dealing with:
Tracking, detecting (including traditional, molecular, and real-time), inactivating, and controlling food-related hazards, including microorganisms (including antibiotic resistance), microbial (mycotoxins, seafood toxins) and non-microbial toxins (heavy metals, pesticides, veterinary drug residues, migrants from food packaging, and processing contaminants), allergens and pests (insects, rodents) in human food, pet food and animal feed throughout the food chain;
Microbiological food quality and traditional/novel methods to assay microbiological food quality;
Prevention of food-related hazards and food spoilage through food preservatives and thermal/non-thermal processes, including process validation;
Food fermentations and food-related probiotics;
Safe food handling practices during pre-harvest, harvest, post-harvest, distribution and consumption, including food safety education for retailers, foodservice, and consumers;
Risk assessments for food-related hazards;
Economic impact of food-related hazards, foodborne illness, food loss, food spoilage, and adulterated foods;
Food fraud, food authentication, food defense, and foodborne disease outbreak investigations.