Myocardial injury biomarkers and their assays: advances, insights, and future directions.

IF 2.5 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Samuel McGrath, Bashir Alaour, Michael Marber
{"title":"Myocardial injury biomarkers and their assays: advances, insights, and future directions.","authors":"Samuel McGrath, Bashir Alaour, Michael Marber","doi":"10.1080/14779072.2025.2586669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cardiac Troponin (cTn) is fundamental to the diagnosis of myocardial injury. High sensitivity cTn assays have transformed acute cardiac care by shifting the focus toward rapid rule-out of myocardial infarction, allowing the early identification and safe discharge of low-risk patients. However, cTn proteins and their assays have limitations.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>The review summarizes cTn as a biomarker of myocardial injury, high-sensitivity cTn assay performance, and their combined impact on chest pain pathways. It explores Cardiac Myosin-Binding Protein C (cMyC) and discusses the evidence behind its use as an alternative biomarker. Studies available on Pubmed were analyzed using keywords cTn, cMyC, myocardial infarction, triage, chest pain and assay. The second half of this review explores the proteolysis of both these biomarkers, and how this information could be used in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Both hs-cTn and hs-cMyC assays have shown equivalent diagnostic performance in the rule-out of myocardial infarction. Unfortunately, both are also plagued by the similar liabilities: decreased specificity for Type 1 AMI, and an inability to distinguish between types of myocardial injury. Proteolysis of each biomarker differs according to underlying pathology. Novel assays that quantify distinct forms could enhance patient triage.</p>","PeriodicalId":12098,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"855-866"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14779072.2025.2586669","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Cardiac Troponin (cTn) is fundamental to the diagnosis of myocardial injury. High sensitivity cTn assays have transformed acute cardiac care by shifting the focus toward rapid rule-out of myocardial infarction, allowing the early identification and safe discharge of low-risk patients. However, cTn proteins and their assays have limitations.

Areas covered: The review summarizes cTn as a biomarker of myocardial injury, high-sensitivity cTn assay performance, and their combined impact on chest pain pathways. It explores Cardiac Myosin-Binding Protein C (cMyC) and discusses the evidence behind its use as an alternative biomarker. Studies available on Pubmed were analyzed using keywords cTn, cMyC, myocardial infarction, triage, chest pain and assay. The second half of this review explores the proteolysis of both these biomarkers, and how this information could be used in clinical practice.

Expert opinion: Both hs-cTn and hs-cMyC assays have shown equivalent diagnostic performance in the rule-out of myocardial infarction. Unfortunately, both are also plagued by the similar liabilities: decreased specificity for Type 1 AMI, and an inability to distinguish between types of myocardial injury. Proteolysis of each biomarker differs according to underlying pathology. Novel assays that quantify distinct forms could enhance patient triage.

心肌损伤生物标志物及其测定:进展、见解和未来方向。
心肌肌钙蛋白(cTn)是诊断心肌损伤的基础。高灵敏度cTn检测通过将重点转移到快速排除心肌梗死,从而改变了急性心脏护理,允许早期识别和安全出院低风险患者。然而,cTn蛋白及其测定有局限性。涵盖领域:综述总结了cTn作为心肌损伤的生物标志物,高灵敏度的cTn检测性能,以及它们对胸痛通路的综合影响。它探讨了心肌肌球蛋白结合蛋白C (cMyC),并讨论了其作为替代生物标志物背后的证据。通过关键词cTn、cMyC、心肌梗死、分诊、胸痛和分析,对Pubmed上的研究进行了分析。本综述的后半部分探讨了这两种生物标志物的蛋白水解,以及如何将这些信息用于临床实践。专家意见:hs-cTn和hs-cMyC检测在排除心肌梗死方面显示出相同的诊断性能。不幸的是,两者都有相似的缺点:1型AMI特异性降低,无法区分不同类型的心肌损伤。每种生物标志物的蛋白水解根据潜在病理而不同。量化不同形式的新型检测方法可以加强患者的分诊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy
Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy (ISSN 1477-9072) provides expert reviews on the clinical applications of new medicines, therapeutic agents and diagnostics in cardiovascular disease. Coverage includes drug therapy, heart disease, vascular disorders, hypertension, cholesterol in cardiovascular disease, heart disease, stroke, heart failure and cardiovascular surgery. The Expert Review format is unique. Each review provides a complete overview of current thinking in a key area of research or clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书