Diabetes and ischemia in stress perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance are comparable risk factors for cardiovascular events

Radiologia Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-12 DOI:10.1016/j.rxeng.2025.101650
M. Jiménez Martín , P.M. Azcárate , J. Urmeneta Ulloa , A. Ezponda , G. Bastarrika
{"title":"Diabetes and ischemia in stress perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance are comparable risk factors for cardiovascular events","authors":"M. Jiménez Martín ,&nbsp;P.M. Azcárate ,&nbsp;J. Urmeneta Ulloa ,&nbsp;A. Ezponda ,&nbsp;G. Bastarrika","doi":"10.1016/j.rxeng.2025.101650","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Various studies have explored the concept of diabetes mellitus (DM) as a coronary risk equivalent. However, current evidence does not wholly support this conclusion. This study aimed to ascertain whether DM can be validated as a coronary risk equivalent through stress perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance (stress CMR) imaging.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>Three hundred thirty-three patients with and without DM who were referred for stress CMR between 2009 and 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. Images were visually interpreted and classified based on the presence of myocardial ischemia. Survival data and occurrence of major cardiovascular events were recorded and compared.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 333 patients, 139 had DM (133 DM type I y 6 type II), (101 without ischemia, 38 with ischemia) and 194 had no DM (165 without ischemia and 29 with ischemia). A total of 70 events occurred during a median follow-up of 27 months. Diabetic patients without myocardial ischemia had a lower incidence of major cardiovascular events (death any cause, acute coronary syndrome, or need for revascularization) compared with non-diabetic patients with ischemia (16.8% vs. 41.1% respectively, p &lt; 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Diabetic patients with high cardiovascular risk without ischemia exhibit a more favourable prognosis compared to non-diabetic subjects with high prevalence of obstructive coronary artery disease and ischemia. According to our results, DM may not be considered as equivalent to coronary risk. Patients should be treated individually, given the heterogeneity found in DM population.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94185,"journal":{"name":"Radiologia","volume":"67 6","pages":"Article 101650"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S217351072500134X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Various studies have explored the concept of diabetes mellitus (DM) as a coronary risk equivalent. However, current evidence does not wholly support this conclusion. This study aimed to ascertain whether DM can be validated as a coronary risk equivalent through stress perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance (stress CMR) imaging.

Material and methods

Three hundred thirty-three patients with and without DM who were referred for stress CMR between 2009 and 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. Images were visually interpreted and classified based on the presence of myocardial ischemia. Survival data and occurrence of major cardiovascular events were recorded and compared.

Results

Of the 333 patients, 139 had DM (133 DM type I y 6 type II), (101 without ischemia, 38 with ischemia) and 194 had no DM (165 without ischemia and 29 with ischemia). A total of 70 events occurred during a median follow-up of 27 months. Diabetic patients without myocardial ischemia had a lower incidence of major cardiovascular events (death any cause, acute coronary syndrome, or need for revascularization) compared with non-diabetic patients with ischemia (16.8% vs. 41.1% respectively, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Diabetic patients with high cardiovascular risk without ischemia exhibit a more favourable prognosis compared to non-diabetic subjects with high prevalence of obstructive coronary artery disease and ischemia. According to our results, DM may not be considered as equivalent to coronary risk. Patients should be treated individually, given the heterogeneity found in DM population.
糖尿病和心脏磁共振应激灌注缺血是心血管事件的可比危险因素
各种研究已经探讨了糖尿病(DM)作为冠状动脉危险等同物的概念。然而,目前的证据并不完全支持这一结论。本研究旨在通过压力灌注心脏磁共振(stress CMR)成像确定糖尿病是否可以作为冠状动脉风险当量。材料和方法回顾性分析2009年至2013年间333例有或无糖尿病的患者进行应激性CMR。根据心肌缺血的存在对图像进行视觉解释和分类。记录生存数据和主要心血管事件的发生并进行比较。结果333例患者中,糖尿病139例(1型糖尿病133例,2型糖尿病6例),无缺血101例,有缺血38例,无糖尿病194例(无缺血165例,有缺血29例)。在27个月的中位随访期间共发生了70例事件。无心肌缺血的糖尿病患者的主要心血管事件(任何原因死亡、急性冠状动脉综合征或需要血运重建术)发生率低于无缺血的糖尿病患者(分别为16.8%和41.1%,p <; 0.001)。结论无缺血的糖尿病高危心血管患者的预后优于有阻塞性冠状动脉疾病和缺血的非糖尿病患者。根据我们的研究结果,糖尿病可能不等同于冠状动脉风险。鉴于糖尿病人群的异质性,患者应单独治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书