A new model for relative gas permeability considering the dynamics of pore-scale water distribution

IF 5.5 0 ENERGY & FUELS
Gas Science and Engineering Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-31 DOI:10.1016/j.jgsce.2025.205800
Lin-Yong Cui , Min Chen , Shakil A. Masum , Yuan-Hao Wei
{"title":"A new model for relative gas permeability considering the dynamics of pore-scale water distribution","authors":"Lin-Yong Cui ,&nbsp;Min Chen ,&nbsp;Shakil A. Masum ,&nbsp;Yuan-Hao Wei","doi":"10.1016/j.jgsce.2025.205800","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Investigating gas flow through unsaturated soils is crucial for various geoscientific and engineering applications. Traditional statistical permeability models, based on capillary-law theory, often overestimate gas permeability. While recent efforts have extended gas permeability functions into the adsorption region, they rarely consider the dynamics of water distribution at the pore scale. This study introduces a new approach to predicting gas permeability by considering the dynamics of flow regimes as water saturation increases. This approach employs a dual-regime framework that sequentially accounts for the funicular and separate channel flow regimes. At low saturation, water forms thin films on particle surfaces, and as saturation increases, these films thicken, creating a funicular flow regime. At higher saturation levels, capillary forces gradually dominate gas flow, and gas occupies larger pores while water fills smaller ones, enabling separate channel flow regime. To mathematically represent and integrate these two physical processes, a piecewise function is used, and a model parameter of critical saturation is defined to delineate the transition between these two regimes. For verification, a dataset comprising 31 different soils, including loam, sand, loess, and clay, was compiled from various literature sources. The prediction results by the proposed model show good agreement with experimental data, yielding low RMSE and MAE values of 0.050 and 0.028, respectively. To provide a rapid method for predicting relative gas permeability based on readily available parameters, this study established an empirical relationship between critical saturation and residual saturation, which also yields satisfactory results with RMSE and MAE values of 0.085 and 0.054, respectively. The findings of this study offer a new perspective on understanding gas transport within unsaturated soils.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100568,"journal":{"name":"Gas Science and Engineering","volume":"145 ","pages":"Article 205800"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gas Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S294990892500264X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Investigating gas flow through unsaturated soils is crucial for various geoscientific and engineering applications. Traditional statistical permeability models, based on capillary-law theory, often overestimate gas permeability. While recent efforts have extended gas permeability functions into the adsorption region, they rarely consider the dynamics of water distribution at the pore scale. This study introduces a new approach to predicting gas permeability by considering the dynamics of flow regimes as water saturation increases. This approach employs a dual-regime framework that sequentially accounts for the funicular and separate channel flow regimes. At low saturation, water forms thin films on particle surfaces, and as saturation increases, these films thicken, creating a funicular flow regime. At higher saturation levels, capillary forces gradually dominate gas flow, and gas occupies larger pores while water fills smaller ones, enabling separate channel flow regime. To mathematically represent and integrate these two physical processes, a piecewise function is used, and a model parameter of critical saturation is defined to delineate the transition between these two regimes. For verification, a dataset comprising 31 different soils, including loam, sand, loess, and clay, was compiled from various literature sources. The prediction results by the proposed model show good agreement with experimental data, yielding low RMSE and MAE values of 0.050 and 0.028, respectively. To provide a rapid method for predicting relative gas permeability based on readily available parameters, this study established an empirical relationship between critical saturation and residual saturation, which also yields satisfactory results with RMSE and MAE values of 0.085 and 0.054, respectively. The findings of this study offer a new perspective on understanding gas transport within unsaturated soils.
考虑孔隙尺度水分布动力学的相对渗透率新模型
研究非饱和土中的气体流动对于各种地球科学和工程应用至关重要。传统的渗透率统计模型基于毛细管定律理论,往往高估了气体的渗透率。虽然最近的研究已经将气体渗透功能扩展到吸附区域,但他们很少考虑孔隙尺度上水分布的动力学。该研究引入了一种新的方法,通过考虑随含水饱和度增加的流动动态来预测渗透率。这种方法采用了一种双重制度框架,依次考虑了索道和单独的渠道流动制度。在低饱和度下,水在颗粒表面形成薄膜,随着饱和度的增加,这些薄膜变厚,形成索状流动。在较高的饱和水平下,毛细力逐渐主导气体流动,气体占据较大的孔隙,而水填充较小的孔隙,形成单独的通道流动状态。为了在数学上表示和整合这两种物理过程,使用了分段函数,并定义了临界饱和度的模型参数来描述这两种状态之间的过渡。为了验证,从各种文献来源汇编了一个包含31种不同土壤的数据集,包括壤土、沙土、黄土和粘土。模型预测结果与实验数据吻合较好,RMSE和MAE值均较低,分别为0.050和0.028。为了提供一种基于现有参数的快速预测相对渗透率的方法,本研究建立了临界饱和度和剩余饱和度之间的经验关系,RMSE和MAE分别为0.085和0.054,也获得了令人满意的结果。本研究结果为认识非饱和土壤中的气体运移提供了新的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书