A comprehensive value evaluation index system for provincial medical insurance access to traditional Chinese medicine preparations in medical institutions

IF 4.9 4区 医学 Q2 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Integrative Medicine Research Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-28 DOI:10.1016/j.imr.2025.101258
Xinyan Jin , Changgeng Su , Jiale Zhang , Yujuan Liu , Xiaoying Chen , Rui Zhao
{"title":"A comprehensive value evaluation index system for provincial medical insurance access to traditional Chinese medicine preparations in medical institutions","authors":"Xinyan Jin ,&nbsp;Changgeng Su ,&nbsp;Jiale Zhang ,&nbsp;Yujuan Liu ,&nbsp;Xiaoying Chen ,&nbsp;Rui Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.imr.2025.101258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>This study established a comprehensive value evaluation index system for provincial medical insurance access to traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) preparations in medical institutions from the insurance viewpoint. The system aims to provide a reference for insurance access applications and decision-making.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The index system was first established through systematic evaluation and expert consultation. The Delphi method and analytic hierarchy process were employed to reveal the index system and calculate each indicator’s weight. The indicator selection thresholds were based on the importance score thresholds and the coefficient of variation thresholds. Indicators with importance scores higher than the threshold and coefficient of variation less than the threshold were included in the index system.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The researchers retrieved 6201 articles in total, 68 of which were retained following a review of the titles and full text. The initially established index system had six dimensions (i.e., basic information and TCM theory of the preparation, safety, effectiveness, economy, innovation, and fairness), 25 primary indicators, and 55 secondary indicators. Two expert consultation rounds were employed to collect the opinions of 13 and 11 experts. The final index system considered the index system’s aforementioned six dimensions, including safety (30.44 %), effectiveness (43.18 %), economy (14.72 %), innovation (6.48 %), and fairness (5.17 %), along with 22 primary indicators, and 26 secondary indicators. Moreover, the top three weight indicators were the prescription source (secondary indicator), effectiveness evaluation based on real-world evidence (primary indicator), and direct costs (secondary indicator).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The proposed index system elucidates the scope of evidence and basic research design for TCM preparations from the insurance viewpoint. It also integrates cost evaluation and value evaluation indicators and improves the definition of reference drugs, thus providing a reference for achieving rational clinical drug usage and a pricing policy for TCM preparations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13644,"journal":{"name":"Integrative Medicine Research","volume":"15 2","pages":"Article 101258"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrative Medicine Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213422025001386","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

This study established a comprehensive value evaluation index system for provincial medical insurance access to traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) preparations in medical institutions from the insurance viewpoint. The system aims to provide a reference for insurance access applications and decision-making.

Methods

The index system was first established through systematic evaluation and expert consultation. The Delphi method and analytic hierarchy process were employed to reveal the index system and calculate each indicator’s weight. The indicator selection thresholds were based on the importance score thresholds and the coefficient of variation thresholds. Indicators with importance scores higher than the threshold and coefficient of variation less than the threshold were included in the index system.

Results

The researchers retrieved 6201 articles in total, 68 of which were retained following a review of the titles and full text. The initially established index system had six dimensions (i.e., basic information and TCM theory of the preparation, safety, effectiveness, economy, innovation, and fairness), 25 primary indicators, and 55 secondary indicators. Two expert consultation rounds were employed to collect the opinions of 13 and 11 experts. The final index system considered the index system’s aforementioned six dimensions, including safety (30.44 %), effectiveness (43.18 %), economy (14.72 %), innovation (6.48 %), and fairness (5.17 %), along with 22 primary indicators, and 26 secondary indicators. Moreover, the top three weight indicators were the prescription source (secondary indicator), effectiveness evaluation based on real-world evidence (primary indicator), and direct costs (secondary indicator).

Conclusion

The proposed index system elucidates the scope of evidence and basic research design for TCM preparations from the insurance viewpoint. It also integrates cost evaluation and value evaluation indicators and improves the definition of reference drugs, thus providing a reference for achieving rational clinical drug usage and a pricing policy for TCM preparations.
省级医保医疗机构中药制剂可及性综合价值评价指标体系
本研究从保险视角构建省级医保医疗机构中药制剂可及性的综合价值评价指标体系。该系统旨在为保险接入申请和决策提供参考。方法通过系统评价和专家咨询,初步建立指标体系。采用德尔菲法和层次分析法揭示指标体系,计算各指标的权重。指标选择阈值基于重要性评分阈值和变异系数阈值。将重要性得分高于阈值且变异系数小于阈值的指标纳入指标体系。结果研究人员共检索到6201篇文章,其中68篇在检索标题和全文后被保留。初步建立的指标体系包括制剂基础信息与中医理论、安全性、有效性、经济性、创新性、公平性6个维度,25个一级指标,55个二级指标。采用两轮专家咨询,分别收集了13位和11位专家的意见。最终的指标体系考虑了上述指标体系的6个维度,即安全性(30.44%)、有效性(43.18%)、经济性(14.72%)、创新性(6.48%)、公平性(5.17%)等22个一级指标和26个二级指标。权重前3位的指标分别是处方来源(次要指标)、基于真实证据的有效性评价(首要指标)和直接成本(次要指标)。结论提出的指标体系从保险角度阐明了中药制剂的证据范围和基础研究设计。整合成本评价和价值评价指标,完善参比药定义,为实现临床合理用药和中药制剂定价政策提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Integrative Medicine Research
Integrative Medicine Research Medicine-Complementary and Alternative Medicine
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
65
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Integrative Medicine Research (IMR) is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal focused on scientific research for integrative medicine including traditional medicine (emphasis on acupuncture and herbal medicine), complementary and alternative medicine, and systems medicine. The journal includes papers on basic research, clinical research, methodology, theory, computational analysis and modelling, topical reviews, medical history, education and policy based on physiology, pathology, diagnosis and the systems approach in the field of integrative medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书