Male? Female? Neutral! Using novel polyhedral figures as gender-neutral stimuli in a mental-rotation test

IF 4.4 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, BIOLOGICAL
Learning and Motivation Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-05 DOI:10.1016/j.lmot.2025.102210
Vera Ruthsatz, Mirko Saunders, Michelle Lennon-Maslin, Claudia M. Quaiser-Pohl
{"title":"Male? Female? Neutral! Using novel polyhedral figures as gender-neutral stimuli in a mental-rotation test","authors":"Vera Ruthsatz,&nbsp;Mirko Saunders,&nbsp;Michelle Lennon-Maslin,&nbsp;Claudia M. Quaiser-Pohl","doi":"10.1016/j.lmot.2025.102210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates sex differences in mental-rotation performance using novel, gender-neutral polyhedral stimuli. In contrast to the widely used cube figures, which are often perceived as male-stereotyped, these stimuli were specifically designed to be structurally analogous but less familiar and therefore less gender stereotypical. We hypothesised that such neutral stimuli might reduce sex differences, and that controlling for childhood play behaviour might improve explanatory precision by accounting for experiential differences between male and female participants. A total of 122 participants (83 females and 39 males; <em>M</em> = 25.95 years, <em>SD</em> = 9.26) completed the mental-rotation test and a self-assessment scale. In addition, they assessed the stereotypical nature of the polyhedra and answered a questionnaire assessing childhood gender-role behaviour. Participants confirmed that the novel polyhedral figures did not evoke gender associations, supporting their suitability for bias-reduced mental-rotation testing. Despite contrary expectations, mental-rotation accuracy differed significantly between sexes, whereas reaction times did not. To better understand the observed difference, regression analyses were conducted. These revealed that the effect of sex on accuracy was mediated by childhood play behaviour. While this effect was present across the full sample, correlation analyses suggested it was primarily driven by female participants. Moreover, feminine gender-role behaviour was associated with faster reaction times and worse accuracy, possibly reflecting differences in task engagement and motivational factors. Overall, the results support the interpretation that sex differences in mental-rotation accuracy reflect experiential rather than inherent cognitive factors. This study contributes to mental-rotation research by introducing an alternative stimulus set and by highlighting the need to consider developmental and motivational influences, which might vary with the choice of stimulus material, when interpreting differences in mental-rotation performance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47305,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Motivation","volume":"92 ","pages":"Article 102210"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Motivation","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0023969025001171","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, BIOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates sex differences in mental-rotation performance using novel, gender-neutral polyhedral stimuli. In contrast to the widely used cube figures, which are often perceived as male-stereotyped, these stimuli were specifically designed to be structurally analogous but less familiar and therefore less gender stereotypical. We hypothesised that such neutral stimuli might reduce sex differences, and that controlling for childhood play behaviour might improve explanatory precision by accounting for experiential differences between male and female participants. A total of 122 participants (83 females and 39 males; M = 25.95 years, SD = 9.26) completed the mental-rotation test and a self-assessment scale. In addition, they assessed the stereotypical nature of the polyhedra and answered a questionnaire assessing childhood gender-role behaviour. Participants confirmed that the novel polyhedral figures did not evoke gender associations, supporting their suitability for bias-reduced mental-rotation testing. Despite contrary expectations, mental-rotation accuracy differed significantly between sexes, whereas reaction times did not. To better understand the observed difference, regression analyses were conducted. These revealed that the effect of sex on accuracy was mediated by childhood play behaviour. While this effect was present across the full sample, correlation analyses suggested it was primarily driven by female participants. Moreover, feminine gender-role behaviour was associated with faster reaction times and worse accuracy, possibly reflecting differences in task engagement and motivational factors. Overall, the results support the interpretation that sex differences in mental-rotation accuracy reflect experiential rather than inherent cognitive factors. This study contributes to mental-rotation research by introducing an alternative stimulus set and by highlighting the need to consider developmental and motivational influences, which might vary with the choice of stimulus material, when interpreting differences in mental-rotation performance.
男性吗?母的呢?中性!在心理旋转测试中使用新多面体作为性别中立刺激
本研究使用新颖的、性别中立的多面体刺激来研究心理旋转表现的性别差异。与广泛使用的立方体图形(通常被认为是男性刻板印象)相反,这些刺激是专门设计的,在结构上类似,但不太熟悉,因此不那么具有性别刻板印象。我们假设这种中性刺激可能会减少性别差异,并且通过考虑男女参与者之间的经验差异,控制童年游戏行为可能会提高解释的准确性。共122名受试者(女性83名,男性39名,M = 25.95岁,SD = 9.26)完成了心理旋转测试和自评量表。此外,他们还评估了多面体的定型性质,并回答了一份评估儿童性别角色行为的问卷。参与者证实,新的多面体图形不会引起性别联系,支持他们适合于减少偏见的心理旋转测试。尽管有相反的预期,但心理旋转的准确性在性别之间存在显著差异,而反应时间则没有。为了更好地理解观察到的差异,我们进行了回归分析。这些结果表明,性别对准确性的影响是由童年玩耍行为介导的。虽然这种影响在整个样本中都存在,但相关分析表明,它主要是由女性参与者驱动的。此外,女性的性别角色行为与更快的反应时间和更差的准确性有关,这可能反映了任务投入和动机因素的差异。总的来说,结果支持这样的解释,即心理旋转准确性的性别差异反映的是经验因素,而不是固有的认知因素。本研究通过引入替代刺激集,并强调在解释心理旋转表现的差异时,需要考虑可能随刺激材料的选择而变化的发展和动机影响,从而有助于心理旋转研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: Learning and Motivation features original experimental research devoted to the analysis of basic phenomena and mechanisms of learning, memory, and motivation. These studies, involving either animal or human subjects, examine behavioral, biological, and evolutionary influences on the learning and motivation processes, and often report on an integrated series of experiments that advance knowledge in this field. Theoretical papers and shorter reports are also considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书