Feasibility, acceptability and preliminary effectiveness of a gamified physical education intervention on motor competence and emotional intelligence

IF 3.3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Jenna Rice, Lawrence Foweather, Ceriann Magill, Jonathan Foulkes, An De Meester, Matthieu Lenoir, David Stodden, Katie Fitton Davies
{"title":"Feasibility, acceptability and preliminary effectiveness of a gamified physical education intervention on motor competence and emotional intelligence","authors":"Jenna Rice, Lawrence Foweather, Ceriann Magill, Jonathan Foulkes, An De Meester, Matthieu Lenoir, David Stodden, Katie Fitton Davies","doi":"10.1177/1356336x251388628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study evaluated (a) the feasibility and acceptability of a gamified physical education (PE) intervention among 9- to 10-year-old children and (b) intervention effectiveness on emotional intelligence (EI), motor competence (MC), basic psychological needs (BPNs) and motivational regulations. A mixed-method, single-group, pre-post trial was conducted in three primary schools in North West England. Classroom teachers taught a 10-week gamified PE unit (one 60-minute lesson per week). Researcher logs recorded recruitment, retention, adherence and attrition; feasibility and acceptability were assessed via semi-structured teacher interviews ( <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">n</jats:italic> = 3) and three focus groups with children ( <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">n</jats:italic> = 18). Children completed questionnaires assessing EI, BPNs and motivational regulations. MC was measured with the Körperkoordinationtest für Kinder and the Motor Competence Assessment. Three teachers and 63 children were recruited. Adherence was good (26/30 lessons taught), and participant retention was excellent (0% attrition). Qualitative findings indicated the intervention was feasible and acceptable: lessons were easy to follow, well-structured, inclusive, fun, and promoted teamwork. Challenges were mainly logistical (set-up time and equipment). Improvements were observed from pre- to post-test in EI ( <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">F</jats:italic> = 38.02, <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">p</jats:italic> &lt; .001), MC ( <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">p</jats:italic> <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">&lt;</jats:italic> .05), intrinsic motivation in PE ( <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">F</jats:italic> = 10.08, <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">p</jats:italic> = .002), and identified ( <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">F</jats:italic> = 11.84, <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">p</jats:italic> &lt; .001) and external regulation ( <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">F</jats:italic> = 4.15, <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">p</jats:italic> = .046) for physical activity. However, EI outcome measurement posed challenges (child comprehension/scale structure), highlighting the need for child-appropriate tools. Overall, findings support trial feasibility and intervention acceptability, with promising effects, warranting a larger controlled trial.","PeriodicalId":47681,"journal":{"name":"European Physical Education Review","volume":"137 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Physical Education Review","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336x251388628","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluated (a) the feasibility and acceptability of a gamified physical education (PE) intervention among 9- to 10-year-old children and (b) intervention effectiveness on emotional intelligence (EI), motor competence (MC), basic psychological needs (BPNs) and motivational regulations. A mixed-method, single-group, pre-post trial was conducted in three primary schools in North West England. Classroom teachers taught a 10-week gamified PE unit (one 60-minute lesson per week). Researcher logs recorded recruitment, retention, adherence and attrition; feasibility and acceptability were assessed via semi-structured teacher interviews ( n = 3) and three focus groups with children ( n = 18). Children completed questionnaires assessing EI, BPNs and motivational regulations. MC was measured with the Körperkoordinationtest für Kinder and the Motor Competence Assessment. Three teachers and 63 children were recruited. Adherence was good (26/30 lessons taught), and participant retention was excellent (0% attrition). Qualitative findings indicated the intervention was feasible and acceptable: lessons were easy to follow, well-structured, inclusive, fun, and promoted teamwork. Challenges were mainly logistical (set-up time and equipment). Improvements were observed from pre- to post-test in EI ( F = 38.02, p < .001), MC ( p < .05), intrinsic motivation in PE ( F = 10.08, p = .002), and identified ( F = 11.84, p < .001) and external regulation ( F = 4.15, p = .046) for physical activity. However, EI outcome measurement posed challenges (child comprehension/scale structure), highlighting the need for child-appropriate tools. Overall, findings support trial feasibility and intervention acceptability, with promising effects, warranting a larger controlled trial.
游戏化体育干预运动能力和情绪智力的可行性、可接受性和初步效果
本研究评估了游戏化体育教育(PE)干预在9- 10岁儿童中的可行性和可接受性,以及干预在情绪智力(EI)、运动能力(MC)、基本心理需求(BPNs)和动机调节方面的效果。在英格兰西北部的三所小学进行了一项混合方法、单组、前后试验。课堂教师讲授为期10周的游戏化体育单元(每周一节60分钟的课)。研究人员日志记录了招募、保留、坚持和减员;通过半结构化教师访谈(n = 3)和三个儿童焦点小组(n = 18)评估可行性和可接受性。孩子们完成了评估EI、BPNs和动机规则的问卷。MC采用Körperkoordinationtest f r Kinder量表和运动能力量表进行测量。招募了3名教师和63名儿童。依从性很好(26/30节课),参与者保留率很好(0%的流失率)。定性研究结果表明,干预是可行和可接受的:课程易于遵循,结构良好,包容性强,有趣,并促进了团队合作。挑战主要是后勤方面的(设置时间和设备)。从测试前到测试后,观察到EI (F = 38.02, p < 0.001), MC (p < 0.05),体育运动的内在动机(F = 10.08, p = .002)和身体活动的识别(F = 11.84, p < 0.001)和外部调节(F = 4.15, p = .046)的改善。然而,情商结果测量提出了挑战(儿童理解/量表结构),强调需要适合儿童的工具。总的来说,研究结果支持试验的可行性和干预的可接受性,具有良好的效果,需要进行更大规模的对照试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Physical Education Review
European Physical Education Review EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: - Multidisciplinary Approaches: European Physical Education Review brings together contributions from a wide range of disciplines across the natural and social sciences and humanities. It includes theoretical and research-based articles and occasionally devotes Special Issues to major topics and themes within the field. - International Coverage: European Physical Education Review publishes contributions from Europe and all regions of the world, promoting international communication among scholars and professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书