Virtual reality simulation to foster authentic learning in pre-service teacher education: A systematic literature review

IF 10.3 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Educational Research Review Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-08 DOI:10.1016/j.edurev.2025.100743
Sumin Hong , Taeyeon Eom , Jewoong Moon
{"title":"Virtual reality simulation to foster authentic learning in pre-service teacher education: A systematic literature review","authors":"Sumin Hong ,&nbsp;Taeyeon Eom ,&nbsp;Jewoong Moon","doi":"10.1016/j.edurev.2025.100743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Pre-service teacher education faces an ongoing challenge in bridging theory and practice. This systematic review synthesizes findings from 52 empirical studies (2016–2025) to address a critical gap: how the pedagogical design of virtual reality (VR) simulations aligns with authentic learning principles. Using Herrington and Oliver's authentic learning framework, we analyze the characteristics of these simulations and the extent to which they embody authenticity. Findings reveal a landscape of short, infrequent interventions that prioritize affective outcomes like self-efficacy over skill-based competencies. While VR simulations show promise, key authentic learning elements—such as in-situ collaboration, adaptive scaffolding, and authentic assessment—are consistently underdeveloped or externalized from the immersive environment. This review highlights a significant pedagogical-technological misalignment and proposes a research agenda focused on integrating robust assessment, longitudinal tracking of skill transfer, and the inclusion of psychomotor learning domains.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48125,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research Review","volume":"49 ","pages":"Article 100743"},"PeriodicalIF":10.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Research Review","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1747938X25000806","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pre-service teacher education faces an ongoing challenge in bridging theory and practice. This systematic review synthesizes findings from 52 empirical studies (2016–2025) to address a critical gap: how the pedagogical design of virtual reality (VR) simulations aligns with authentic learning principles. Using Herrington and Oliver's authentic learning framework, we analyze the characteristics of these simulations and the extent to which they embody authenticity. Findings reveal a landscape of short, infrequent interventions that prioritize affective outcomes like self-efficacy over skill-based competencies. While VR simulations show promise, key authentic learning elements—such as in-situ collaboration, adaptive scaffolding, and authentic assessment—are consistently underdeveloped or externalized from the immersive environment. This review highlights a significant pedagogical-technological misalignment and proposes a research agenda focused on integrating robust assessment, longitudinal tracking of skill transfer, and the inclusion of psychomotor learning domains.
虚拟现实模拟在职前教师教育中促进真实学习:系统的文献综述
职前教师教育在衔接理论与实践方面面临着持续的挑战。这篇系统综述综合了52项实证研究(2016-2025)的发现,以解决一个关键的差距:虚拟现实(VR)模拟的教学设计如何与真实的学习原则保持一致。利用Herrington和Oliver的真实学习框架,我们分析了这些模拟的特征及其体现真实性的程度。研究结果显示,短期、不频繁的干预措施优先考虑情感结果,如自我效能感,而不是基于技能的能力。虽然VR模拟显示出前景,但关键的真实学习元素——如现场协作、自适应脚手架和真实评估——一直不发达,或者从沉浸式环境中外化。这篇综述强调了一个重要的教学-技术偏差,并提出了一个研究议程,重点是整合强有力的评估,技能转移的纵向跟踪,以及包括精神运动学习领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Educational Research Review
Educational Research Review EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
19.40
自引率
0.90%
发文量
53
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Educational Research Review is an international journal catering to researchers and diverse agencies keen on reviewing studies and theoretical papers in education at any level. The journal welcomes high-quality articles that address educational research problems through a review approach, encompassing thematic or methodological reviews and meta-analyses. With an inclusive scope, the journal does not limit itself to any specific age range and invites articles across various settings where learning and education take place, such as schools, corporate training, and both formal and informal educational environments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书