Maria Fernanda Serna Orozco, Hilary Reinosa Rivera, Jennifer Jaramillo-Losada, Harold Andres Payan-Salcedo, Mildrey Mosquera Escudero
{"title":"Association of the Timed Up and Go Test With Alzheimer's Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Maria Fernanda Serna Orozco, Hilary Reinosa Rivera, Jennifer Jaramillo-Losada, Harold Andres Payan-Salcedo, Mildrey Mosquera Escudero","doi":"10.1177/07334648251394486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PurposeTo evaluate and estimate the association between Time and Go (TUG) test performance and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or Alzheimer's disease (AD) in older adults.MethodsA systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to synthesize data from studies examining the relationship between TUG test score and AD or MCI in adult subjects. The search strategy was applied to MEDLINE (OVID), Web of Science, Scopus, LILACS, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). Studies were selected based on predefined inclusion criteria. For meta-analysis, effect sizes were pooled using a random-effects model to account for heterogeneity across studies. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I<sup>2</sup> statistic, and publication bias was evaluated through funnel plot analysis. Sensitivity analyses were performed to test the robustness of the findings.ResultsA total of 25 studies were included in this review, of which 15 were incorporated into the meta-analysis. Participants with AD (4.22 [95% CI 2.76-5.69 s], <i>p</i> < 0.00001) and those with MCI (1.83 [95% CI 1.03-2.57 s], <i>p</i> < 0.00001) exhibited significantly longer times in the simple TUG test compared to healthy controls. The Dual-Task TUG test showed a stronger association with AD in the studies included in the analysis. AD participants demonstrated significantly longer test times (12.28 [95% CI 6.56-18.0 s], <i>p</i> < 0.0001) compared to cognitively normal controls.ConclusionsThis review highlights a potential association between TUG completion time and cognitive impairment in individuals with AD and MCI. The TUG test shows promise as a tool for the early identification and screening of cognitive decline and AD.</p>","PeriodicalId":47970,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Gerontology","volume":" ","pages":"2117-2129"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13672897/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Gerontology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07334648251394486","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
PurposeTo evaluate and estimate the association between Time and Go (TUG) test performance and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or Alzheimer's disease (AD) in older adults.MethodsA systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to synthesize data from studies examining the relationship between TUG test score and AD or MCI in adult subjects. The search strategy was applied to MEDLINE (OVID), Web of Science, Scopus, LILACS, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). Studies were selected based on predefined inclusion criteria. For meta-analysis, effect sizes were pooled using a random-effects model to account for heterogeneity across studies. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic, and publication bias was evaluated through funnel plot analysis. Sensitivity analyses were performed to test the robustness of the findings.ResultsA total of 25 studies were included in this review, of which 15 were incorporated into the meta-analysis. Participants with AD (4.22 [95% CI 2.76-5.69 s], p < 0.00001) and those with MCI (1.83 [95% CI 1.03-2.57 s], p < 0.00001) exhibited significantly longer times in the simple TUG test compared to healthy controls. The Dual-Task TUG test showed a stronger association with AD in the studies included in the analysis. AD participants demonstrated significantly longer test times (12.28 [95% CI 6.56-18.0 s], p < 0.0001) compared to cognitively normal controls.ConclusionsThis review highlights a potential association between TUG completion time and cognitive impairment in individuals with AD and MCI. The TUG test shows promise as a tool for the early identification and screening of cognitive decline and AD.
目的评价和估计老年人时间和围棋(TUG)测试成绩与轻度认知障碍(MCI)或阿尔茨海默病(AD)的关系。方法采用系统综述和荟萃分析方法,综合研究成人受试者的TUG测试分数与AD或MCI之间关系的研究数据。检索策略应用于MEDLINE (OVID)、Web of Science、Scopus、LILACS和Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Central)。根据预先确定的纳入标准选择研究。在荟萃分析中,使用随机效应模型汇总效应大小,以解释研究之间的异质性。采用I2统计量评估异质性,通过漏斗图分析评估发表偏倚。进行敏感性分析以检验结果的稳健性。结果本综述共纳入25项研究,其中15项纳入meta分析。AD患者(4.22 [95% CI 2.76-5.69 s], p < 0.00001)和MCI患者(1.83 [95% CI 1.03-2.57 s], p < 0.00001)在简单TUG测试中的时间明显长于健康对照。双任务TUG测试显示,在分析中包含的研究中,AD与双任务TUG有更强的关联。与认知正常的对照组相比,AD参与者的测试时间明显更长(12.28 [95% CI 6.56-18.0 s], p < 0.0001)。结论本综述强调了TUG完成时间与AD和MCI患者认知功能障碍之间的潜在关联。TUG测试有望成为早期识别和筛查认知能力下降和AD的工具。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Applied Gerontology (JAG) is the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society. It features articles that focus on research applications intended to improve the quality of life of older persons or to enhance our understanding of age-related issues that will eventually lead to such outcomes. We construe application broadly and encourage contributions across a range of applications toward those foci, including interventions, methodology, policy, and theory. Manuscripts from all disciplines represented in gerontology are welcome. Because the circulation and intended audience of JAG is global, contributions from international authors are encouraged.