Use of electrical stimulation therapy to reduce pain associated with hard-to-heal wounds and reduce reliance on pharmacological analgesics: a case series.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Maria Moon, Liz Hawes, Daphne Hazell
{"title":"Use of electrical stimulation therapy to reduce pain associated with hard-to-heal wounds and reduce reliance on pharmacological analgesics: a case series.","authors":"Maria Moon, Liz Hawes, Daphne Hazell","doi":"10.12968/jowc.2024.0235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the effect of microcurrent electrical stimulation therapy (EST) on pain from hard-to-heal wounds and quantity/type of analgesic needed in its management.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Patients with painful, stalled leg ulcers were treated with microcurrent EST. Pain scores (0-10 on a numerical rating scale (NRS)) and analgesic consumption were recorded daily for a seven-day run-in period and during treatment with EST for 24 days. Patients were followed up for six months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 20 patients in the experimental cohort. The median wound duration was nine months (range: 1.5-60 months); wounds included venous (14/20), arterial (5/20) and mixed aetiology (1/20) ulcers. Mean wound pain reduced significantly, from a value of 5.7 at baseline to 3.7 after 24 days of treatment (n=20; p<0.0001). Median time to achieve no/mild pain (NRS 0-4) was five weeks after the start of treatment. The median number of analgesics being taken for wound pain reduced between baseline and end of treatment from 2 to 1 (range: 0-4 at both timepoints). Mean daily dose reductions were observed for gabapentin, ibuprofen and paracetamol. Among patients taking analgesics for wound pain at baseline, 3/19 were able to discontinue all analgesia. After initiation of EST, the mean wound size reduction was 41% over four weeks, (10.2% reduction per week). The median time to healing was 18 weeks.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this clinical evaluation, patients treated with microcurrent EST reported reduction in pain and reduced analgesic consumption.</p>","PeriodicalId":17590,"journal":{"name":"Journal of wound care","volume":"34 11","pages":"932-940"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of wound care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2024.0235","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the effect of microcurrent electrical stimulation therapy (EST) on pain from hard-to-heal wounds and quantity/type of analgesic needed in its management.

Method: Patients with painful, stalled leg ulcers were treated with microcurrent EST. Pain scores (0-10 on a numerical rating scale (NRS)) and analgesic consumption were recorded daily for a seven-day run-in period and during treatment with EST for 24 days. Patients were followed up for six months.

Results: There were 20 patients in the experimental cohort. The median wound duration was nine months (range: 1.5-60 months); wounds included venous (14/20), arterial (5/20) and mixed aetiology (1/20) ulcers. Mean wound pain reduced significantly, from a value of 5.7 at baseline to 3.7 after 24 days of treatment (n=20; p<0.0001). Median time to achieve no/mild pain (NRS 0-4) was five weeks after the start of treatment. The median number of analgesics being taken for wound pain reduced between baseline and end of treatment from 2 to 1 (range: 0-4 at both timepoints). Mean daily dose reductions were observed for gabapentin, ibuprofen and paracetamol. Among patients taking analgesics for wound pain at baseline, 3/19 were able to discontinue all analgesia. After initiation of EST, the mean wound size reduction was 41% over four weeks, (10.2% reduction per week). The median time to healing was 18 weeks.

Conclusion: In this clinical evaluation, patients treated with microcurrent EST reported reduction in pain and reduced analgesic consumption.

使用电刺激疗法减轻与难以愈合的伤口相关的疼痛并减少对药物止痛剂的依赖:一个病例系列。
目的:探讨微电流电刺激疗法(EST)对难愈合创面疼痛的治疗效果及镇痛药的用量和种类。方法:采用微电流EST治疗疼痛、停滞的腿部溃疡患者。在7天的磨合期和24天的EST治疗期间,每天记录疼痛评分(数值评定量表(NRS) 0-10分)和止痛药消耗。患者随访6个月。结果:实验队列共20例患者。中位创面时间为9个月(1.5 ~ 60个月);伤口包括静脉溃疡(14/20)、动脉溃疡(5/20)和混合性溃疡(1/20)。平均伤口疼痛明显减轻,从基线值5.7降低到治疗24天后的3.7 (n=20)。结论:在这项临床评估中,接受微电流EST治疗的患者报告疼痛减轻,镇痛药消耗减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of wound care
Journal of wound care DERMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
10.50%
发文量
215
期刊介绍: Journal of Wound Care (JWC) is the definitive wound-care journal and the leading source of up-to-date research and clinical information on everything related to tissue viability. The journal was first launched in 1992 and aimed at catering to the needs of the multidisciplinary team. Published monthly, the journal’s international audience includes nurses, doctors and researchers specialising in wound management and tissue viability, as well as generalists wishing to enhance their practice. In addition to cutting edge and state-of-the-art research and practice articles, JWC also covers topics related to wound-care management, education and novel therapies, as well as JWC cases supplements, a supplement dedicated solely to case reports and case series in wound care. All articles are rigorously peer-reviewed by a panel of international experts, comprised of clinicians, nurses and researchers. Specifically, JWC publishes: High quality evidence on all aspects of wound care, including leg ulcers, pressure ulcers, the diabetic foot, burns, surgical wounds, wound infection and more The latest developments and innovations in wound care through both preclinical and preliminary clinical trials of potential new treatments worldwide In-depth prospective studies of new treatment applications, as well as high-level research evidence on existing treatments Clinical case studies providing information on how to deal with complex wounds Comprehensive literature reviews on current concepts and practice, including cost-effectiveness Updates on the activities of wound care societies around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书