Animal Welfare as an Essential Element of One Health

Philip Lymbery
{"title":"Animal Welfare as an Essential Element of One Health","authors":"Philip Lymbery","doi":"10.1002/aro2.70021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Animal welfare is a crucial component of the One Health principle, which the World Health Organization (WHO) describes as “an integrated, unifying approach that aims to sustainably balance and optimize the health of people, animals, and ecosystems. It recognizes that the health of humans, domestic and wild animals, plants, and the wider environment (including ecosystems) are closely linked and interdependent.” (WHO, 2025) [<span>1</span>].</p><p>The relationship between humans and animals is multifaceted, encompassing emotional, economic, and social dimensions. Companion animals, such as dogs and cats, provide emotional support and improve mental health, reducing stress and loneliness. Working animals, such as horses and oxen, are indispensable in many agricultural communities, aiding in transportation and farming tasks. Ensuring their welfare directly impacts human livelihoods and economic stability. Perhaps the biggest area of human–animal interrelationship is in agriculture, where 92 billion land animals are produced worldwide every year for food.</p><p>Ensuring the well-being of animals is essential for several reasons. Firstly, animals can act as reservoirs for pathogens that may transmit to humans, leading to zoonotic diseases. By prioritizing animal welfare, we can reduce the risk of disease transmission and safeguard public health. Healthy animals are more resilient to infections, which minimizes the spread of diseases within animal populations and reduces the need for antimicrobial interventions.</p><p>This is particularly important in the context of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), a growing global health threat. Nearly three-quarters of all the world's antibiotics are fed to farmed animals, largely to control diseases inherent in the cramped, squalid conditions of industrial animal agriculture. This is a major reason for the WHO to warn that action is needed if we are to avoid a post-antibiotic era, where diseases that are currently treatable could once again kill. Experts suggest that by the middle of the century, the demise of antibiotics could lead to about 10 million deaths a year [<span>2, 3</span>].</p><p>More than 60% of new and emerging infectious diseases that threaten human health originate in animal populations. These threats are significantly increasing in frequency and severity over time, with tremendous long-term impacts [<span>4</span>].</p><p>COVID-19 is the latest example of a major pandemic caused by a zoonotic pathogen. However, there are many other zoonoses, including severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS-CoV), zoonotic influenza (H5N1, H7N9, H1N1), Zika, and Ebola virus diseases, which have or could potentially cause epidemics in humans.</p><p>The traditional single health system has not been effective at addressing these challenges. Outbreaks of infectious diseases in different species and regions not only pose a serious threat to human and animal health and survival but also cause huge economic losses. In addition, the incidence of foodborne disease continues to increase and has become another public health crisis that cannot be ignored.</p><p>The ethical treatment of animals reflects our societal values and moral responsibilities. As sentient beings, animals deserve to live free from suffering. This ethical stance is not only a moral obligation but also fosters a culture of empathy and compassion, which can extend to human interactions and societal norms.</p><p>Animal welfare is about ensuring the well-being of the individual animal. This involves the physical and mental well-being of the animal, as well as allowing for the expression of normal behaviors.</p><p>The welfare of an animal, therefore, can be described as good or high if the individual is fit, healthy, and happy.</p><p>Truly high animal welfare is more than the absence of suffering: It should allow animals to enjoy positive experiences summed up in the phrase, the joy of life.</p><p>The ethical treatment of animals in agriculture can enhance the quality, safety, health, and nutritional qualities of the food for consumers.</p><p>Truly high standards of animal welfare also support biodiversity conservation by protecting wildlife and their habitats. Healthy wildlife populations contribute to balanced ecosystems, which provide essential services, such as pollination, water purification, and climate regulation. Protecting animal welfare through nature-positive, high animal welfare farming practices ensures the stability and resilience of these ecosystems, which are crucial for the overall health of our planet.</p><p>Animal welfare is, therefore, integral to the One Health approach, as it promotes the health and well-being of all species, supports sustainable food production, and helps prevent the spread of infectious diseases.</p><p>The One Health concept has deep roots in ancient Chinese philosophy. Early in the Warring States period (475–221 BCE), Taoism believed that man and nature have the same origin and advocated for the peaceful coexistence of humans and nature [<span>5</span>]. It promoted treating humans, animals, plants, and the environment as a single entity for sustainable development, forming the cultural origin of China’s One Health development.</p><p>Clearly then, One Health is not new, but has become more important in recent years. This is because many factors have changed the interactions between people, animals, and our environment.</p><p>The way we produce and consume food represents the biggest single interaction between humans and animals, meaning that food systems are of the utmost importance to any consideration of One Health.</p><p>Global agrifood systems are now recognized as having a huge role to play in solving the existential threats now facing humanity from climate change, biodiversity loss, pollution, and growing health challenges.</p><p>This recognition is particularly clear through the shift in narrative enshrined at the UN Food Systems Summit of 2021, where many of the world's governments committed to taking action to transform the way we produce and consume food.</p><p>This was further deepened in 2023 at the climate negotiations in Dubai under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), which placed food system transformation firmly on the agenda. The UAE Declaration on Sustainable Agriculture, Resilient Food Systems, and Climate Action, signed by 134 heads of state at COP28, saw governments commit to “Revisit or orient policies and public support related to agriculture and food systems to promote activities which increase incomes, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and bolster resilience, productivity, livelihoods, nutrition, water efficiency and human, animal and ecosystem health while reducing food loss and waste, and ecosystem loss and degradation.” [<span>6</span>].</p><p>A successful transition toward sustainable, inclusive, and resilient food systems that could deliver a livable and equitable future for all people, animals, and the planet involves moving away from unhealthy and environmentally harmful agricultural practices, including industrial animal agriculture.</p><p>There should be a transition toward sustainable food systems based on nature-positive practices, such as agroecological and regenerative farming, with its primary aim of feeding people with healthy, nutritious food while protecting soil health and improving animal welfare.</p><p>Animal welfare must be seen as a key element of future-fit food systems and an essential metric of how successful we are being at moving toward the achievement of goals relating to sustainable development.</p><p>The most optimal transition is to move to farming practices that no longer confine animals to cages, crates, and confinement; instead, restore animals to the countryside as part of mixed, rotational, agroecological, and regenerative farming. This provides scope for multiple health, environmental, and animal welfare benefits through farming in harmony with nature. Embracing farming systems based not on cruelty, extraction, and decline, but on putting back into nature's bank account. Respecting the welfare of animals and their wants, needs, and feelings.</p><p>Over the last 35 years, I have made it a professional priority to see as many different types of animal farming as possible, including those industrial farms that are harmful to animal health and welfare.</p><p>Industrial animal agriculture, or “factory” farming, involves hundreds, thousands, and sometimes tens of thousands of sentient creatures crowded together in barren and darkened barns, with many suffering in barren cages. Egg-laying hens, for example, are in cages too small to flap their wings. Pregnant pigs are often in crates where they cannot turn around for weeks or months at a time. Cows are kept in large numbers in grassless feedlots where they are fed grain instead of their natural diet of grass. Migratory salmon infested with lice and sores, in a sea cage with 50,000 others, swimming in incessant circles like crazed zoo animals.</p><p>Whatever the species, these captive animals exhibit repetitive behaviour, pointlessly doing things over and over out of boredom and frustration.</p><p>Nowhere is our tendency to treat farmed animals as machines more clearly seen than in our use of genetic selection to fine-tune animals for ever-faster growth rates and higher yields. This leads to painful welfare problems, including lameness and mastitis in dairy cows, increased mortality, leg disorders and heart failure, chronic hunger in broiler breeders, and bone fractures in egg-laying hens.</p><p>To all intents and purposes, factory-farmed animals are not living; they are “existing” from the moment they are born.</p><p>However, it does not have to be this way.</p><p>Animal welfare science increasingly recognizes that good welfare for farmed animals means they have an opportunity to enjoy their lives. A “good life” means that all their behavioral, physical, environmental, and mental needs must be met.</p><p>The Five Domains model of animal welfare, developed by Professor David Mellor and Dr. Cam Reid, provides a comprehensive framework for assessing animal welfare. It focuses on four physical domains: nutrition, environment, health, and behavior, and one mental domain: the animal’s mental state. This model emphasizes that both positive and negative experiences impact an animal’s overall welfare.</p><p>It highlights the importance of providing animals with opportunities for positive experiences, such as social interactions and environmental enrichment, to ensure a good quality of life. The model has been widely adopted for evaluating welfare in various contexts, including research and agriculture [<span>7-9</span>].</p><p>What the Five Domains model demonstrates is that animal welfare, and thereby sustainable development, is best served by systemic changes away from industrial animal agriculture.</p><p>One Health promoting nature-positive, regenerative, or agroecological farming involves restoring animals to the land as rotational grazers or foragers where they can express their natural behaviours—running, flapping, and grazing—making for happier animals with better health too.</p><p>These farming methods maximize One Health in a range of different ways, not least through high animal welfare. They also cut reliance on chemical pesticides, fertilizers, and antibiotics, reducing costs to farmers and creating a varied landscape bursting with wildflowers that lure back pollinating insects such as bumblebees, as well as providing seeds and insects for birds and other wildlife.</p><p>The One Health approach underscores the necessity of interdisciplinary collaboration. Veterinarians, medical professionals, environmental scientists, and policymakers must work together to address the complex challenges at the intersection of human, animal, and environmental health. This collaborative effort is essential for developing and implementing effective strategies to improve animal welfare and, consequently, public health.</p><p>Education and awareness are also critical components of promoting animal welfare. Public education campaigns can inform communities about the importance of humane treatment of animals and the benefits of good animal welfare practices. Schools, universities, and community organizations can play a pivotal role in fostering a culture of respect and care for animals.</p><p>Legislation and policy play a vital role in ensuring animal welfare and sustainable development, not least through the transformation of agrifood systems. Governments must enact and enforce laws that protect animal welfare as part of creating future-fit food and farming practices that deliver One Health goals.</p><p><b>Philip Lymbery:</b> conceptualization, methodology, investigation, validation, writing – original draft, writing – review and editing, visualization, resources, formal analysis, funding acquisition, data curation.</p><p>The author declares no conflicts of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":100086,"journal":{"name":"Animal Research and One Health","volume":"3 4","pages":"454-457"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aro2.70021","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Research and One Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aro2.70021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Animal welfare is a crucial component of the One Health principle, which the World Health Organization (WHO) describes as “an integrated, unifying approach that aims to sustainably balance and optimize the health of people, animals, and ecosystems. It recognizes that the health of humans, domestic and wild animals, plants, and the wider environment (including ecosystems) are closely linked and interdependent.” (WHO, 2025) [1].

The relationship between humans and animals is multifaceted, encompassing emotional, economic, and social dimensions. Companion animals, such as dogs and cats, provide emotional support and improve mental health, reducing stress and loneliness. Working animals, such as horses and oxen, are indispensable in many agricultural communities, aiding in transportation and farming tasks. Ensuring their welfare directly impacts human livelihoods and economic stability. Perhaps the biggest area of human–animal interrelationship is in agriculture, where 92 billion land animals are produced worldwide every year for food.

Ensuring the well-being of animals is essential for several reasons. Firstly, animals can act as reservoirs for pathogens that may transmit to humans, leading to zoonotic diseases. By prioritizing animal welfare, we can reduce the risk of disease transmission and safeguard public health. Healthy animals are more resilient to infections, which minimizes the spread of diseases within animal populations and reduces the need for antimicrobial interventions.

This is particularly important in the context of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), a growing global health threat. Nearly three-quarters of all the world's antibiotics are fed to farmed animals, largely to control diseases inherent in the cramped, squalid conditions of industrial animal agriculture. This is a major reason for the WHO to warn that action is needed if we are to avoid a post-antibiotic era, where diseases that are currently treatable could once again kill. Experts suggest that by the middle of the century, the demise of antibiotics could lead to about 10 million deaths a year [2, 3].

More than 60% of new and emerging infectious diseases that threaten human health originate in animal populations. These threats are significantly increasing in frequency and severity over time, with tremendous long-term impacts [4].

COVID-19 is the latest example of a major pandemic caused by a zoonotic pathogen. However, there are many other zoonoses, including severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS-CoV), zoonotic influenza (H5N1, H7N9, H1N1), Zika, and Ebola virus diseases, which have or could potentially cause epidemics in humans.

The traditional single health system has not been effective at addressing these challenges. Outbreaks of infectious diseases in different species and regions not only pose a serious threat to human and animal health and survival but also cause huge economic losses. In addition, the incidence of foodborne disease continues to increase and has become another public health crisis that cannot be ignored.

The ethical treatment of animals reflects our societal values and moral responsibilities. As sentient beings, animals deserve to live free from suffering. This ethical stance is not only a moral obligation but also fosters a culture of empathy and compassion, which can extend to human interactions and societal norms.

Animal welfare is about ensuring the well-being of the individual animal. This involves the physical and mental well-being of the animal, as well as allowing for the expression of normal behaviors.

The welfare of an animal, therefore, can be described as good or high if the individual is fit, healthy, and happy.

Truly high animal welfare is more than the absence of suffering: It should allow animals to enjoy positive experiences summed up in the phrase, the joy of life.

The ethical treatment of animals in agriculture can enhance the quality, safety, health, and nutritional qualities of the food for consumers.

Truly high standards of animal welfare also support biodiversity conservation by protecting wildlife and their habitats. Healthy wildlife populations contribute to balanced ecosystems, which provide essential services, such as pollination, water purification, and climate regulation. Protecting animal welfare through nature-positive, high animal welfare farming practices ensures the stability and resilience of these ecosystems, which are crucial for the overall health of our planet.

Animal welfare is, therefore, integral to the One Health approach, as it promotes the health and well-being of all species, supports sustainable food production, and helps prevent the spread of infectious diseases.

The One Health concept has deep roots in ancient Chinese philosophy. Early in the Warring States period (475–221 BCE), Taoism believed that man and nature have the same origin and advocated for the peaceful coexistence of humans and nature [5]. It promoted treating humans, animals, plants, and the environment as a single entity for sustainable development, forming the cultural origin of China’s One Health development.

Clearly then, One Health is not new, but has become more important in recent years. This is because many factors have changed the interactions between people, animals, and our environment.

The way we produce and consume food represents the biggest single interaction between humans and animals, meaning that food systems are of the utmost importance to any consideration of One Health.

Global agrifood systems are now recognized as having a huge role to play in solving the existential threats now facing humanity from climate change, biodiversity loss, pollution, and growing health challenges.

This recognition is particularly clear through the shift in narrative enshrined at the UN Food Systems Summit of 2021, where many of the world's governments committed to taking action to transform the way we produce and consume food.

This was further deepened in 2023 at the climate negotiations in Dubai under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), which placed food system transformation firmly on the agenda. The UAE Declaration on Sustainable Agriculture, Resilient Food Systems, and Climate Action, signed by 134 heads of state at COP28, saw governments commit to “Revisit or orient policies and public support related to agriculture and food systems to promote activities which increase incomes, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and bolster resilience, productivity, livelihoods, nutrition, water efficiency and human, animal and ecosystem health while reducing food loss and waste, and ecosystem loss and degradation.” [6].

A successful transition toward sustainable, inclusive, and resilient food systems that could deliver a livable and equitable future for all people, animals, and the planet involves moving away from unhealthy and environmentally harmful agricultural practices, including industrial animal agriculture.

There should be a transition toward sustainable food systems based on nature-positive practices, such as agroecological and regenerative farming, with its primary aim of feeding people with healthy, nutritious food while protecting soil health and improving animal welfare.

Animal welfare must be seen as a key element of future-fit food systems and an essential metric of how successful we are being at moving toward the achievement of goals relating to sustainable development.

The most optimal transition is to move to farming practices that no longer confine animals to cages, crates, and confinement; instead, restore animals to the countryside as part of mixed, rotational, agroecological, and regenerative farming. This provides scope for multiple health, environmental, and animal welfare benefits through farming in harmony with nature. Embracing farming systems based not on cruelty, extraction, and decline, but on putting back into nature's bank account. Respecting the welfare of animals and their wants, needs, and feelings.

Over the last 35 years, I have made it a professional priority to see as many different types of animal farming as possible, including those industrial farms that are harmful to animal health and welfare.

Industrial animal agriculture, or “factory” farming, involves hundreds, thousands, and sometimes tens of thousands of sentient creatures crowded together in barren and darkened barns, with many suffering in barren cages. Egg-laying hens, for example, are in cages too small to flap their wings. Pregnant pigs are often in crates where they cannot turn around for weeks or months at a time. Cows are kept in large numbers in grassless feedlots where they are fed grain instead of their natural diet of grass. Migratory salmon infested with lice and sores, in a sea cage with 50,000 others, swimming in incessant circles like crazed zoo animals.

Whatever the species, these captive animals exhibit repetitive behaviour, pointlessly doing things over and over out of boredom and frustration.

Nowhere is our tendency to treat farmed animals as machines more clearly seen than in our use of genetic selection to fine-tune animals for ever-faster growth rates and higher yields. This leads to painful welfare problems, including lameness and mastitis in dairy cows, increased mortality, leg disorders and heart failure, chronic hunger in broiler breeders, and bone fractures in egg-laying hens.

To all intents and purposes, factory-farmed animals are not living; they are “existing” from the moment they are born.

However, it does not have to be this way.

Animal welfare science increasingly recognizes that good welfare for farmed animals means they have an opportunity to enjoy their lives. A “good life” means that all their behavioral, physical, environmental, and mental needs must be met.

The Five Domains model of animal welfare, developed by Professor David Mellor and Dr. Cam Reid, provides a comprehensive framework for assessing animal welfare. It focuses on four physical domains: nutrition, environment, health, and behavior, and one mental domain: the animal’s mental state. This model emphasizes that both positive and negative experiences impact an animal’s overall welfare.

It highlights the importance of providing animals with opportunities for positive experiences, such as social interactions and environmental enrichment, to ensure a good quality of life. The model has been widely adopted for evaluating welfare in various contexts, including research and agriculture [7-9].

What the Five Domains model demonstrates is that animal welfare, and thereby sustainable development, is best served by systemic changes away from industrial animal agriculture.

One Health promoting nature-positive, regenerative, or agroecological farming involves restoring animals to the land as rotational grazers or foragers where they can express their natural behaviours—running, flapping, and grazing—making for happier animals with better health too.

These farming methods maximize One Health in a range of different ways, not least through high animal welfare. They also cut reliance on chemical pesticides, fertilizers, and antibiotics, reducing costs to farmers and creating a varied landscape bursting with wildflowers that lure back pollinating insects such as bumblebees, as well as providing seeds and insects for birds and other wildlife.

The One Health approach underscores the necessity of interdisciplinary collaboration. Veterinarians, medical professionals, environmental scientists, and policymakers must work together to address the complex challenges at the intersection of human, animal, and environmental health. This collaborative effort is essential for developing and implementing effective strategies to improve animal welfare and, consequently, public health.

Education and awareness are also critical components of promoting animal welfare. Public education campaigns can inform communities about the importance of humane treatment of animals and the benefits of good animal welfare practices. Schools, universities, and community organizations can play a pivotal role in fostering a culture of respect and care for animals.

Legislation and policy play a vital role in ensuring animal welfare and sustainable development, not least through the transformation of agrifood systems. Governments must enact and enforce laws that protect animal welfare as part of creating future-fit food and farming practices that deliver One Health goals.

Philip Lymbery: conceptualization, methodology, investigation, validation, writing – original draft, writing – review and editing, visualization, resources, formal analysis, funding acquisition, data curation.

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

动物福利是健康的基本要素
动物福利是“同一个健康”原则的重要组成部分,世界卫生组织(WHO)将其描述为“一种旨在可持续平衡和优化人、动物和生态系统健康的综合统一方法”。它承认人类健康、家畜和野生动物、植物以及更广泛的环境(包括生态系统)是密切联系和相互依存的。”(who, 2025) [1];人与动物之间的关系是多方面的,包括情感、经济和社会层面。伴侣动物,如狗和猫,提供情感支持,改善心理健康,减少压力和孤独感。劳动动物,如马和牛,在许多农业社区是必不可少的,帮助运输和农业任务。确保他们的福利直接关系到人类生计和经济稳定。也许人类与动物关系最大的领域是农业,全世界每年生产920亿只陆地动物作为食物。出于几个原因,确保动物的健康是必不可少的。首先,动物可以作为可能传播给人类的病原体的宿主,导致人畜共患疾病。通过优先考虑动物福利,我们可以减少疾病传播的风险,保障公众健康。健康的动物更能抵御感染,从而最大限度地减少疾病在动物种群中的传播,并减少对抗菌素干预措施的需求。这在抗菌素耐药性(AMR)这一日益严重的全球健康威胁的背景下尤为重要。世界上近四分之三的抗生素用于饲养动物,主要是为了控制工业化畜牧业狭窄、肮脏的环境所固有的疾病。这是世卫组织发出警告的主要原因,如果我们要避免进入后抗生素时代,目前可治疗的疾病可能再次致命,就需要采取行动。专家认为,到本世纪中叶,抗生素的消失可能导致每年约1000万人死亡[2,3]。威胁人类健康的60%以上的新发和新发传染病起源于动物种群。随着时间的推移,这些威胁的频率和严重程度都在显著增加,并产生了巨大的长期影响。COVID-19是由人畜共患病原体引起的重大大流行的最新例子。然而,还有许多其他人畜共患疾病,包括严重急性呼吸系统综合症(SARS)、中东呼吸综合征(MERS-CoV)、人畜共患流感(H5N1、H7N9、H1N1)、寨卡病毒和埃博拉病毒疾病,它们已经或可能在人类中引起流行病。传统的单一卫生系统未能有效应对这些挑战。传染病在不同物种和地区的暴发,不仅对人类和动物的健康和生存造成严重威胁,而且造成巨大的经济损失。此外,食源性疾病的发病率持续增加,已成为另一个不容忽视的公共卫生危机。善待动物反映了我们的社会价值观和道德责任。作为有情众生,动物理应免于痛苦。这种道德立场不仅是一种道德义务,而且还培养了一种同理心和同情心的文化,这种文化可以延伸到人际交往和社会规范中。动物福利是指确保动物个体的健康。这涉及到动物的身心健康,以及允许正常行为的表达。因此,如果一个动物是健康、健康和快乐的,那么它的福利就可以被描述为“好”或“高”。真正的高动物福利不仅仅是没有痛苦:它应该让动物享受积极的经历,概括起来就是生活的乐趣。在农业中对动物的道德待遇可以提高消费者食品的质量、安全、健康和营养品质。真正高标准的动物福利也通过保护野生动物及其栖息地来支持生物多样性保护。健康的野生动物种群有助于平衡生态系统,提供授粉、水净化和气候调节等基本服务。通过对自然有利的、高动物福利的养殖方式来保护动物福利,可以确保这些生态系统的稳定性和复原力,这对我们地球的整体健康至关重要。因此,动物福利是“同一个健康”方法的组成部分,因为它促进了所有物种的健康和福祉,支持可持续的粮食生产,并有助于防止传染病的传播。“一体健康”理念深深植根于中国古代哲学。早在战国时期(公元前475-221年),道教就认为人与自然同宗同源,主张人与自然和平共处。 倡导将人、动物、植物和环境作为一个整体进行可持续发展,形成了中国“一个健康”发展的文化渊源。显然,“一体健康”并不新鲜,但近年来变得越来越重要。这是因为许多因素改变了人、动物和环境之间的相互作用。我们生产和消费食物的方式代表了人类与动物之间最大的单一互动,这意味着食物系统对任何考虑“同一个健康”的方式都至关重要。全球农业粮食系统现在被认为在解决人类面临的生存威胁方面发挥着巨大作用,这些威胁包括气候变化、生物多样性丧失、污染和日益严重的健康挑战。在2021年联合国粮食系统首脑会议上,世界上许多政府承诺采取行动,改变我们生产和消费粮食的方式,这一点尤其明显。2023年在迪拜举行的《联合国气候变化框架公约》(UNFCCC)气候谈判进一步深化了这一点,将粮食体系转型牢牢地提上了议程。134位国家元首在第28届联合国气候变化大会上签署了《关于可持续农业、有抵御力的粮食系统和气候行动的阿联酋宣言》,各国政府承诺“重新审视或调整与农业和粮食系统有关的政策和公共支持,以促进增加收入、减少温室气体排放、增强抵御力、生产力、生计、营养、水效率以及人类、动物和生态系统健康的活动,同时减少粮食损失和浪费。以及生态系统的丧失和退化。”[6]。要成功转型为可持续、包容和有韧性的粮食系统,为所有人、动物和地球创造一个宜居和公平的未来,就必须摒弃不健康和对环境有害的农业做法,包括工业化畜牧业。应过渡到以生态农业和再生农业等对自然有益的做法为基础的可持续粮食系统,其主要目标是为人们提供健康、有营养的食物,同时保护土壤健康和改善动物福利。动物福利必须被视为适合未来的食品系统的关键要素,也是衡量我们在实现可持续发展目标方面取得多大成功的基本指标。最理想的转变是转向不再把动物关在笼子、板条箱和禁闭里的耕作方式;相反,将动物恢复到农村,作为混合、轮作、生态农业和再生农业的一部分。这为通过与自然和谐相处的农业实现多种健康、环境和动物福利提供了空间。拥抱农业系统,不是建立在残酷、榨取和衰退的基础上,而是建立在把钱放回大自然的银行账户上。尊重动物的福利和他们的需要、需要和感受。在过去的35年里,我一直把尽可能多地观察不同类型的动物养殖作为职业优先事项,包括那些对动物健康和福利有害的工业化农场。工业化的动物农业,或“工厂化”的农业,包括成百上千,有时甚至数以万计的有知觉的动物挤在一起,在贫瘠和黑暗的谷仓里,许多人在贫瘠的笼子里受苦。例如,蛋鸡被关在太小而不能扇动翅膀的笼子里。怀孕的猪通常被关在板条箱里,在那里它们几周或几个月都不能一次转身。牛被大量饲养在无草的饲养场,在那里它们被喂谷物而不是天然的草。满是虱子和疮的洄游鲑鱼,和其他5万只鲑鱼一起被关在一个海笼里,像疯狂的动物园动物一样不停地转圈游来游去。无论是什么物种,这些圈养的动物都会表现出重复的行为,出于无聊和沮丧而一遍又一遍地无意义地做事情。没有什么比我们利用基因选择来微调动物以获得更快的生长速度和更高的产量更能清楚地看到我们把养殖动物当作机器的倾向了。这导致了痛苦的福利问题,包括奶牛跛行和乳腺炎,死亡率增加,腿部疾病和心力衰竭,肉鸡饲养者长期饥饿,蛋鸡骨折。从所有的意图和目的来看,工厂化养殖的动物都不是活的;他们从出生的那一刻起就“存在”了。然而,它并不一定是这样的。动物福利科学越来越认识到,对农场动物的良好福利意味着它们有机会享受生活。“美好的生活”意味着他们所有的行为、身体、环境和精神需求都必须得到满足。由David Mellor教授和Cam Reid博士提出的动物福利五领域模型,为评估动物福利提供了一个全面的框架。 它关注四个物理领域:营养、环境、健康和行为,以及一个精神领域:动物的精神状态。这个模型强调积极和消极的经历都会影响动物的整体福利。它强调了为动物提供积极体验机会的重要性,例如社会互动和丰富环境,以确保良好的生活质量。该模型已被广泛用于各种情况下的福利评估,包括研究和农业[7-9]。“五大领域”模型表明,远离工业化畜牧业的系统性变革最有利于动物福利,从而促进可持续发展。One Health提倡自然积极、再生或农业生态农业,包括将动物恢复到土地上,使它们成为轮牧或觅食者,在那里它们可以表达自己的自然行为——奔跑、拍打和放牧——使动物更快乐,也更健康。这些养殖方法通过一系列不同的方式,尤其是通过高动物福利,最大限度地提高“同一个健康”。它们还减少了对化学农药、化肥和抗生素的依赖,降低了农民的成本,创造了一个充满野花的多样化景观,吸引了大黄蜂等传粉昆虫,并为鸟类和其他野生动物提供了种子和昆虫。“同一个健康”方针强调了跨学科合作的必要性。兽医、医疗专业人员、环境科学家和政策制定者必须共同努力,解决人类、动物和环境健康交叉领域的复杂挑战。这种协作努力对于制定和实施有效战略以改善动物福利,从而改善公共卫生至关重要。教育和意识也是促进动物福利的重要组成部分。公共教育活动可以使社区了解人道对待动物的重要性以及良好的动物福利做法的好处。学校、大学和社区组织可以在培养尊重和爱护动物的文化方面发挥关键作用。立法和政策在确保动物福利和可持续发展方面发挥着至关重要的作用,尤其是通过农业粮食系统的转型。政府必须制定和执行保护动物福利的法律,作为创造适合未来的食品和农业实践的一部分,以实现“同一个健康”的目标。Philip Lymbery:概念化,方法论,调查,验证,写作-原稿,写作-审查和编辑,可视化,资源,形式分析,资金获取,数据管理。作者声明无利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书