Gregory Kogan , Ashley Stampone , Douglas M. Boyle , Dana R. Hermanson
{"title":"Accounting theories: An introductory resource for new scholars","authors":"Gregory Kogan , Ashley Stampone , Douglas M. Boyle , Dana R. Hermanson","doi":"10.1016/j.jaccedu.2025.100990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Theory is central to accounting research, as it is used to explain and predict accounting-related behavior and phenomena. The number of theories is very large, and new accounting scholars must learn about key theories and how to apply theory to their own studies. We develop an introductory resource for new scholars by examining a broad sample of 1672 published articles and highlighting the most mentioned theories overall and by topic and method. Overall, the leading theory is agency theory. Other more common theories are institutional theory, prospect theory, social identity theory, attribution theory, social comparison theory, upper echelons theory, game theory, and positive accounting theory. For 17 of the most mentioned specific theories, we provide a description of the theory, a foundational resource and selected quotes, and examples of accounting articles that use the theory. We also provide some perspectives about using theory. We hope that this introductory resource will help new scholars as they begin to develop their understanding and use of theory. We also believe that this resource can be helpful to Master’s students and others seeking to read and understand accounting research articles.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":35578,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting Education","volume":"73 ","pages":"Article 100990"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Accounting Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748575125000417","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Theory is central to accounting research, as it is used to explain and predict accounting-related behavior and phenomena. The number of theories is very large, and new accounting scholars must learn about key theories and how to apply theory to their own studies. We develop an introductory resource for new scholars by examining a broad sample of 1672 published articles and highlighting the most mentioned theories overall and by topic and method. Overall, the leading theory is agency theory. Other more common theories are institutional theory, prospect theory, social identity theory, attribution theory, social comparison theory, upper echelons theory, game theory, and positive accounting theory. For 17 of the most mentioned specific theories, we provide a description of the theory, a foundational resource and selected quotes, and examples of accounting articles that use the theory. We also provide some perspectives about using theory. We hope that this introductory resource will help new scholars as they begin to develop their understanding and use of theory. We also believe that this resource can be helpful to Master’s students and others seeking to read and understand accounting research articles.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Accounting Education (JAEd) is a refereed journal dedicated to promoting and publishing research on accounting education issues and to improving the quality of accounting education worldwide. The Journal provides a vehicle for making results of empirical studies available to educators and for exchanging ideas, instructional resources, and best practices that help improve accounting education. The Journal includes four sections: a Main Articles Section, a Teaching and Educational Notes Section, an Educational Case Section, and a Best Practices Section. Manuscripts published in the Main Articles Section generally present results of empirical studies, although non-empirical papers (such as policy-related or essay papers) are sometimes published in this section. Papers published in the Teaching and Educational Notes Section include short empirical pieces (e.g., replications) as well as instructional resources that are not properly categorized as cases, which are published in a separate Case Section. Note: as part of the Teaching Note accompany educational cases, authors must include implementation guidance (based on actual case usage) and evidence regarding the efficacy of the case vis-a-vis a listing of educational objectives associated with the case. To meet the efficacy requirement, authors must include direct assessment (e.g grades by case requirement/objective or pre-post tests). Although interesting and encouraged, student perceptions (surveys) are considered indirect assessment and do not meet the efficacy requirement. The case must have been used more than once in a course to avoid potential anomalies and to vet the case before submission. Authors may be asked to collect additional data, depending on course size/circumstances.