Fueling the transition: The infrastructure and retrofitting hurdles to natural gas uptake

IF 5.2 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Energy for Sustainable Development Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-04 DOI:10.1016/j.esd.2025.101879
Majah-Leah V. Ravago , Karl Robert L. Jandoc , Brian Jason H. Ponce , Mithi Maria Peñaranda , Renzi G. Frias , Raul V. Fabella
{"title":"Fueling the transition: The infrastructure and retrofitting hurdles to natural gas uptake","authors":"Majah-Leah V. Ravago ,&nbsp;Karl Robert L. Jandoc ,&nbsp;Brian Jason H. Ponce ,&nbsp;Mithi Maria Peñaranda ,&nbsp;Renzi G. Frias ,&nbsp;Raul V. Fabella","doi":"10.1016/j.esd.2025.101879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We examine how technical characteristics influence firms' decisions to adopt natural gas as an alternative fuel in their production processes. Using firm-level data, we first identify key drivers of adoption through probit models, highlighting the roles of heating equipment, cost competitiveness, and prior knowledge of natural gas. To extend the analysis, we apply LASSO regression to incorporate a wider set of predictors, including infrastructure access, retrofitting costs, electricity source, environmental awareness, and firm characteristics. Our results show that proximity to fueling or regasification stations is strongly associated with a higher probability of adoption, while high retrofitting costs show a robust negative correlation. Firms reliant on major grid-based electricity providers or familiar with renewable energy sources are less open to switching, suggesting perceived reliability of existing energy sources or a preference for technologies more directly aligned with renewable commitments. Conversely, firm-level familiarity with natural gas consistently exhibits a positive and significant association with adoption. We observe moderate heterogeneity in openness to switch to natural gas across firm types, with the highest propensity among those using heating equipment in core operations. These findings emphasize the importance of infrastructure access, technical knowledge, and financial constraints in shaping the transition to cleaner fuels in industrial sectors. We highlight the “renewable energy commitment effect,” which is the reluctance to switch to a fuel less committed to renewables.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49209,"journal":{"name":"Energy for Sustainable Development","volume":"89 ","pages":"Article 101879"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy for Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0973082625002297","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We examine how technical characteristics influence firms' decisions to adopt natural gas as an alternative fuel in their production processes. Using firm-level data, we first identify key drivers of adoption through probit models, highlighting the roles of heating equipment, cost competitiveness, and prior knowledge of natural gas. To extend the analysis, we apply LASSO regression to incorporate a wider set of predictors, including infrastructure access, retrofitting costs, electricity source, environmental awareness, and firm characteristics. Our results show that proximity to fueling or regasification stations is strongly associated with a higher probability of adoption, while high retrofitting costs show a robust negative correlation. Firms reliant on major grid-based electricity providers or familiar with renewable energy sources are less open to switching, suggesting perceived reliability of existing energy sources or a preference for technologies more directly aligned with renewable commitments. Conversely, firm-level familiarity with natural gas consistently exhibits a positive and significant association with adoption. We observe moderate heterogeneity in openness to switch to natural gas across firm types, with the highest propensity among those using heating equipment in core operations. These findings emphasize the importance of infrastructure access, technical knowledge, and financial constraints in shaping the transition to cleaner fuels in industrial sectors. We highlight the “renewable energy commitment effect,” which is the reluctance to switch to a fuel less committed to renewables.
推动转型:基础设施和改造障碍对天然气的吸收
我们研究了技术特征如何影响企业在生产过程中采用天然气作为替代燃料的决策。利用公司层面的数据,我们首先通过probit模型确定了采用该技术的关键驱动因素,强调了供暖设备、成本竞争力和天然气先验知识的作用。为了扩展分析,我们应用LASSO回归来纳入更广泛的预测因素,包括基础设施获取、改造成本、电力来源、环境意识和企业特征。我们的研究结果表明,靠近加氢站或再气化站与更高的采用概率密切相关,而高改造成本则表现出强烈的负相关。依赖主要电网供电供应商或熟悉可再生能源的公司不太愿意转换,这表明现有能源的可靠性或对更直接符合可再生能源承诺的技术的偏好。相反,公司层面对天然气的熟悉程度始终与采用率呈显著正相关。我们观察到,不同类型的公司在转向天然气的开放程度上存在适度的异质性,在核心业务中使用加热设备的公司中,倾向程度最高。这些研究结果强调了基础设施获取、技术知识和资金限制对工业部门向清洁燃料过渡的重要性。我们强调了“可再生能源承诺效应”,即不愿转向可再生能源承诺较少的燃料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy for Sustainable Development
Energy for Sustainable Development ENERGY & FUELS-ENERGY & FUELS
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
187
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the International Energy Initiative, Energy for Sustainable Development is the journal for decision makers, managers, consultants, policy makers, planners and researchers in both government and non-government organizations. It publishes original research and reviews about energy in developing countries, sustainable development, energy resources, technologies, policies and interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书