Exposure to images of post-bushfire disaster impacts fear learning and extinction

IF 4.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Behaviour Research and Therapy Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-05 DOI:10.1016/j.brat.2025.104911
Lindsey J. Franklin-Browne , Kathryn L. Modecki , Allison M. Waters
{"title":"Exposure to images of post-bushfire disaster impacts fear learning and extinction","authors":"Lindsey J. Franklin-Browne ,&nbsp;Kathryn L. Modecki ,&nbsp;Allison M. Waters","doi":"10.1016/j.brat.2025.104911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Exposure to natural disasters, such as bushfires, increases vulnerability for poor psychological outcomes. Large scale reviews have increased our understanding of risk factors associated with disaster related maladjustment, however this relationship remains unclear. This study examined the effect of exposure to resource loss in the post-bushfire disaster environment on fear learning and extinction pathways. Participants (70 adults; 73 % female, 17–58 years of age, <em>M</em> = 23.77, <em>SD</em> = 8.16) were randomly allocated to view scenes depicting post-bushfire resource loss (post-bushfire disaster group) or no disaster (community group) followed by all participants completing a discriminative Pavlovian conditioning task including habituation, conditioning, extinction, and retest phases. During acquisition, one shape (CS+) was paired with an aversive tone as the unconditioned stimulus (UCS) and another shape (CS-) was presented alone, while both CSs were presented alone during extinction and retest phases. Subjective ratings of fear, worry and sadness, were obtained before and after picture viewing and between learning task phases whilst ratings of CS pleasantness and arousal were obtained before and after learning task phases. Skin conductance responses (SCR) were recorded to the CSs during all phases. The post-bushfire disaster group reported more subjective fear, worry and sadness after viewing images relative to the community group. The post-bushfire disaster group also showed significantly larger orienting SCRs to both CSs during acquisition relative to the community group and significantly smaller orienting SCRs to both CSs and undifferentiated anticipatory SCRs during extinction relative to the community group. During retest, the post-bushfire disaster group exhibited significantly larger anticipatory SCRs to both CSs compared to the community group. There were no group differences in between phase ratings of CS+ and CS- unpleasantness and arousal and no group differences in subjective anxiety ratings between learning task phases. Exposure to post-bushfire resource loss may increase fear conditioning and generalisation to safe stimuli, impair safety learning, and increase reactivity when re-exposed to fear stimuli.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48457,"journal":{"name":"Behaviour Research and Therapy","volume":"195 ","pages":"Article 104911"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behaviour Research and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005796725002335","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Exposure to natural disasters, such as bushfires, increases vulnerability for poor psychological outcomes. Large scale reviews have increased our understanding of risk factors associated with disaster related maladjustment, however this relationship remains unclear. This study examined the effect of exposure to resource loss in the post-bushfire disaster environment on fear learning and extinction pathways. Participants (70 adults; 73 % female, 17–58 years of age, M = 23.77, SD = 8.16) were randomly allocated to view scenes depicting post-bushfire resource loss (post-bushfire disaster group) or no disaster (community group) followed by all participants completing a discriminative Pavlovian conditioning task including habituation, conditioning, extinction, and retest phases. During acquisition, one shape (CS+) was paired with an aversive tone as the unconditioned stimulus (UCS) and another shape (CS-) was presented alone, while both CSs were presented alone during extinction and retest phases. Subjective ratings of fear, worry and sadness, were obtained before and after picture viewing and between learning task phases whilst ratings of CS pleasantness and arousal were obtained before and after learning task phases. Skin conductance responses (SCR) were recorded to the CSs during all phases. The post-bushfire disaster group reported more subjective fear, worry and sadness after viewing images relative to the community group. The post-bushfire disaster group also showed significantly larger orienting SCRs to both CSs during acquisition relative to the community group and significantly smaller orienting SCRs to both CSs and undifferentiated anticipatory SCRs during extinction relative to the community group. During retest, the post-bushfire disaster group exhibited significantly larger anticipatory SCRs to both CSs compared to the community group. There were no group differences in between phase ratings of CS+ and CS- unpleasantness and arousal and no group differences in subjective anxiety ratings between learning task phases. Exposure to post-bushfire resource loss may increase fear conditioning and generalisation to safe stimuli, impair safety learning, and increase reactivity when re-exposed to fear stimuli.
接触森林大火后的图像会影响恐惧学习和灭绝
暴露于自然灾害,如森林大火,增加了心理结果不佳的脆弱性。大规模的回顾增加了我们对与灾害相关的适应不良相关的风险因素的理解,然而这种关系仍然不清楚。本研究考察了森林大火后环境中资源损失暴露对恐惧学习和灭绝途径的影响。参与者(70名成年人,其中73%为女性,17-58岁,M = 23.77, SD = 8.16)被随机分配到描述森林大火后资源损失的场景(森林大火后灾难组)或没有灾难的场景(社区组),然后所有参与者完成一个歧视的巴甫洛夫条件反射任务,包括习惯化、条件反射、消失和重新测试阶段。在获取过程中,一种形状(CS+)与反感音调配对作为非条件刺激(UCS),另一种形状(CS-)单独呈现,而在消光和重测阶段,两种形状均单独呈现。在观看图片前后和学习任务阶段之间分别获得了恐惧、担忧和悲伤的主观评分,而在学习任务阶段前后分别获得了CS愉悦和唤醒的评分。在所有阶段记录皮肤电导反应(SCR)。与社区小组相比,森林大火后的小组在观看图像后报告了更多的主观恐惧、担忧和悲伤。与群落相比,林火灾害后群体在获取过程中对两种类型的scr取向均显著增大,在灭绝过程中对两种类型和未分化预期scr取向均显著减小。在复测过程中,山火灾害后组对两种CSs的预期scr均显著高于社区组。CS+和CS-不愉快和觉醒的阶段评分之间没有组间差异,学习任务阶段之间的主观焦虑评分没有组间差异。暴露于森林大火后的资源损失可能会增加对安全刺激的恐惧条件反射和泛化,损害安全学习,并增加再次暴露于恐惧刺激时的反应性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Behaviour Research and Therapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
7.30%
发文量
148
期刊介绍: The major focus of Behaviour Research and Therapy is an experimental psychopathology approach to understanding emotional and behavioral disorders and their prevention and treatment, using cognitive, behavioral, and psychophysiological (including neural) methods and models. This includes laboratory-based experimental studies with healthy, at risk and subclinical individuals that inform clinical application as well as studies with clinically severe samples. The following types of submissions are encouraged: theoretical reviews of mechanisms that contribute to psychopathology and that offer new treatment targets; tests of novel, mechanistically focused psychological interventions, especially ones that include theory-driven or experimentally-derived predictors, moderators and mediators; and innovations in dissemination and implementation of evidence-based practices into clinical practice in psychology and associated fields, especially those that target underlying mechanisms or focus on novel approaches to treatment delivery. In addition to traditional psychological disorders, the scope of the journal includes behavioural medicine (e.g., chronic pain). The journal will not consider manuscripts dealing primarily with measurement, psychometric analyses, and personality assessment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书