Type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus among people with intellectual disability in comparison to the general population: A register study (IDcare)

IF 2.2 Q4 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Diabetes epidemiology and management Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-07 DOI:10.1016/j.deman.2025.100290
Karin Engström , Magnus Sandberg , Anna Axmon
{"title":"Type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus among people with intellectual disability in comparison to the general population: A register study (IDcare)","authors":"Karin Engström ,&nbsp;Magnus Sandberg ,&nbsp;Anna Axmon","doi":"10.1016/j.deman.2025.100290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><div>To assess the prevalence and prevalence relative risk (PRR) of Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) among people with intellectual disabilities (ID) compared to the general population using a register-based cohort in Sweden.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The study included 14,716 people with ID and 1226,955 people from the general population in Skåne, Sweden, on January 1st, 2014. Data on health care contacts were collected from the Skåne Healthcare Register for the entire study period (2014–2021). PRRs with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using Poisson regression, with the general population serving as the reference group.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The PRR for T1DM was higher among people with ID (PRR 1.63, 95 % CI 1.36–1.95), particularly among children and adolescents. The PRR for T2DM was also higher (PRR 1.53, 95 % CI 1.43–1.63) across all age groups, except for children. Women had higher PRRs (T1DM: PRR 1.88, 95 % CI 1.42–2.47; T2DM: PRR 1.80, 95 % CI 1.63–1.99) than men (T1DM: PRR 1.44, 95 % CI 1.13–1.82; T2DM: PRR 1.34, 95 % CI 1.22–1.48). The PRR increased with ID severity for T1DM, whereas a higher PRR was observed among people with mild or moderate ID for T2DM, but not among those with severe/profound ID.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>People with ID have higher prevalence relative risks for both T1DM and T2DM, indicating a higher diabetes burden than in the general population. Differences in PRR between T1DM and T2DM, according to age, sex, and ID severity, underscore the need for targeted interventions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72796,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes epidemiology and management","volume":"19 ","pages":"Article 100290"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes epidemiology and management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666970625000381","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims

To assess the prevalence and prevalence relative risk (PRR) of Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) among people with intellectual disabilities (ID) compared to the general population using a register-based cohort in Sweden.

Methods

The study included 14,716 people with ID and 1226,955 people from the general population in Skåne, Sweden, on January 1st, 2014. Data on health care contacts were collected from the Skåne Healthcare Register for the entire study period (2014–2021). PRRs with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using Poisson regression, with the general population serving as the reference group.

Results

The PRR for T1DM was higher among people with ID (PRR 1.63, 95 % CI 1.36–1.95), particularly among children and adolescents. The PRR for T2DM was also higher (PRR 1.53, 95 % CI 1.43–1.63) across all age groups, except for children. Women had higher PRRs (T1DM: PRR 1.88, 95 % CI 1.42–2.47; T2DM: PRR 1.80, 95 % CI 1.63–1.99) than men (T1DM: PRR 1.44, 95 % CI 1.13–1.82; T2DM: PRR 1.34, 95 % CI 1.22–1.48). The PRR increased with ID severity for T1DM, whereas a higher PRR was observed among people with mild or moderate ID for T2DM, but not among those with severe/profound ID.

Conclusions

People with ID have higher prevalence relative risks for both T1DM and T2DM, indicating a higher diabetes burden than in the general population. Differences in PRR between T1DM and T2DM, according to age, sex, and ID severity, underscore the need for targeted interventions.
智障人群中1型和2型糖尿病与普通人群的比较:一项登记研究(IDcare)
目的:通过瑞典的一项基于登记的队列研究,评估智力残疾(ID)人群中1型糖尿病(T1DM)和2型糖尿病(T2DM)的患病率和患病率相对危险度(PRR)。方法选取2014年1月1日在瑞典sk内的14716名ID人群和1226955名普通人群为研究对象。在整个研究期间(2014-2021年),从skamatne医疗保健登记册收集医疗保健接触者的数据。使用泊松回归估计95%置信区间(ci)的PRRs,以一般人群作为参照组。结果ID患者T1DM的PRR较高(PRR为1.63,95% CI为1.36-1.95),尤其是儿童和青少年。除儿童外,T2DM的PRR在所有年龄组中也较高(PRR 1.53, 95% CI 1.43-1.63)。女性的PRR (T1DM: PRR 1.88, 95% CI 1.42-2.47; T2DM: PRR 1.80, 95% CI 1.63-1.99)高于男性(T1DM: PRR 1.44, 95% CI 1.13-1.82; T2DM: PRR 1.34, 95% CI 1.22-1.48)。T1DM患者的PRR随着ID严重程度的增加而增加,而T2DM轻度或中度ID患者的PRR更高,而重度/重度ID患者的PRR则不高。结论ID患者患T1DM和T2DM的相对风险较高,表明其糖尿病负担高于一般人群。根据年龄、性别和ID严重程度,T1DM和T2DM之间PRR的差异强调了有针对性干预的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diabetes epidemiology and management
Diabetes epidemiology and management Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Public Health and Health Policy
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书