Landscape and grazing management affect dung beetle communities in California

IF 4.2 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Basic and Applied Ecology Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-25 DOI:10.1016/j.baae.2025.10.012
Suzanne Lipton , Paul E. Skelley , Stacy M. Philpott
{"title":"Landscape and grazing management affect dung beetle communities in California","authors":"Suzanne Lipton ,&nbsp;Paul E. Skelley ,&nbsp;Stacy M. Philpott","doi":"10.1016/j.baae.2025.10.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Agroecosystem management can have large impacts on arthropod communities, with downstream consequences for ecosystem function. In grazed agroecosystems, dung beetle nesting and consumption activities contribute to critical ecosystem services such as aerating soils, dispersing seeds, suppressing pathogens, decreasing fly eggs, decreasing dung greenhouse gas emissions, and increasing nutrients in the soil. Grassland grazing management as well as the landscape cover surrounding a grassland can impact dung beetle abundance and diversity with implications for downstream ecosystem function. One third of California is grazed by livestock, however, there are few studies of dung beetles in these agroecosystems. Our study examines the effect of grazing management, including the time spent grazing and animal density (the number of days grazed and number of animals), as well as how landscape cover, including surrounding grasslands, forests, and wetlands, affect dung beetle abundance and richness. We also examined how seasonality or temperature and the year in which we sampled affect dung beetle communities. We found that grazing management affects richness. While increases in the number of days grazed was associated with higher dung beetle species richness, we found that increased grazing density was associated with lower dung beetle species richness, showing that increasing grazing density may have a detrimental effect on richness. We also found that the amount of wetland cover in the landscape was positively associated with abundance and species richness, and grassland cover was positively associated with species richness. Dung beetle abundance did not shift by year, but did shift with sample time, while dung beetle richness shifted with year and sample time. Our results differed by beetle functional type and species. The results demonstrate the importance of both local disturbances and more permanent landscape surroundings for arthropod communities in agroecosystems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8708,"journal":{"name":"Basic and Applied Ecology","volume":"89 ","pages":"Pages 120-127"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Basic and Applied Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S143917912500091X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Agroecosystem management can have large impacts on arthropod communities, with downstream consequences for ecosystem function. In grazed agroecosystems, dung beetle nesting and consumption activities contribute to critical ecosystem services such as aerating soils, dispersing seeds, suppressing pathogens, decreasing fly eggs, decreasing dung greenhouse gas emissions, and increasing nutrients in the soil. Grassland grazing management as well as the landscape cover surrounding a grassland can impact dung beetle abundance and diversity with implications for downstream ecosystem function. One third of California is grazed by livestock, however, there are few studies of dung beetles in these agroecosystems. Our study examines the effect of grazing management, including the time spent grazing and animal density (the number of days grazed and number of animals), as well as how landscape cover, including surrounding grasslands, forests, and wetlands, affect dung beetle abundance and richness. We also examined how seasonality or temperature and the year in which we sampled affect dung beetle communities. We found that grazing management affects richness. While increases in the number of days grazed was associated with higher dung beetle species richness, we found that increased grazing density was associated with lower dung beetle species richness, showing that increasing grazing density may have a detrimental effect on richness. We also found that the amount of wetland cover in the landscape was positively associated with abundance and species richness, and grassland cover was positively associated with species richness. Dung beetle abundance did not shift by year, but did shift with sample time, while dung beetle richness shifted with year and sample time. Our results differed by beetle functional type and species. The results demonstrate the importance of both local disturbances and more permanent landscape surroundings for arthropod communities in agroecosystems.
景观和放牧管理影响着加利福尼亚的蜣螂群落
农业生态系统管理可对节肢动物群落产生重大影响,并对生态系统功能产生下游影响。在放牧的农业生态系统中,屎壳郎筑巢和消费活动有助于提供关键的生态系统服务,如给土壤通风、传播种子、抑制病原体、减少蝇卵、减少粪便温室气体排放和增加土壤养分。草地放牧管理和草地周围的景观覆盖会影响屎壳虫的丰度和多样性,并对下游生态系统功能产生影响。加州三分之一的土地被牲畜放牧,然而,在这些农业生态系统中很少有关于屎壳郎的研究。我们的研究考察了放牧管理的影响,包括放牧时间和动物密度(放牧天数和动物数量),以及景观覆盖(包括周围的草原、森林和湿地)如何影响屎壳郎的丰度和丰富度。我们还研究了季节、温度和采样年份对蜣螂群落的影响。我们发现放牧管理影响了丰富度。放牧天数的增加与屎壳郎物种丰富度的增加相关,而放牧密度的增加与屎壳郎物种丰富度的降低相关,表明放牧密度的增加可能对屎壳郎物种丰富度产生不利影响。湿地覆盖度与物种丰富度、物种丰富度呈正相关,草地覆盖度与物种丰富度呈正相关。屎壳郎丰度不随年份变化,但随采样时间变化,屎壳郎丰度随年份和采样时间变化。不同种类甲虫的功能类型不同,结果也不同。结果表明,局部干扰和更永久的景观环境对农业生态系统中节肢动物群落的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Basic and Applied Ecology
Basic and Applied Ecology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
103
审稿时长
10.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Basic and Applied Ecology provides a forum in which significant advances and ideas can be rapidly communicated to a wide audience. Basic and Applied Ecology publishes original contributions, perspectives and reviews from all areas of basic and applied ecology. Ecologists from all countries are invited to publish ecological research of international interest in its pages. There is no bias with regard to taxon or geographical area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书