Promotion vs. prevention? The impacts of national cultural values and regulatory focus on near-expiry food across Malaysia and China

IF 5.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Food Quality and Preference Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-02 DOI:10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105780
Bo Shu , Yanlin Mei , Songlin Yang
{"title":"Promotion vs. prevention? The impacts of national cultural values and regulatory focus on near-expiry food across Malaysia and China","authors":"Bo Shu ,&nbsp;Yanlin Mei ,&nbsp;Songlin Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105780","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In high food waste environments, purchasing near-expiry food (NEF) is both an ethical and practical decision. While existing studies have highlighted the role of individual attitudes and economic factors, limited attention has been given to the interplay between cultural moral systems and motivational orientations in shaping such behavior. This study develops and tests a culturally grounded framework that explains how national cultural values and regulatory focus jointly influence consumer intention to purchase NEF. Drawing on Confucian and Islamic ethical systems, three experiments (<em>N</em> = 1321) were conducted in China and Malaysia. Study 1 demonstrated that individuals influenced by Islamic cultural values presented significantly greater NEF purchase intentions than those influenced by Confucian values. Study 2 identified perceived ethical value as a mediator of this effect. Study 3 revealed a significant moderation by regulatory focus: Promotion-focused participants in the Confucian condition reported stronger purchase intentions, whereas prevention-focused participants in the Islamic condition maintained consistently high ethical engagement. Together, these findings highlight that ethical consumption is shaped not only by moral norms but also by motivational alignment. Practical implications are discussed for policy makers and marketers seeking to reduce food waste through culturally and motivationally congruent interventions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":"136 ","pages":"Article 105780"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329325003556","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In high food waste environments, purchasing near-expiry food (NEF) is both an ethical and practical decision. While existing studies have highlighted the role of individual attitudes and economic factors, limited attention has been given to the interplay between cultural moral systems and motivational orientations in shaping such behavior. This study develops and tests a culturally grounded framework that explains how national cultural values and regulatory focus jointly influence consumer intention to purchase NEF. Drawing on Confucian and Islamic ethical systems, three experiments (N = 1321) were conducted in China and Malaysia. Study 1 demonstrated that individuals influenced by Islamic cultural values presented significantly greater NEF purchase intentions than those influenced by Confucian values. Study 2 identified perceived ethical value as a mediator of this effect. Study 3 revealed a significant moderation by regulatory focus: Promotion-focused participants in the Confucian condition reported stronger purchase intentions, whereas prevention-focused participants in the Islamic condition maintained consistently high ethical engagement. Together, these findings highlight that ethical consumption is shaped not only by moral norms but also by motivational alignment. Practical implications are discussed for policy makers and marketers seeking to reduce food waste through culturally and motivationally congruent interventions.
促进还是预防?马来西亚和中国国家文化价值观的影响以及对临近过期食品的监管重点
在食物浪费严重的环境下,购买即将过期的食品(NEF)是一个合乎道德和现实的决定。虽然现有的研究强调了个人态度和经济因素的作用,但对文化道德体系和动机取向在形成这种行为方面的相互作用的关注有限。本研究发展并检验了一个文化基础框架,解释了国家文化价值观和监管焦点如何共同影响消费者购买新能源产品的意愿。借鉴儒家和伊斯兰伦理体系,在中国和马来西亚进行了三个实验(N = 1321)。研究1表明,受伊斯兰文化价值观影响的个体比受儒家文化价值观影响的个体表现出更大的新能源基金购买意愿。研究2确定了感知伦理价值是这种效应的中介。研究3揭示了监管焦点的显著缓和:在儒家条件下,以促销为重点的参与者报告了更强的购买意愿,而在伊斯兰条件下,以预防为重点的参与者始终保持较高的道德参与。总之,这些发现强调了道德消费不仅受到道德规范的影响,还受到动机一致性的影响。讨论了政策制定者和营销人员寻求通过文化和动机一致的干预措施减少食物浪费的实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Food Quality and Preference
Food Quality and Preference 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
15.10%
发文量
263
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书