Economic Evaluation of Community-Based Public Health Interventions: A Critical Review of Methodologies, Evidence, and Future Directions.

IF 17.2 1区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Therese Y M Tsui, Thunyarat Anothaisintawee, Kridsada Chareonrungrueangchai, Sharon Hui Xuan Tan, Yot Teerawattananon
{"title":"Economic Evaluation of Community-Based Public Health Interventions: A Critical Review of Methodologies, Evidence, and Future Directions.","authors":"Therese Y M Tsui, Thunyarat Anothaisintawee, Kridsada Chareonrungrueangchai, Sharon Hui Xuan Tan, Yot Teerawattananon","doi":"10.1146/annurev-publhealth-081424-040849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This critical review explores the current state of health economic evaluations of community-based public health interventions. Referencing 79 systematic reviews, it highlights the diversity of interventions, target populations, and evaluation methods while identifying promising cost-effectiveness evidence and significant methodological challenges. Key issues include inconsistent terminology, limited data from low- and middle-income countries, and variability in assessment approaches, which hinder comparability and policy application. The article emphasizes the need for standardized frameworks, tailored guidelines to inform evidence generation and decision-making, and stronger research capacity for conducting high-quality economic evaluations, particularly in resource-constrained settings. We highlight the importance of incorporating broader perspectives, such as spillover effects, and developing innovative modeling techniques to better capture community dynamics. Addressing these gaps will enhance the quality, rigor, and relevance of evaluations, supporting more sustainable investments in community health initiatives worldwide. Strengthening evaluation practices will ultimately improve resource allocation and health outcomes across populations and settings globally.</p>","PeriodicalId":50752,"journal":{"name":"Annual Review of Public Health","volume":" ","pages":"393-413"},"PeriodicalIF":17.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Review of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-081424-040849","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This critical review explores the current state of health economic evaluations of community-based public health interventions. Referencing 79 systematic reviews, it highlights the diversity of interventions, target populations, and evaluation methods while identifying promising cost-effectiveness evidence and significant methodological challenges. Key issues include inconsistent terminology, limited data from low- and middle-income countries, and variability in assessment approaches, which hinder comparability and policy application. The article emphasizes the need for standardized frameworks, tailored guidelines to inform evidence generation and decision-making, and stronger research capacity for conducting high-quality economic evaluations, particularly in resource-constrained settings. We highlight the importance of incorporating broader perspectives, such as spillover effects, and developing innovative modeling techniques to better capture community dynamics. Addressing these gaps will enhance the quality, rigor, and relevance of evaluations, supporting more sustainable investments in community health initiatives worldwide. Strengthening evaluation practices will ultimately improve resource allocation and health outcomes across populations and settings globally.

以社区为基础的公共卫生干预措施的经济评价:对方法、证据和未来方向的批判性回顾。
这篇批判性的综述探讨了基于社区的公共卫生干预措施的卫生经济评估的现状。它参考了79项系统综述,强调了干预措施、目标人群和评估方法的多样性,同时确定了有希望的成本效益证据和重大的方法挑战。关键问题包括不一致的术语,来自低收入和中等收入国家的有限数据,以及评估方法的可变性,这些都阻碍了可比性和政策的适用。这篇文章强调需要标准化框架、为证据生成和决策提供信息的量身定制的指南,以及加强开展高质量经济评估的研究能力,特别是在资源受限的情况下。我们强调了纳入更广泛视角(如溢出效应)和开发创新建模技术以更好地捕捉社区动态的重要性。解决这些差距将提高评价的质量、严谨性和相关性,支持对世界各地的社区卫生倡议进行更可持续的投资。加强评价做法将最终改善全球不同人群和环境的资源分配和健康结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annual Review of Public Health
Annual Review of Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
26.60
自引率
1.40%
发文量
36
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Annual Review of Public Health has been a trusted publication in the field since its inception in 1980. It provides comprehensive coverage of important advancements in various areas of public health, such as epidemiology, biostatistics, environmental health, occupational health, social environment and behavior, health services, as well as public health practice and policy. In an effort to make the valuable research and information more accessible, the current volume has undergone a transformation. Previously, access to the articles was restricted, but now they are available to everyone through the Annual Reviews' Subscribe to Open program. This open access approach ensures that the knowledge and insights shared in these articles can reach a wider audience. Additionally, all the published articles are licensed under a CC BY license, allowing users to freely use, distribute, and build upon the content, while giving appropriate credit to the original authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书