A legal quagmire: the need for a public health approach to the competency crisis.

IF 2.8 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Erin McCauley, Zaire Cullins, Katherine LeMasters
{"title":"A legal quagmire: the need for a public health approach to the competency crisis.","authors":"Erin McCauley, Zaire Cullins, Katherine LeMasters","doi":"10.1186/s40352-025-00379-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Competency to stand trial is a legal construct in the United States whereby an individual's capacity to meaningfully and knowingly function in a legal proceeding, typically for those with mental or developmental disabilities or dementia, is questioned. The competency determination and restoration process often leads to unnecessary and excessive incarceration of those with disabilities without treatment for the underlying cause of competency concerns, often worsening health and leading to repeated incarceration. Yet, this crisis is rarely considered from a public health lens. Further, the number of individuals entangled in this legal process has risen dramatically in recent years, with 130,000 competency evaluations being conducted annually. We review what is known about this topic from legal studies, provide case studies of individuals failed by this process, and outline the responses that criminal legal systems and local and state governments have had to this crisis (e.g., increase in jails' competency beds, diversion programs). We conclude that the competency process is a public health crisis which merits both study by public health researchers and a public health response.</p>","PeriodicalId":37843,"journal":{"name":"Health and Justice","volume":"13 1","pages":"65"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12595709/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health and Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40352-025-00379-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Competency to stand trial is a legal construct in the United States whereby an individual's capacity to meaningfully and knowingly function in a legal proceeding, typically for those with mental or developmental disabilities or dementia, is questioned. The competency determination and restoration process often leads to unnecessary and excessive incarceration of those with disabilities without treatment for the underlying cause of competency concerns, often worsening health and leading to repeated incarceration. Yet, this crisis is rarely considered from a public health lens. Further, the number of individuals entangled in this legal process has risen dramatically in recent years, with 130,000 competency evaluations being conducted annually. We review what is known about this topic from legal studies, provide case studies of individuals failed by this process, and outline the responses that criminal legal systems and local and state governments have had to this crisis (e.g., increase in jails' competency beds, diversion programs). We conclude that the competency process is a public health crisis which merits both study by public health researchers and a public health response.

法律困境:需要一种公共卫生方法来应对能力危机。
受审能力在美国是一种法律概念,即个人在法律程序中有意义地、有意识地发挥作用的能力受到质疑,尤其是对那些患有精神或发育障碍或痴呆症的人。能力确定和恢复过程往往导致对残疾人进行不必要和过度的监禁,而没有针对能力问题的根本原因进行治疗,往往导致健康恶化并导致反复监禁。然而,很少有人从公共卫生的角度来考虑这场危机。此外,近年来,卷入这一法律程序的个人数量急剧增加,每年进行13万次能力评估。我们回顾了法律研究中关于这一主题的已知内容,提供了在这一过程中失败的个人的案例研究,并概述了刑事法律系统以及地方和州政府对这一危机的反应(例如,增加监狱的能力床位,转移项目)。我们得出结论,胜任力过程是一场公共卫生危机,既值得公共卫生研究人员研究,也值得公共卫生应对。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health and Justice
Health and Justice Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
8.60%
发文量
34
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Health & Justice is open to submissions from public health, criminology and criminal justice, medical science, psychology and clinical sciences, sociology, neuroscience, biology, anthropology and the social sciences, and covers a broad array of research types. It publishes original research, research notes (promising issues that are smaller in scope), commentaries, and translational notes (possible ways of introducing innovations in the justice system). Health & Justice aims to: Present original experimental research on the area of health and well-being of people involved in the adult or juvenile justice system, including people who work in the system; Present meta-analysis or systematic reviews in the area of health and justice for those involved in the justice system; Provide an arena to present new and upcoming scientific issues; Present translational science—the movement of scientific findings into practice including programs, procedures, or strategies; Present implementation science findings to advance the uptake and use of evidence-based practices; and, Present protocols and clinical practice guidelines. As an open access journal, Health & Justice aims for a broad reach, including researchers across many disciplines as well as justice practitioners (e.g. judges, prosecutors, defenders, probation officers, treatment providers, mental health and medical personnel working with justice-involved individuals, etc.). The sections of the journal devoted to translational and implementation sciences are primarily geared to practitioners and justice actors with special attention to the techniques used.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书