Impact of respiratory muscle training on muscle strength, pulmonary function, symptoms, and quality of life in COPD.

IF 1.8 0 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy Pub Date : 2025-11-03 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.29390/001c.146372
Chris Russian, Sharon Armstead, Elizabeth Rosenthal, Michael Shapiro
{"title":"Impact of respiratory muscle training on muscle strength, pulmonary function, symptoms, and quality of life in COPD.","authors":"Chris Russian, Sharon Armstead, Elizabeth Rosenthal, Michael Shapiro","doi":"10.29390/001c.146372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterized by respiratory muscle weakness, hyperinflation, and systemic inflammation, leading to impaired pulmonary function and quality of life. Respiratory muscle training (RMT) may strengthen the inspiratory and expiratory muscles, improve pulmonary function, reduce dyspnea, and enhance functional outcomes. This study assessed the impact of concurrent RMT on respiratory muscle strength, spirometry, dyspnea, and quality of life in patients with COPD.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This was a single-cohort pre/post-intervention study initially recruiting 43 patients with COPD to participate in an 8-week RMT program using a threshold pressure device. Both inspiratory and expiratory training were performed using a PowerLung device with adjustable resistance. Training consisted of three sets of ten breaths twice daily for each mode, and participants were instructed to increase resistance incrementally when the load became easy. Assessments included spirometry, maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP), maximum expiratory pressure (MEP), COPD Assessment Test (CAT), Medical Research Council (MRC) Breathlessness Scale, and Airways Questionnaire 20 (AQ20). Data were collected at baseline and post-intervention and analyzed using paired <i>t</i>-tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, stratified by GOLD category.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-seven participants completed the study. Statistically significant improvements were observed in MIP (mean increase 14.1 cm H₂O, <i>p</i> < .001), MEP (mean increase 20.1 cm H₂O, <i>p</i> < .001), CAT (mean decrease 2.92, <i>p</i> = .020), and AQ20 (mean decrease 1.67, <i>p</i> = .005). FEV₁ improved modestly but did not reach statistical significance (mean increase 0.0367 L, <i>p</i> = .064). The GOLD distribution included eight participants in GOLD 2, 12 in GOLD 3, and seven in GOLD 4. Improvements in MIP and MEP were statistically significant within all GOLD categories. A clinically meaningful increase in FEV₁ (≥ 60 mL) was observed in participants in GOLD 3 and 4 stages, though not statistically significant. Correlations between muscle strength improvements and symptom scores were moderate to strong.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Concurrent RMT improves respiratory muscle strength and quality of life in patients with COPD, with the greatest benefits observed in advanced disease stages. Enhanced respiratory muscle efficiency may reduce dyspnea and promote exercise tolerance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RMT is a promising intervention for COPD management that offers improved respiratory muscle strength and quality of life. Future studies should explore the long-term effects and optimize protocols for broader implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":39373,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy","volume":"61 ","pages":"262-271"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12588354/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29390/001c.146372","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterized by respiratory muscle weakness, hyperinflation, and systemic inflammation, leading to impaired pulmonary function and quality of life. Respiratory muscle training (RMT) may strengthen the inspiratory and expiratory muscles, improve pulmonary function, reduce dyspnea, and enhance functional outcomes. This study assessed the impact of concurrent RMT on respiratory muscle strength, spirometry, dyspnea, and quality of life in patients with COPD.

Materials and methods: This was a single-cohort pre/post-intervention study initially recruiting 43 patients with COPD to participate in an 8-week RMT program using a threshold pressure device. Both inspiratory and expiratory training were performed using a PowerLung device with adjustable resistance. Training consisted of three sets of ten breaths twice daily for each mode, and participants were instructed to increase resistance incrementally when the load became easy. Assessments included spirometry, maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP), maximum expiratory pressure (MEP), COPD Assessment Test (CAT), Medical Research Council (MRC) Breathlessness Scale, and Airways Questionnaire 20 (AQ20). Data were collected at baseline and post-intervention and analyzed using paired t-tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, stratified by GOLD category.

Results: Twenty-seven participants completed the study. Statistically significant improvements were observed in MIP (mean increase 14.1 cm H₂O, p < .001), MEP (mean increase 20.1 cm H₂O, p < .001), CAT (mean decrease 2.92, p = .020), and AQ20 (mean decrease 1.67, p = .005). FEV₁ improved modestly but did not reach statistical significance (mean increase 0.0367 L, p = .064). The GOLD distribution included eight participants in GOLD 2, 12 in GOLD 3, and seven in GOLD 4. Improvements in MIP and MEP were statistically significant within all GOLD categories. A clinically meaningful increase in FEV₁ (≥ 60 mL) was observed in participants in GOLD 3 and 4 stages, though not statistically significant. Correlations between muscle strength improvements and symptom scores were moderate to strong.

Discussion: Concurrent RMT improves respiratory muscle strength and quality of life in patients with COPD, with the greatest benefits observed in advanced disease stages. Enhanced respiratory muscle efficiency may reduce dyspnea and promote exercise tolerance.

Conclusion: RMT is a promising intervention for COPD management that offers improved respiratory muscle strength and quality of life. Future studies should explore the long-term effects and optimize protocols for broader implementation.

呼吸肌肉训练对COPD患者肌肉力量、肺功能、症状和生活质量的影响
慢性阻塞性肺疾病(Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, COPD)以呼吸肌肉无力、过度充气和全身性炎症为特征,导致肺功能和生活质量受损。呼吸肌训练(RMT)可以加强吸气和呼气肌,改善肺功能,减少呼吸困难,并提高功能预后。本研究评估了同步RMT对COPD患者呼吸肌力量、肺活量测定、呼吸困难和生活质量的影响。材料和方法:这是一项单队列干预前/干预后研究,最初招募43名COPD患者参加为期8周的使用阈值压力装置的RMT计划。吸气和呼气训练均使用阻力可调的PowerLung装置进行。训练包括三组,每组10次呼吸,每天两次,当负荷变得容易时,参与者被指示逐渐增加阻力。评估包括肺活量测定、最大吸气压力(MIP)、最大呼气压力(MEP)、COPD评估测试(CAT)、医学研究委员会(MRC)呼吸困难量表和气道问卷20 (AQ20)。在基线和干预后收集数据,并使用配对t检验和Wilcoxon符号秩检验进行分析,按GOLD类别分层。结果:27名参与者完成了研究。MIP(平均增加14.1 cm H₂O, p < .001)、MEP(平均增加20.1 cm H₂O, p < .001)、CAT(平均减少2.92,p = .020)、AQ20(平均减少1.67,p = .005)均有统计学意义的改善。FEV₁略有改善,但未达到统计学意义(平均增加0.0367 L, p = 0.064)。GOLD分布包括GOLD 2组8人,GOLD 3组12人,GOLD 4组7人。在所有GOLD类别中,MIP和MEP的改善具有统计学意义。在GOLD 3和4期的参与者中观察到FEV 1(≥60 mL)有临床意义的增加,尽管没有统计学意义。肌肉力量改善与症状评分之间的相关性为中强。讨论:同步RMT可改善COPD患者的呼吸肌力量和生活质量,在疾病晚期观察到最大的益处。增强呼吸肌效率可减少呼吸困难,提高运动耐受性。结论:RMT是一种有希望的COPD治疗干预措施,可改善呼吸肌力量和生活质量。未来的研究应探索长期效果,并优化方案,以便更广泛地实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy
Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy Health Professions-Health Professions (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: The CJRT is published four times a year and represents the interests of respiratory therapists nationally and internationally. The CJRT has been redesigned to act as an educational dissemination tool. The CJRT encourages submission of original articles, papers, commentaries, case studies, literature reviews and directed reading papers. Submissions can be sent to Rita Hansen.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书