{"title":"The Tube Test fails to predict social dominance in across two strains of mice","authors":"T.L. Philbeck, R. Parrish Waters","doi":"10.1016/j.physbeh.2025.115157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Mice form social hierarchies that can determine access to limited resources and overall health. Accordingly, social rank strongly influences behavioral and physiological health. The Tube Test is an established method used to identify social rank in mice and its rapidity and simplicity have made it a popular tool to understand mouse social relationships; however, this test is not universally accepted as a reliable and objective measure of social dominance. To address its controversial validity, we compared performance in the Tube Test to home cage aggression, home cage activity, preputial gland size, and steroid hormone levels, all of which are indicators of dominance or social stress in mice, but are less utilized because of the high expense and intense labor involved. We used young adult male mice housed in dyads, and evaluated these measures over 29 days. To broaden the impact of this study, we used dyads of both outbred CD-1 and inbred C57 mice. Tube Test performance had no ability to predict qualities associated with behavioral or physiological dominance, suggesting that caution should be taken when using the Tube Test to predict dominance relationships in mice. Our study does, however, suggest that the Tube Test may offer some utility in alternative contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20201,"journal":{"name":"Physiology & Behavior","volume":"304 ","pages":"Article 115157"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiology & Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031938425003580","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Mice form social hierarchies that can determine access to limited resources and overall health. Accordingly, social rank strongly influences behavioral and physiological health. The Tube Test is an established method used to identify social rank in mice and its rapidity and simplicity have made it a popular tool to understand mouse social relationships; however, this test is not universally accepted as a reliable and objective measure of social dominance. To address its controversial validity, we compared performance in the Tube Test to home cage aggression, home cage activity, preputial gland size, and steroid hormone levels, all of which are indicators of dominance or social stress in mice, but are less utilized because of the high expense and intense labor involved. We used young adult male mice housed in dyads, and evaluated these measures over 29 days. To broaden the impact of this study, we used dyads of both outbred CD-1 and inbred C57 mice. Tube Test performance had no ability to predict qualities associated with behavioral or physiological dominance, suggesting that caution should be taken when using the Tube Test to predict dominance relationships in mice. Our study does, however, suggest that the Tube Test may offer some utility in alternative contexts.
期刊介绍:
Physiology & Behavior is aimed at the causal physiological mechanisms of behavior and its modulation by environmental factors. The journal invites original reports in the broad area of behavioral and cognitive neuroscience, in which at least one variable is physiological and the primary emphasis and theoretical context are behavioral. The range of subjects includes behavioral neuroendocrinology, psychoneuroimmunology, learning and memory, ingestion, social behavior, and studies related to the mechanisms of psychopathology. Contemporary reviews and theoretical articles are welcomed and the Editors invite such proposals from interested authors.