The Tube Test fails to predict social dominance in across two strains of mice

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Physiology & Behavior Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-04 DOI:10.1016/j.physbeh.2025.115157
T.L. Philbeck, R. Parrish Waters
{"title":"The Tube Test fails to predict social dominance in across two strains of mice","authors":"T.L. Philbeck,&nbsp;R. Parrish Waters","doi":"10.1016/j.physbeh.2025.115157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Mice form social hierarchies that can determine access to limited resources and overall health. Accordingly, social rank strongly influences behavioral and physiological health. The Tube Test is an established method used to identify social rank in mice and its rapidity and simplicity have made it a popular tool to understand mouse social relationships; however, this test is not universally accepted as a reliable and objective measure of social dominance. To address its controversial validity, we compared performance in the Tube Test to home cage aggression, home cage activity, preputial gland size, and steroid hormone levels, all of which are indicators of dominance or social stress in mice, but are less utilized because of the high expense and intense labor involved. We used young adult male mice housed in dyads, and evaluated these measures over 29 days. To broaden the impact of this study, we used dyads of both outbred CD-1 and inbred C57 mice. Tube Test performance had no ability to predict qualities associated with behavioral or physiological dominance, suggesting that caution should be taken when using the Tube Test to predict dominance relationships in mice. Our study does, however, suggest that the Tube Test may offer some utility in alternative contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20201,"journal":{"name":"Physiology & Behavior","volume":"304 ","pages":"Article 115157"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiology & Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031938425003580","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mice form social hierarchies that can determine access to limited resources and overall health. Accordingly, social rank strongly influences behavioral and physiological health. The Tube Test is an established method used to identify social rank in mice and its rapidity and simplicity have made it a popular tool to understand mouse social relationships; however, this test is not universally accepted as a reliable and objective measure of social dominance. To address its controversial validity, we compared performance in the Tube Test to home cage aggression, home cage activity, preputial gland size, and steroid hormone levels, all of which are indicators of dominance or social stress in mice, but are less utilized because of the high expense and intense labor involved. We used young adult male mice housed in dyads, and evaluated these measures over 29 days. To broaden the impact of this study, we used dyads of both outbred CD-1 and inbred C57 mice. Tube Test performance had no ability to predict qualities associated with behavioral or physiological dominance, suggesting that caution should be taken when using the Tube Test to predict dominance relationships in mice. Our study does, however, suggest that the Tube Test may offer some utility in alternative contexts.
试管试验无法预测多种品系小鼠的社会支配地位。
老鼠形成的社会等级制度可以决定对有限资源和整体健康的访问。因此,社会等级强烈影响行为和生理健康。试管测试是一种用于识别小鼠社会等级的既定方法,它的快速和简单使它成为了解小鼠社会关系的流行工具;然而,这个测试并没有被普遍认为是衡量社会支配地位的可靠和客观的方法。为了解决其有争议的有效性,我们将试管测试中的表现与家笼攻击、家笼活动、包皮腺大小和类固醇激素水平进行了比较,这些指标都是小鼠的优势或社会压力指标,但由于成本高、劳动强度大,这些指标很少被利用。我们将年轻的成年雄性小鼠安置在二组中,并在29天内评估这些措施。为了扩大这项研究的影响,我们使用了近交系CD-1和近交系C57小鼠的二联体。试管测试的表现不能预测与行为或生理优势相关的品质,这表明在使用试管测试预测小鼠的优势关系时应该谨慎。然而,我们的研究确实表明,试管测试可能在其他情况下提供一些效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physiology & Behavior
Physiology & Behavior 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
3.40%
发文量
274
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Physiology & Behavior is aimed at the causal physiological mechanisms of behavior and its modulation by environmental factors. The journal invites original reports in the broad area of behavioral and cognitive neuroscience, in which at least one variable is physiological and the primary emphasis and theoretical context are behavioral. The range of subjects includes behavioral neuroendocrinology, psychoneuroimmunology, learning and memory, ingestion, social behavior, and studies related to the mechanisms of psychopathology. Contemporary reviews and theoretical articles are welcomed and the Editors invite such proposals from interested authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书