Fifty Years of Lithium in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder and Related Disorders: A Systematic Review of Clinical Evidence Challenging a Theoretical Assumption.

IF 3.7 4区 心理学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Neuropsychobiology Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-06 DOI:10.1159/000548947
Murilo Branco, Verônica Hühne, Ligia M Fonseca, Inês M Salles-Fonseca, Maria E Moreira-de-Oliveira, Gabriela B de Menezes, Leonardo F Fontenelle
{"title":"Fifty Years of Lithium in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder and Related Disorders: A Systematic Review of Clinical Evidence Challenging a Theoretical Assumption.","authors":"Murilo Branco, Verônica Hühne, Ligia M Fonseca, Inês M Salles-Fonseca, Maria E Moreira-de-Oliveira, Gabriela B de Menezes, Leonardo F Fontenelle","doi":"10.1159/000548947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and related disorders (OCRDs) represent a group of conditions in which lack of response to first-line treatments, such as serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRIs), is common. Therefore, exploring alternative strategies is necessary. We conducted a systematic review of the use of lithium in OCRDs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. We included studies evaluating the use of lithium for OCRDs in adults. Eligible designs included case reports, case series, observational studies, and clinical trials. Four databases (PubMed, PsycInfo, Web of Science, and <ext-link ext-link-type=\"uri\" xlink:href=\"http://ClinicalTrials.gov\" xmlns:xlink=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\">ClinicalTrials.gov</ext-link>) were searched on January 21, 2025. Response to lithium was defined by improvement on validated scales or, when unavailable, based on clinical descriptions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-nine studies met inclusion criteria, including 25 case reports or case series and four clinical trials. Most studies focused on OCD (n = 20), followed by trichotillomania (n = 5), tic disorders (n = 3), and body dysmorphic disorder (n = 1). Across the full sample (n = 97), 38.1% of the subjects showed \"clinical improvement,\" although only 54.6% were assessed using validated instruments. Among case reports and case series (n = 37), 89.2% reported \"improvement.\" However, three crossover RCTs found no consistent benefit of lithium, and the only placebo-controlled trial did not detect significant differences between groups in the final pooled analysis. Analysis of individual data showed response to lithium to be more common among younger individuals (p = 0.02), those with comorbid bipolar disorder (p = 0.005), individuals receiving lithium as monotherapy (p < 0.018), and those without prior exposure to SRIs (p < 0.001). Additionally, responders were less likely to have been assessed using standardized instruments (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is the first systematic review to evaluate lithium as a treatment strategy for OCRDs. While some reports suggest potential benefits, current evidence - largely based on low-quality studies without standardized assessments - does not support its use. Findings from randomized trials remain inconclusive, and further high-quality research is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":19239,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychobiology","volume":" ","pages":"59-72"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychobiology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000548947","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and related disorders (OCRDs) represent a group of conditions in which lack of response to first-line treatments, such as serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRIs), is common. Therefore, exploring alternative strategies is necessary. We conducted a systematic review of the use of lithium in OCRDs.

Methods: This systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. We included studies evaluating the use of lithium for OCRDs in adults. Eligible designs included case reports, case series, observational studies, and clinical trials. Four databases (PubMed, PsycInfo, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov) were searched on January 21, 2025. Response to lithium was defined by improvement on validated scales or, when unavailable, based on clinical descriptions.

Results: Twenty-nine studies met inclusion criteria, including 25 case reports or case series and four clinical trials. Most studies focused on OCD (n = 20), followed by trichotillomania (n = 5), tic disorders (n = 3), and body dysmorphic disorder (n = 1). Across the full sample (n = 97), 38.1% of the subjects showed "clinical improvement," although only 54.6% were assessed using validated instruments. Among case reports and case series (n = 37), 89.2% reported "improvement." However, three crossover RCTs found no consistent benefit of lithium, and the only placebo-controlled trial did not detect significant differences between groups in the final pooled analysis. Analysis of individual data showed response to lithium to be more common among younger individuals (p = 0.02), those with comorbid bipolar disorder (p = 0.005), individuals receiving lithium as monotherapy (p < 0.018), and those without prior exposure to SRIs (p < 0.001). Additionally, responders were less likely to have been assessed using standardized instruments (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: This is the first systematic review to evaluate lithium as a treatment strategy for OCRDs. While some reports suggest potential benefits, current evidence - largely based on low-quality studies without standardized assessments - does not support its use. Findings from randomized trials remain inconclusive, and further high-quality research is needed.

锂治疗强迫症及相关疾病的50年研究:对挑战理论假设的临床证据的系统回顾。
简介:强迫症(OCD)及相关疾病(ocrd)是一类对一线治疗缺乏反应的疾病,如血清素再摄取抑制剂(SRIs)。因此,探索替代策略是必要的。我们对锂在ocrd中的应用进行了系统回顾。方法:本系统评价按照PRISMA指南进行。我们纳入了评估锂治疗成人慢性阻塞性肺病的研究。符合条件的设计包括病例报告、病例系列、观察性研究和临床试验。四个数据库(PubMed, PsycInfo, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov)在2025年1月21日被检索。对锂的反应是通过有效量表的改善来定义的,如果没有,则根据临床描述来定义。结果:29项研究符合纳入标准,包括25例病例报告或病例系列和4项临床试验。大多数研究集中在强迫症(OCD, n = 20),其次是拔毛癖(TTM, n = 5),抽动障碍(n = 3)和身体畸形障碍(BDD, n = 1)。在整个样本(n = 97)中,38.1%的受试者表现出“临床改善”,尽管只有54.6%的受试者使用经过验证的仪器进行了评估。在病例报告和病例系列(n = 37)中,89.2%报告“改善”。然而,三个交叉随机对照试验没有发现锂的一致益处,唯一的安慰剂对照试验在最终的汇总分析中没有发现组间的显著差异。个体数据分析显示,对锂的反应在年轻人(p = 0.02)、双相共病患者(p = 0.005)、接受锂单药治疗的个体(p < 0.018)和之前未接触过SRIs的个体(p < 0.001)中更为常见。此外,应答者较少使用标准化仪器进行评估(p < 0.001)。结论:这是第一个评价锂作为治疗ocld策略的系统综述。虽然一些报告提出了潜在的好处,但目前的证据——主要是基于没有标准化评估的低质量研究——并不支持使用它。随机试验的结果仍然不确定,需要进一步的高质量研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuropsychobiology
Neuropsychobiology 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The biological approach to mental disorders continues to yield innovative findings of clinical importance, particularly if methodologies are combined. This journal collects high quality empirical studies from various experimental and clinical approaches in the fields of Biological Psychiatry, Biological Psychology and Neuropsychology. It features original, clinical and basic research in the fields of neurophysiology and functional imaging, neuropharmacology and neurochemistry, neuroendocrinology and neuroimmunology, genetics and their relationships with normal psychology and psychopathology. In addition, the reader will find studies on animal models of mental disorders and therapeutic interventions, and pharmacoelectroencephalographic studies. Regular reviews report new methodologic approaches, and selected case reports provide hints for future research. ''Neuropsychobiology'' is a complete record of strategies and methodologies employed to study the biological basis of mental functions including their interactions with psychological and social factors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书