{"title":"Complication Burden and Demographic Trends in Autologous Breast Reconstruction Outcomes: Insights from the NIH All of Us Program.","authors":"Hiren N Parekh, Salih Colakoglu, Sashank K Reddy","doi":"10.1055/a-2737-6539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While the risks and benefits of autologous breast reconstruction have been widely examined, nationally representative, longitudinal data on complication burden, flap utilization trends, and patient-level risk factors remain limited. The NIH All of Us Research Program provides an opportunity to address these gaps using a diverse, population-scale cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified 260 patients who underwent autologous breast reconstruction using current procedural terminology codes within the All of Us Registered Tier Dataset (1995-2025). Complications were tracked at 30 days and 1 year postoperatively. Logistic, multivariate regressions, and Kaplan-Meier analyses evaluated predictors and timing of complications. Unsupervised machine learning via k-means clustering was utilized to uncover phenotypic subgroups by age and body mass index (BMI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Deep inferior epigastric perforator flap utilization increased over time, particularly among younger patients. Complication rates did not significantly differ across flap types. BMI > 32.7 kg/m<sup>2</sup> was associated with increased 30-day complications, while age and race were not independent predictors. Chronic pain and persistent postoperative pain were the most common 1-year complications. Flap failure occurred in fewer than 2% of cases. Clustering revealed three patient subgroups with distinct complication profiles; older patients and those with higher BMI experienced greater morbidity but maintained high flap success rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Autologous breast reconstruction is broadly effective across diverse patient populations. Complication risk is more strongly influenced by BMI than by age or race. Chronic pain emerged as a common long-term morbidity, underscoring the need for improved detection and management efforts. The diversity, depth, and follow-up available through All of Us enable nuanced insights into reconstructive outcomes not possible with traditional datasets.</p>","PeriodicalId":16949,"journal":{"name":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","volume":" ","pages":"831-842"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2737-6539","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: While the risks and benefits of autologous breast reconstruction have been widely examined, nationally representative, longitudinal data on complication burden, flap utilization trends, and patient-level risk factors remain limited. The NIH All of Us Research Program provides an opportunity to address these gaps using a diverse, population-scale cohort.
Methods: We identified 260 patients who underwent autologous breast reconstruction using current procedural terminology codes within the All of Us Registered Tier Dataset (1995-2025). Complications were tracked at 30 days and 1 year postoperatively. Logistic, multivariate regressions, and Kaplan-Meier analyses evaluated predictors and timing of complications. Unsupervised machine learning via k-means clustering was utilized to uncover phenotypic subgroups by age and body mass index (BMI).
Results: Deep inferior epigastric perforator flap utilization increased over time, particularly among younger patients. Complication rates did not significantly differ across flap types. BMI > 32.7 kg/m2 was associated with increased 30-day complications, while age and race were not independent predictors. Chronic pain and persistent postoperative pain were the most common 1-year complications. Flap failure occurred in fewer than 2% of cases. Clustering revealed three patient subgroups with distinct complication profiles; older patients and those with higher BMI experienced greater morbidity but maintained high flap success rates.
Conclusion: Autologous breast reconstruction is broadly effective across diverse patient populations. Complication risk is more strongly influenced by BMI than by age or race. Chronic pain emerged as a common long-term morbidity, underscoring the need for improved detection and management efforts. The diversity, depth, and follow-up available through All of Us enable nuanced insights into reconstructive outcomes not possible with traditional datasets.
背景:虽然自体乳房重建的风险和益处已被广泛研究,但具有全国代表性的并发症负担、皮瓣使用趋势和患者层面危险因素的纵向数据仍然有限。美国国立卫生研究院“我们所有人”研究项目提供了一个机会,通过一个多样化的、人口规模的队列来解决这些差距。方法:我们在All of Us Registered Tier Dataset(1995-2025)中确定了260例使用CPT代码进行自体乳房重建的患者。分别于术后30天和1年随访并发症。Logistic、多元回归和Kaplan-Meier分析评估了并发症的预测因素和时间。通过K-means聚类的无监督机器学习被用来揭示年龄和BMI的表型亚组。结果:DIEP皮瓣的使用率随着时间的推移而增加,特别是在年轻患者中。不同皮瓣类型的并发症发生率无显著差异。体重指数>32.7 kg/m²与30天并发症增加有关,而年龄和种族不是独立的预测因素。慢性疼痛和术后持续疼痛是最常见的1年并发症。皮瓣失败的发生率不到2%。聚类显示三个亚组患者具有不同的并发症概况;老年患者和BMI较高的患者发病率较高,但皮瓣成功率较高。结论:自体乳房重建在不同的患者群体中广泛有效。与年龄或种族相比,BMI对并发症风险的影响更大。慢性疼痛作为一种常见的长期疾病出现,强调了改进检测和管理工作的必要性。通过All of Us提供的多样性、深度和后续跟踪,可以对传统数据集无法实现的重建结果进行细致入微的洞察。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery is a peer-reviewed, indexed journal that provides an international forum for the publication of articles focusing on reconstructive microsurgery and complex reconstructive surgery. The journal was originally established in 1984 for the microsurgical community to publish and share academic papers.
The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery provides the latest in original research spanning basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations. Review papers cover current topics in complex reconstruction and microsurgery. In addition, special sections discuss new technologies, innovations, materials, and significant problem cases.
The journal welcomes controversial topics, editorial comments, book reviews, and letters to the Editor, in order to complete the balanced spectrum of information available in the Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery. All articles undergo stringent peer review by international experts in the specialty.