Long-term outcomes of combination systemic and intravitreal antiviral therapy in the management of acute retinal necrosis.

IF 2 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Amanda Rb Wade, Zachary A Kroeger, Sidharth K Sengupta, Megan Guerre, Ambar Faridi, Steven Yeh, Christina J Flaxel
{"title":"Long-term outcomes of combination systemic and intravitreal antiviral therapy in the management of acute retinal necrosis.","authors":"Amanda Rb Wade, Zachary A Kroeger, Sidharth K Sengupta, Megan Guerre, Ambar Faridi, Steven Yeh, Christina J Flaxel","doi":"10.1186/s12348-025-00535-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>To investigate whether patients diagnosed with acute retinal necrosis (ARN) previously treated with combination systemic and intravitreal antiviral injection have better long-term outcomes than those treated with systemic antiviral monotherapy PATIENTS AND METHODS: Follow-up retrospective cohort study analyzing data collected since 2009.<sup>1</sup> Patient medical charts were reviewed for ophthalmologic data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the original 24 patients, eight patients (nine eyes) had sufficient data for analysis. Six eyes had previously received combination systemic and intravitreal antiviral therapy, and three eyes were treated with systemic monotherapy (P = 0.39). Average follow-up was 177 months. Within each group, no significant difference was detected between initial and final logMAR VA (i.e. combination therapy: P = 0.78; systemic monotherapy: P = 0.60). There was no significant difference in the development of phthisis or enucleation between treatment groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this long-term cohort of ARN patients, two-thirds of patients in the original study were lost to follow-up leading to reduced sample size, however the loss was equal between the two groups. Given our limited sample size available for follow-up, there is no definitive recommendation for changing the current paradigm of treatment for this disease. Our data suggests that long-term follow-up is required for patients with ARN following their initial treatment. We recommend further studies to provide definitive recommendations in this complex patient group.</p>","PeriodicalId":16600,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ophthalmic Inflammation and Infection","volume":"15 1","pages":"81"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12595154/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ophthalmic Inflammation and Infection","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12348-025-00535-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: To investigate whether patients diagnosed with acute retinal necrosis (ARN) previously treated with combination systemic and intravitreal antiviral injection have better long-term outcomes than those treated with systemic antiviral monotherapy PATIENTS AND METHODS: Follow-up retrospective cohort study analyzing data collected since 2009.1 Patient medical charts were reviewed for ophthalmologic data.

Results: Of the original 24 patients, eight patients (nine eyes) had sufficient data for analysis. Six eyes had previously received combination systemic and intravitreal antiviral therapy, and three eyes were treated with systemic monotherapy (P = 0.39). Average follow-up was 177 months. Within each group, no significant difference was detected between initial and final logMAR VA (i.e. combination therapy: P = 0.78; systemic monotherapy: P = 0.60). There was no significant difference in the development of phthisis or enucleation between treatment groups.

Conclusion: In this long-term cohort of ARN patients, two-thirds of patients in the original study were lost to follow-up leading to reduced sample size, however the loss was equal between the two groups. Given our limited sample size available for follow-up, there is no definitive recommendation for changing the current paradigm of treatment for this disease. Our data suggests that long-term follow-up is required for patients with ARN following their initial treatment. We recommend further studies to provide definitive recommendations in this complex patient group.

全身和玻璃体内联合抗病毒治疗急性视网膜坏死的长期疗效。
背景与目的:探讨急性视网膜坏死(ARN)患者既往接受全身和玻璃体内联合抗病毒药物注射治疗是否比接受全身抗病毒药物单一治疗的患者有更好的长期预后。患者和方法:随访回顾性队列研究,分析自2009年以来收集的数据。结果:24例患者中,8例(9只眼)有足够的数据进行分析。既往有6只眼接受全身和玻璃体内联合抗病毒治疗,3只眼接受全身单药治疗(P = 0.39)。平均随访177个月。在每组中,初始和最终的logMAR VA无显著差异(即联合治疗:P = 0.78;全身单药治疗:P = 0.60)。治疗组间肺结核和去核的发生无显著差异。结论:在这个ARN患者的长期队列中,原研究中三分之二的患者失去了随访,导致样本量减少,但两组之间的损失相等。鉴于我们可用于随访的样本量有限,没有明确的建议改变目前治疗这种疾病的范例。我们的数据表明,ARN患者在初始治疗后需要长期随访。我们建议进一步研究,为这一复杂的患者群体提供明确的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
3.40%
发文量
39
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书