Taxonomic diversity of fecal microbiota associated with different metabolic phenotypes in residents of Arkhangelsk, Northwestern Russia.

IF 3.7 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Anna Postoeva, Ekaterina Krieger, Anna Leontyeva, Alexander V Kudryavtsev, Julia Galeeva, Dmitry Fedorov, Polina Kuzmichenko, Elena Ilina, Vadim Govorun
{"title":"Taxonomic diversity of fecal microbiota associated with different metabolic phenotypes in residents of Arkhangelsk, Northwestern Russia.","authors":"Anna Postoeva, Ekaterina Krieger, Anna Leontyeva, Alexander V Kudryavtsev, Julia Galeeva, Dmitry Fedorov, Polina Kuzmichenko, Elena Ilina, Vadim Govorun","doi":"10.7555/JBR.39.20250258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The study aimed to assess the taxonomic diversity and composition of gut microbiota in Arkhangelsk residents, Northwestern Russia, with varying metabolic statuses. A population-based cross-sectional \"Know Your Heart\" study (2015-2017, participants aged 35-69 years) included a health examination and gut microbiota analysis ( <i>n</i> = 685). Participants were divided into four metabolic phenotypes: metabolically healthy non-obese (MHN), metabolically unhealthy non-obese (MUN), metabolically healthy obese (MHO), and metabolically unhealthy obese (MUO). Analyses were performed using RStudio software (v.4.2.0) with the vegan and phyloseq packages (v.1.42.0) for microbiota analysis. The sample was distributed across phenotypes as follows: MHN (47.6%), MUN (22.1%), MHO (10.4%), and MUO (19.9%). Beta-diversity analysis revealed significant differences in overall microbiome composition between MUO and MHN participants, while alpha-diversity did not differ significantly across phenotypes. The MHN group was characterized by a higher abundance of beneficial commensals such as <i>Christensenellaceae R-7</i> group, <i>Ruminococcaceae UCG-005</i>, and <i>Eubacterium xylanophilum</i> group, which are taxa previously associated with metabolic health and longevity. In contrast, the MUO group showed an increased abundance of <i>Streptococcus salivarius</i> and <i>Negativibacillus</i>, taxa linked to gut dysbiosis and metabolic disorders. <i>Blautia spp</i>. emerged as a major hub in the microbiota of obese participants, consistent with its reported association with visceral fat. In conclusion, microbial composition was similar in obese participants despite metabolic dysfunction, whereas unidirectional taxonomic shifts were observed in those with metabolic dysfunction alone. The differences in the predominance of microbial taxa across metabolic phenotypes suggest that these taxa have a role in the development of metabolic disorders and obesity.</p>","PeriodicalId":15061,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomedical Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13620460/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomedical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7555/JBR.39.20250258","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study aimed to assess the taxonomic diversity and composition of gut microbiota in Arkhangelsk residents, Northwestern Russia, with varying metabolic statuses. A population-based cross-sectional "Know Your Heart" study (2015-2017, participants aged 35-69 years) included a health examination and gut microbiota analysis ( n = 685). Participants were divided into four metabolic phenotypes: metabolically healthy non-obese (MHN), metabolically unhealthy non-obese (MUN), metabolically healthy obese (MHO), and metabolically unhealthy obese (MUO). Analyses were performed using RStudio software (v.4.2.0) with the vegan and phyloseq packages (v.1.42.0) for microbiota analysis. The sample was distributed across phenotypes as follows: MHN (47.6%), MUN (22.1%), MHO (10.4%), and MUO (19.9%). Beta-diversity analysis revealed significant differences in overall microbiome composition between MUO and MHN participants, while alpha-diversity did not differ significantly across phenotypes. The MHN group was characterized by a higher abundance of beneficial commensals such as Christensenellaceae R-7 group, Ruminococcaceae UCG-005, and Eubacterium xylanophilum group, which are taxa previously associated with metabolic health and longevity. In contrast, the MUO group showed an increased abundance of Streptococcus salivarius and Negativibacillus, taxa linked to gut dysbiosis and metabolic disorders. Blautia spp. emerged as a major hub in the microbiota of obese participants, consistent with its reported association with visceral fat. In conclusion, microbial composition was similar in obese participants despite metabolic dysfunction, whereas unidirectional taxonomic shifts were observed in those with metabolic dysfunction alone. The differences in the predominance of microbial taxa across metabolic phenotypes suggest that these taxa have a role in the development of metabolic disorders and obesity.

俄罗斯西北部阿尔汉格尔斯克居民与不同代谢表型相关的粪便微生物群的分类多样性
该研究旨在评估俄罗斯西北部阿尔汉格尔斯克居民肠道微生物群的分类多样性和组成,这些居民具有不同的代谢状态。一项基于人群的横断面“了解你的心脏”研究(2015-2017年,参与者年龄在35-69岁)包括健康检查和肠道微生物群分析(n = 685)。参与者被分为四种代谢表型:代谢健康非肥胖(MHN)、代谢不健康非肥胖(MUN)、代谢健康肥胖(MHO)和代谢不健康肥胖(MUO)。分析使用RStudio软件(v.4.2.0)和vegan和phyloseq软件包(v.1.42.0)进行微生物群分析。样本的表型分布如下:MHN(47.6%)、MUN(22.1%)、MHO(10.4%)和MUO(19.9%)。β -多样性分析显示,MUO和MHN参与者的总体微生物组组成存在显著差异,而α -多样性在不同表型之间没有显著差异。MHN组具有更高丰度的有益共生菌,如Christensenellaceae R-7组、Ruminococcaceae UCG-005和嗜木真杆菌(Eubacterium xylanophilum)组,这些类群以前与代谢健康和长寿相关。相比之下,MUO组显示唾液链球菌和阴性杆菌的丰度增加,这些分类群与肠道生态失调和代谢紊乱有关。Blautia spp成为肥胖参与者微生物群的主要中心,与报道的与内脏脂肪的关联一致。综上所述,尽管存在代谢功能障碍,但肥胖参与者的微生物组成相似,而在单独存在代谢功能障碍的参与者中,微生物分类学发生了单向变化。微生物类群在代谢表型上的优势差异表明,这些类群在代谢紊乱和肥胖的发展中起作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Biomedical Research
Journal of Biomedical Research MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书