Specialised Palliative Care in Day Clinic, Hospital Unit or at Home: Which for Whom and When? A Retrospective Routine Data Analysis.

IF 2.5 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Health Services Insights Pub Date : 2025-11-03 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/11786329251388784
Julia Strupp, Stephanie Kunkel, Kevin Liu, Anne Dorr, Johannes Best, Alfred Paul, Almut Föller, Raymond Voltz
{"title":"Specialised Palliative Care in Day Clinic, Hospital Unit or at Home: Which for Whom and When? A Retrospective Routine Data Analysis.","authors":"Julia Strupp, Stephanie Kunkel, Kevin Liu, Anne Dorr, Johannes Best, Alfred Paul, Almut Föller, Raymond Voltz","doi":"10.1177/11786329251388784","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Palliative care units and specialised palliative home care teams are well established in many countries. Palliative day-care clinics, however, are not. Studies assessing which patients benefit from this setting of care are rare.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This is the first routine data analysis of patients treated in three settings of specialised palliative care within a single geographical region. Our aim was to gain understanding of how patients in this region, where specialised palliative care structures are well-established, differ in their characteristics and treatments, and to explore the potential role of a palliative day-care clinic.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective data were extracted from medical records and analysed using SPSS<sup>®</sup> and R<sup>®</sup>. Data were analysed using the Shapiro-Wilk, Chi-Square, and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Setting/Participants: Patients (n = 603) were included if they received treatment at either a palliative day-care clinic, a palliative care unit, or a specialised palliative home care service. To cover the \"normal\" pre-pandemic period, the analysis was conducted retrospectively from 31 December 2019.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients attending the palliative day-care clinic were more likely to have cancer (90%, <i>P</i> < .001), were younger than those receiving specialised palliative home care (66.1, <i>P</i> < .001), had a better ECOG performance status (2, <i>P</i> < .001) and fewer high-complexity symptom domains (3.4, <i>P</i> < .001). Patients in the palliative day-care clinic and the palliative care unit underwent similar numbers of medical procedures and interventions. The majority of patients were admitted to the palliative day-care clinic from home (76%, <i>P</i> < .001) and discharged to the palliative care unit (41.5%, <i>P</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The three care models differ in their patient populations, time-based criteria and symptom burden-with the palliative day-care clinic treating younger patients at earlier stages of the disease, with a lower ECOG score and a less complex symptom burden. These variations emphasise the importance of tailoring palliative care to the needs of patients and the progression of their disease. Recognising these differences can enhance integrated care pathways and patient-centred outcomes in various settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":12876,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Insights","volume":"18 ","pages":"11786329251388784"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12586867/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11786329251388784","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Palliative care units and specialised palliative home care teams are well established in many countries. Palliative day-care clinics, however, are not. Studies assessing which patients benefit from this setting of care are rare.

Aim: This is the first routine data analysis of patients treated in three settings of specialised palliative care within a single geographical region. Our aim was to gain understanding of how patients in this region, where specialised palliative care structures are well-established, differ in their characteristics and treatments, and to explore the potential role of a palliative day-care clinic.

Design: Retrospective data were extracted from medical records and analysed using SPSS® and R®. Data were analysed using the Shapiro-Wilk, Chi-Square, and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Setting/Participants: Patients (n = 603) were included if they received treatment at either a palliative day-care clinic, a palliative care unit, or a specialised palliative home care service. To cover the "normal" pre-pandemic period, the analysis was conducted retrospectively from 31 December 2019.

Results: Patients attending the palliative day-care clinic were more likely to have cancer (90%, P < .001), were younger than those receiving specialised palliative home care (66.1, P < .001), had a better ECOG performance status (2, P < .001) and fewer high-complexity symptom domains (3.4, P < .001). Patients in the palliative day-care clinic and the palliative care unit underwent similar numbers of medical procedures and interventions. The majority of patients were admitted to the palliative day-care clinic from home (76%, P < .001) and discharged to the palliative care unit (41.5%, P < .001).

Conclusions: The three care models differ in their patient populations, time-based criteria and symptom burden-with the palliative day-care clinic treating younger patients at earlier stages of the disease, with a lower ECOG score and a less complex symptom burden. These variations emphasise the importance of tailoring palliative care to the needs of patients and the progression of their disease. Recognising these differences can enhance integrated care pathways and patient-centred outcomes in various settings.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

专科姑息治疗在日间诊所、医院病房还是在家:什么时候为谁服务?回顾性常规数据分析。
背景:在许多国家,姑息治疗单位和专门的姑息家庭护理小组已经建立起来。然而,姑息性日间护理诊所却不是。评估哪些患者从这种护理环境中受益的研究很少。目的:这是第一个常规数据分析患者在三个设置专门姑息治疗在一个单一的地理区域。我们的目的是了解这个地区的患者,在专门的姑息治疗结构已经建立起来的地方,他们的特点和治疗方法是如何不同的,并探索姑息日托诊所的潜在作用。设计:从医疗记录中提取回顾性数据,并使用SPSS®和R®进行分析。数据分析采用夏皮罗-威尔克检验、卡方检验和Kruskal-Wallis检验。环境/参与者:患者(n = 603)被纳入,如果他们在姑息性日间护理诊所、姑息性护理单位或专门的姑息性家庭护理服务接受治疗。为涵盖大流行前的“正常”时期,回顾性分析从2019年12月31日开始。结论:三种护理模式在患者群体、基于时间的标准和症状负担方面存在差异,姑息性日托诊所治疗的患者年龄较小,处于疾病早期阶段,ECOG评分较低,症状负担较轻。这些差异强调了根据患者的需要和疾病的进展量身定制姑息治疗的重要性。认识到这些差异可以在各种环境中加强综合护理途径和以患者为中心的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Services Insights
Health Services Insights HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书