Effect of Bioactive Glass on Microshear Bond Strength of Composite Resin to Dentin Using a Universal Adhesive with Different Application Modes and Storage Times.

Q3 Dentistry
Frontiers in Dentistry Pub Date : 2025-06-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.18502/fid.v22i24.18868
Seyed Mostafa Mosavinasab, Kamyar Fathpoor, Babak Sarrafpoor, Sepidehsaadat Mosavinasab, Mohamad Hossein Fakour
{"title":"Effect of Bioactive Glass on Microshear Bond Strength of Composite Resin to Dentin Using a Universal Adhesive with Different Application Modes and Storage Times.","authors":"Seyed Mostafa Mosavinasab, Kamyar Fathpoor, Babak Sarrafpoor, Sepidehsaadat Mosavinasab, Mohamad Hossein Fakour","doi":"10.18502/fid.v22i24.18868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> This study evaluated the effect of bioactive glass (BAG) in different forms on microshear bond strength (µSBS) of composite resin to dentin using a universal adhesive in self-etch (SE) and etch-and-rinse (E&R) modes after different storage times. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> In this in vitro study, 120 extracted human third molars were sectioned 3mm occlusal to their cementoenamel junction to expose dentin. The teeth were then randomly assigned to three groups (n=40): (I) 20% BAG suspension for dentin pretreatment, (II) 1% BAG-modified adhesive (G2-Bond Universal), and (III) BAG-free control group. Each group was subdivided based on the adhesive application mode (SE or E&R) and storage time (immediate at 24 hours, or delayed at 3 months), with 10 teeth per each subgroup. The µSBS was measured by a universal testing machine. Data were analyzed by three-way and two-way ANOVA, followed by the Tukey's post-hoc test (α=0.05). <b>Results:</b> Three-way ANOVA showed significant interaction effect of BAG incorporation and storage time on µSBS (P=0.017); while other interactions were not significant (P>0.05). The effects of BAG incorporation (P=0.951) and application mode (P=0.769) were not significant on immediate µSBS (P>0.05). After 3 months, the 1% BAG-modified adhesive showed a significantly higher µSBS than the 20% BAG suspension (P=0.001) and the control group (P<0.001), with no significant effect of application mode (P=0.417). <b>Conclusion:</b> BAG incorporation did not affect the immediate µSBS of the adhesive but improved its long-term durability, such that the 1% BAG-modified adhesive showed the highest delayed µSBS, regardless of the application mode.</p>","PeriodicalId":12445,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Dentistry","volume":"22 ","pages":"24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12588102/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/fid.v22i24.18868","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study evaluated the effect of bioactive glass (BAG) in different forms on microshear bond strength (µSBS) of composite resin to dentin using a universal adhesive in self-etch (SE) and etch-and-rinse (E&R) modes after different storage times. Materials and Methods: In this in vitro study, 120 extracted human third molars were sectioned 3mm occlusal to their cementoenamel junction to expose dentin. The teeth were then randomly assigned to three groups (n=40): (I) 20% BAG suspension for dentin pretreatment, (II) 1% BAG-modified adhesive (G2-Bond Universal), and (III) BAG-free control group. Each group was subdivided based on the adhesive application mode (SE or E&R) and storage time (immediate at 24 hours, or delayed at 3 months), with 10 teeth per each subgroup. The µSBS was measured by a universal testing machine. Data were analyzed by three-way and two-way ANOVA, followed by the Tukey's post-hoc test (α=0.05). Results: Three-way ANOVA showed significant interaction effect of BAG incorporation and storage time on µSBS (P=0.017); while other interactions were not significant (P>0.05). The effects of BAG incorporation (P=0.951) and application mode (P=0.769) were not significant on immediate µSBS (P>0.05). After 3 months, the 1% BAG-modified adhesive showed a significantly higher µSBS than the 20% BAG suspension (P=0.001) and the control group (P<0.001), with no significant effect of application mode (P=0.417). Conclusion: BAG incorporation did not affect the immediate µSBS of the adhesive but improved its long-term durability, such that the 1% BAG-modified adhesive showed the highest delayed µSBS, regardless of the application mode.

生物活性玻璃对复合树脂与牙本质微剪切粘接强度的影响。
目的:研究不同形态的生物活性玻璃(BAG)在自蚀刻(SE)和蚀刻-冲洗(E&R)两种不同保存时间下对复合树脂与牙本质微剪切结合强度(µSBS)的影响。材料与方法:在体外实验中,取出120颗人第三磨牙,在牙骨质与牙釉质交界处处切面3mm,暴露牙本质。然后将牙齿随机分为3组(n=40):(I) 20% BAG悬浮液用于牙本质预处理,(II) 1% BAG改性粘接剂(G2-Bond Universal), (III)无BAG对照组。根据粘接方式(SE或E&R)和保存时间(即刻24小时或延迟3个月)再分组,每组10牙。µSBS由通用试验机测量。数据采用三向和双向方差分析,并进行Tukey事后检验(α=0.05)。结果:三因素方差分析显示,BAG掺入与储存时间对µSBS有显著的交互作用(P=0.017);其他交互作用不显著(P < 0.05)。BAG掺入方式(P=0.951)和应用方式(P=0.769)对即刻µSBS无显著影响(P < 0.05)。3个月后,1% BAG-改性胶粘剂的延迟µSBS明显高于20% BAG悬浮液(P=0.001)和对照组(P)。结论:BAG掺入不影响胶粘剂的即时µSBS,但提高了其长期耐久性,因此,无论应用方式如何,1% BAG-改性胶粘剂的延迟µSBS最高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Dentistry
Frontiers in Dentistry Dentistry-General Dentistry
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书