Effect of Bioactive Glass on Microshear Bond Strength of Composite Resin to Dentin Using a Universal Adhesive with Different Application Modes and Storage Times.
{"title":"Effect of Bioactive Glass on Microshear Bond Strength of Composite Resin to Dentin Using a Universal Adhesive with Different Application Modes and Storage Times.","authors":"Seyed Mostafa Mosavinasab, Kamyar Fathpoor, Babak Sarrafpoor, Sepidehsaadat Mosavinasab, Mohamad Hossein Fakour","doi":"10.18502/fid.v22i24.18868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> This study evaluated the effect of bioactive glass (BAG) in different forms on microshear bond strength (µSBS) of composite resin to dentin using a universal adhesive in self-etch (SE) and etch-and-rinse (E&R) modes after different storage times. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> In this in vitro study, 120 extracted human third molars were sectioned 3mm occlusal to their cementoenamel junction to expose dentin. The teeth were then randomly assigned to three groups (n=40): (I) 20% BAG suspension for dentin pretreatment, (II) 1% BAG-modified adhesive (G2-Bond Universal), and (III) BAG-free control group. Each group was subdivided based on the adhesive application mode (SE or E&R) and storage time (immediate at 24 hours, or delayed at 3 months), with 10 teeth per each subgroup. The µSBS was measured by a universal testing machine. Data were analyzed by three-way and two-way ANOVA, followed by the Tukey's post-hoc test (α=0.05). <b>Results:</b> Three-way ANOVA showed significant interaction effect of BAG incorporation and storage time on µSBS (P=0.017); while other interactions were not significant (P>0.05). The effects of BAG incorporation (P=0.951) and application mode (P=0.769) were not significant on immediate µSBS (P>0.05). After 3 months, the 1% BAG-modified adhesive showed a significantly higher µSBS than the 20% BAG suspension (P=0.001) and the control group (P<0.001), with no significant effect of application mode (P=0.417). <b>Conclusion:</b> BAG incorporation did not affect the immediate µSBS of the adhesive but improved its long-term durability, such that the 1% BAG-modified adhesive showed the highest delayed µSBS, regardless of the application mode.</p>","PeriodicalId":12445,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Dentistry","volume":"22 ","pages":"24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12588102/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/fid.v22i24.18868","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: This study evaluated the effect of bioactive glass (BAG) in different forms on microshear bond strength (µSBS) of composite resin to dentin using a universal adhesive in self-etch (SE) and etch-and-rinse (E&R) modes after different storage times. Materials and Methods: In this in vitro study, 120 extracted human third molars were sectioned 3mm occlusal to their cementoenamel junction to expose dentin. The teeth were then randomly assigned to three groups (n=40): (I) 20% BAG suspension for dentin pretreatment, (II) 1% BAG-modified adhesive (G2-Bond Universal), and (III) BAG-free control group. Each group was subdivided based on the adhesive application mode (SE or E&R) and storage time (immediate at 24 hours, or delayed at 3 months), with 10 teeth per each subgroup. The µSBS was measured by a universal testing machine. Data were analyzed by three-way and two-way ANOVA, followed by the Tukey's post-hoc test (α=0.05). Results: Three-way ANOVA showed significant interaction effect of BAG incorporation and storage time on µSBS (P=0.017); while other interactions were not significant (P>0.05). The effects of BAG incorporation (P=0.951) and application mode (P=0.769) were not significant on immediate µSBS (P>0.05). After 3 months, the 1% BAG-modified adhesive showed a significantly higher µSBS than the 20% BAG suspension (P=0.001) and the control group (P<0.001), with no significant effect of application mode (P=0.417). Conclusion: BAG incorporation did not affect the immediate µSBS of the adhesive but improved its long-term durability, such that the 1% BAG-modified adhesive showed the highest delayed µSBS, regardless of the application mode.