[Clinical and neuropsychological criteria for the early determination of Mild Cognitive Impairment: a review and critical discussion].

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Fortschritte Der Neurologie Psychiatrie Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-06 DOI:10.1055/a-2708-3750
Ann-Katrin Schild, Claudia Bartels
{"title":"[Clinical and neuropsychological criteria for the early determination of Mild Cognitive Impairment: a review and critical discussion].","authors":"Ann-Katrin Schild, Claudia Bartels","doi":"10.1055/a-2708-3750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since its introduction in 1999, the clinical syndrome Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) has been established in scientific and clinical practice. Technical and scientific advances made it necessary to regularly update research criteria, resulting in a shift to a more biological definition and biomarker-based criteria, while clinical core criteria remained essentially unchanged. The cognitive core criterion (objective evidence of cognitive impairment) allows concrete operationalization and has, in turn, led to the development of various neuropsychological criteria. Approaches more sensitive to early cognitive changes or taking greater account of cognitive decline may also be further elaborated for their future use. In general, certain conditions must be met for the use of neuropsychological criteria, such as the assessment of relevant cognitive domains with appropriately standardized test procedures to a sufficient extent. Standardized and consistent criteria use could reduce the high rates of variation observed in MCI prevalence rates and could help harmonizing prognostic evaluations and treatment decisions in routine clinical practice. Surveys of the status quo in German memory clinics suggest that there is a basis to possibly reach consensus on a set of criteria across institutions. Despite a potential commitment to specific neuropsychological criteria, clinical judgment appropriately considering individual factors would remain decisive for an MCI diagnosis and thus leaving existing MCI clinical core criteria untouched. The present work provides an overview on clinical and neuropsychological MCI criteria, discusses their challenges and future perspectives to timely and adequately detect first meaningful cognitive changes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12353,"journal":{"name":"Fortschritte Der Neurologie Psychiatrie","volume":"93 11","pages":"461-473"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fortschritte Der Neurologie Psychiatrie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2708-3750","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since its introduction in 1999, the clinical syndrome Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) has been established in scientific and clinical practice. Technical and scientific advances made it necessary to regularly update research criteria, resulting in a shift to a more biological definition and biomarker-based criteria, while clinical core criteria remained essentially unchanged. The cognitive core criterion (objective evidence of cognitive impairment) allows concrete operationalization and has, in turn, led to the development of various neuropsychological criteria. Approaches more sensitive to early cognitive changes or taking greater account of cognitive decline may also be further elaborated for their future use. In general, certain conditions must be met for the use of neuropsychological criteria, such as the assessment of relevant cognitive domains with appropriately standardized test procedures to a sufficient extent. Standardized and consistent criteria use could reduce the high rates of variation observed in MCI prevalence rates and could help harmonizing prognostic evaluations and treatment decisions in routine clinical practice. Surveys of the status quo in German memory clinics suggest that there is a basis to possibly reach consensus on a set of criteria across institutions. Despite a potential commitment to specific neuropsychological criteria, clinical judgment appropriately considering individual factors would remain decisive for an MCI diagnosis and thus leaving existing MCI clinical core criteria untouched. The present work provides an overview on clinical and neuropsychological MCI criteria, discusses their challenges and future perspectives to timely and adequately detect first meaningful cognitive changes.

[轻度认知障碍早期诊断的临床和神经心理学标准:综述和批判性讨论]。
自1999年被提出以来,轻度认知障碍(Mild Cognitive Impairment, MCI)这一临床综合征已经在科学和临床实践中得到确立。技术和科学的进步使得有必要定期更新研究标准,导致转向更多的生物学定义和基于生物标志物的标准,而临床核心标准基本保持不变。认知核心标准(认知障碍的客观证据)允许具体的操作化,并反过来导致各种神经心理学标准的发展。对早期认知变化更敏感或更多地考虑到认知衰退的方法也可以进一步阐述以供将来使用。一般来说,使用神经心理学标准必须满足一定的条件,例如用适当的标准化测试程序在足够程度上评估相关的认知领域。使用标准化和一致的标准可以降低MCI患病率观察到的高变异性,并有助于在常规临床实践中协调预后评估和治疗决策。对德国记忆诊所现状的调查表明,有可能在跨机构的一套标准上达成共识。尽管对特定的神经心理学标准有潜在的承诺,但适当考虑个体因素的临床判断仍然是MCI诊断的决定性因素,从而使现有的MCI临床核心标准保持不变。目前的工作概述了临床和神经心理学MCI标准,讨论了他们的挑战和未来的观点,以及时和充分地检测第一次有意义的认知变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
139
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Fundiertes Wissen für den Berufsalltag Relevante Originalarbeiten Informative Übersichten zu wichtigen Themen Fortbildungsteil mit Zertifizierung – 36 CME-Punkte pro Jahr Interessante Kasuistiken Referiert & kommentiert: Internationale Studien Aktuelles zu Begutachtung und Neurobiologie International gelistet und häufig zitiert
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书