Efficacy and risks of artificial intelligence chatbots for anxiety and depression: a narrative review of recent clinical studies.

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Current Opinion in Psychiatry Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-22 DOI:10.1097/YCO.0000000000001048
Rebekah Bodner, Katherine Lim, Renee Schneider, John Torous
{"title":"Efficacy and risks of artificial intelligence chatbots for anxiety and depression: a narrative review of recent clinical studies.","authors":"Rebekah Bodner, Katherine Lim, Renee Schneider, John Torous","doi":"10.1097/YCO.0000000000001048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The rapidly growing environment of artificial intelligence (AI) has accelerated interest in its potential use for improving the efficiency and efficacy of the healthcare industry. Specifically, there has been a growing interest in AI role mental healthcare for common disorders like anxiety and depression. However, it remains unclear whether current evidence is sufficient to determine efficacy and safety of AI chatbots in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Most studies reported symptom reductions on validated anxiety and depression measures; however, the majority lacked appropriate active control conditions, featured small and demographically narrow samples, and used inconsistent outcome metrics, limiting generalizability and replication. Reporting of adverse events was rare, and potential risks such as emotional dependence and parasocial relationships were largely unexamined.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>This paper offers a review of the recent literature (February 2024 and July 2025) regarding AI effectiveness in treating anxiety and depression. While findings suggest that AI chatbots are feasible and acceptable to users, current evidence is insufficient to determine their efficacy or safety in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":11022,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"19-25"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/YCO.0000000000001048","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: The rapidly growing environment of artificial intelligence (AI) has accelerated interest in its potential use for improving the efficiency and efficacy of the healthcare industry. Specifically, there has been a growing interest in AI role mental healthcare for common disorders like anxiety and depression. However, it remains unclear whether current evidence is sufficient to determine efficacy and safety of AI chatbots in clinical practice.

Recent findings: Most studies reported symptom reductions on validated anxiety and depression measures; however, the majority lacked appropriate active control conditions, featured small and demographically narrow samples, and used inconsistent outcome metrics, limiting generalizability and replication. Reporting of adverse events was rare, and potential risks such as emotional dependence and parasocial relationships were largely unexamined.

Summary: This paper offers a review of the recent literature (February 2024 and July 2025) regarding AI effectiveness in treating anxiety and depression. While findings suggest that AI chatbots are feasible and acceptable to users, current evidence is insufficient to determine their efficacy or safety in clinical practice.

人工智能聊天机器人治疗焦虑和抑郁的功效和风险:近期临床研究的叙述性回顾。
综述目的:快速发展的人工智能(AI)环境加速了人们对其在提高医疗保健行业效率和功效方面的潜在用途的兴趣。具体来说,人们对人工智能在焦虑和抑郁等常见疾病中的作用越来越感兴趣。然而,目前尚不清楚目前的证据是否足以确定人工智能聊天机器人在临床实践中的有效性和安全性。最近的发现:大多数研究报告了有效的焦虑和抑郁措施的症状减轻;然而,大多数缺乏适当的主动控制条件,样本量小且人口统计学范围窄,使用不一致的结果指标,限制了推广和复制。不良事件的报道很少,潜在的风险,如情感依赖和副社会关系,在很大程度上没有得到检查。摘要:本文回顾了最近关于人工智能治疗焦虑和抑郁的有效性的文献(2024年2月和2025年7月)。虽然研究结果表明人工智能聊天机器人对用户来说是可行和可接受的,但目前的证据不足以确定其在临床实践中的有效性或安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Psychiatry
Current Opinion in Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
1.40%
发文量
76
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Current Opinion in Psychiatry is an easy-to-digest bimonthly journal covering the most interesting and important advances in the field of psychiatry. Eight sections on mental health disorders including schizophrenia, neurodevelopmental disorders and eating disorders, are presented alongside five area-specific sections, offering an expert evaluation on the most exciting developments in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书