The incidence of dementia in populations around the globe.

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Current Opinion in Psychiatry Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-31 DOI:10.1097/YCO.0000000000001053
Ashleigh S Vella, Susanne Roehr, Perminder S Sachdev
{"title":"The incidence of dementia in populations around the globe.","authors":"Ashleigh S Vella, Susanne Roehr, Perminder S Sachdev","doi":"10.1097/YCO.0000000000001053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review synthesizes recent advancements in understanding global dementia incidence while recognizing research inequities that hinder accurate estimates, especially among low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and ethnoracial minorities. We highlight data gaps and outline opportunities to address these inequities, emphasizing the importance of diversity to achieve more reliable estimates.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Dementia incidence varies geographically; however, global estimates remain skewed due to under-representation and underdiagnosis in LMICs and minorities. While evidence from Europe and the USA show declining incidence, this trend is not universal with increases in Japan, Taiwan, and South Korea. Therefore, forecasted estimates assuming stable incidence, leave health systems underprepared. Risk factors like apolipoprotein Eε4 status show population-specific effects with a strong link to dementia incidence in Western but attenuated effects in African populations. Hence, variation in modifiable and protective factors call for country-specific estimates and interventions, based on diverse representative samples.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Recent findings bring into focus the urgent need for high-quality longitudinal representative datasets, especially among under-researched LMICs and diverse ethnoracial groups. Investment into locally led cohort studies, culturally sensitive assessments and harmonization procedures, equitable collaborations, and methodological transparency will improve incidence accuracy, guiding population-specific interventions and public health policy.</p>","PeriodicalId":11022,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"168-174"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13259594/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/YCO.0000000000001053","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: This review synthesizes recent advancements in understanding global dementia incidence while recognizing research inequities that hinder accurate estimates, especially among low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and ethnoracial minorities. We highlight data gaps and outline opportunities to address these inequities, emphasizing the importance of diversity to achieve more reliable estimates.

Recent findings: Dementia incidence varies geographically; however, global estimates remain skewed due to under-representation and underdiagnosis in LMICs and minorities. While evidence from Europe and the USA show declining incidence, this trend is not universal with increases in Japan, Taiwan, and South Korea. Therefore, forecasted estimates assuming stable incidence, leave health systems underprepared. Risk factors like apolipoprotein Eε4 status show population-specific effects with a strong link to dementia incidence in Western but attenuated effects in African populations. Hence, variation in modifiable and protective factors call for country-specific estimates and interventions, based on diverse representative samples.

Summary: Recent findings bring into focus the urgent need for high-quality longitudinal representative datasets, especially among under-researched LMICs and diverse ethnoracial groups. Investment into locally led cohort studies, culturally sensitive assessments and harmonization procedures, equitable collaborations, and methodological transparency will improve incidence accuracy, guiding population-specific interventions and public health policy.

痴呆症在全球人群中的发病率。
综述目的:本综述综合了在了解全球痴呆症发病率方面的最新进展,同时认识到阻碍准确估计的研究不公平,特别是在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)和少数民族中。我们强调了数据差距,概述了解决这些不平等的机会,强调了多样性对实现更可靠估计的重要性。最近的研究发现:痴呆症的发病率在地理上存在差异;然而,由于低收入国家和少数群体的代表性不足和诊断不足,全球估计数仍然存在偏差。虽然来自欧洲和美国的证据表明发病率在下降,但这种趋势并不普遍,日本、台湾和韩国的发病率在上升。因此,假设发病率稳定的预测估计值使卫生系统准备不足。载脂蛋白ε4状态等风险因素显示出人群特异性影响,与西方人群的痴呆发病率密切相关,但对非洲人群的影响较弱。因此,可改变和保护性因素的变化要求根据不同的代表性样本进行具体国家的估计和干预。摘要:最近的研究结果表明,迫切需要高质量的纵向代表性数据集,特别是在研究不足的中低收入国家和不同的种族群体中。投资于地方主导的队列研究、对文化敏感的评估和协调程序、公平合作以及方法透明度,将提高发病率的准确性,指导针对特定人群的干预措施和公共卫生政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Psychiatry
Current Opinion in Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
1.40%
发文量
76
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Current Opinion in Psychiatry is an easy-to-digest bimonthly journal covering the most interesting and important advances in the field of psychiatry. Eight sections on mental health disorders including schizophrenia, neurodevelopmental disorders and eating disorders, are presented alongside five area-specific sections, offering an expert evaluation on the most exciting developments in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书