The role of cardiovascular disease as a mediator in mitigating the impact of ambient PM2.5 on dementia risk.

IF 4.2 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Environmental Epidemiology Pub Date : 2025-11-04 eCollection Date: 2025-12-01 DOI:10.1097/EE9.0000000000000436
Chengyi Lin, Yechi Zhang, Andrew T DeWan, Laura Forastiere, Kai Chen
{"title":"The role of cardiovascular disease as a mediator in mitigating the impact of ambient PM<sub>2.5</sub> on dementia risk.","authors":"Chengyi Lin, Yechi Zhang, Andrew T DeWan, Laura Forastiere, Kai Chen","doi":"10.1097/EE9.0000000000000436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous research suggested that stricter ambient particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to 2.5 μm (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) standards would reduce the risk of dementia, but immediate reductions in PM<sub>2.5</sub> levels are not always feasible. Limited studies have quantified the extent to which cardiovascular disease (CVD) interventions could mitigate the effect of not achieving stricter PM<sub>2.5</sub> standards on dementia risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 283,813 participants in the UK Biobank cohort aged ≥60 years without dementia diagnosis or CVD hospitalization at baseline (2015). We applied the longitudinal targeted maximum likelihood estimation to estimate the total effect of no PM<sub>2.5</sub> intervention compared with hypothetical PM<sub>2.5</sub> interventions on the 5-year risk of dementia. We also estimated the controlled direct effect by setting all participants free from CVD hospitalization in both scenarios.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with the hypothetical intervention of reducing PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure by 10% if it is above the standard of 10 µg/m<sup>3</sup>, the total effect of no PM<sub>2.5</sub> intervention increased the 5-year dementia risk by 3.77 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.47, 4.39) cases per 1000 participants. By setting all participants free from CVD hospitalization, the controlled direct effect was an increase of 2.82 (95% CI = 0.74, 3.30) cases per 1000 participants. The proportion of the total effect that could be mitigated by preventing CVD hospitalization was 25.27% (95% CI = 17.49%, 49.42%) among all eligible participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Part of the effect of not achieving stricter ambient PM<sub>2.5</sub> standards on dementia risk could be mitigated by preventing CVD hospitalization in the UK Biobank cohort. This finding indicates the potential of promoting cardiovascular health to reduce dementia burden.</p>","PeriodicalId":11713,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Epidemiology","volume":"9 6","pages":"e436"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12588692/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/EE9.0000000000000436","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Previous research suggested that stricter ambient particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to 2.5 μm (PM2.5) standards would reduce the risk of dementia, but immediate reductions in PM2.5 levels are not always feasible. Limited studies have quantified the extent to which cardiovascular disease (CVD) interventions could mitigate the effect of not achieving stricter PM2.5 standards on dementia risk.

Methods: This study included 283,813 participants in the UK Biobank cohort aged ≥60 years without dementia diagnosis or CVD hospitalization at baseline (2015). We applied the longitudinal targeted maximum likelihood estimation to estimate the total effect of no PM2.5 intervention compared with hypothetical PM2.5 interventions on the 5-year risk of dementia. We also estimated the controlled direct effect by setting all participants free from CVD hospitalization in both scenarios.

Results: Compared with the hypothetical intervention of reducing PM2.5 exposure by 10% if it is above the standard of 10 µg/m3, the total effect of no PM2.5 intervention increased the 5-year dementia risk by 3.77 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.47, 4.39) cases per 1000 participants. By setting all participants free from CVD hospitalization, the controlled direct effect was an increase of 2.82 (95% CI = 0.74, 3.30) cases per 1000 participants. The proportion of the total effect that could be mitigated by preventing CVD hospitalization was 25.27% (95% CI = 17.49%, 49.42%) among all eligible participants.

Conclusion: Part of the effect of not achieving stricter ambient PM2.5 standards on dementia risk could be mitigated by preventing CVD hospitalization in the UK Biobank cohort. This finding indicates the potential of promoting cardiovascular health to reduce dementia burden.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

心血管疾病在减轻环境PM2.5对痴呆风险影响中的中介作用
背景:先前的研究表明,更严格的空气动力学直径小于或等于2.5 μm (PM2.5)的环境颗粒物标准可以降低痴呆症的风险,但PM2.5水平的立即降低并不总是可行的。有限的研究量化了心血管疾病(CVD)干预措施在多大程度上可以减轻未达到更严格的PM2.5标准对痴呆风险的影响。方法:本研究纳入了英国生物银行(UK Biobank)年龄≥60岁、基线时无痴呆诊断或心血管疾病住院的283813名参与者(2015年)。我们应用纵向目标最大似然估计来估计没有PM2.5干预与假设PM2.5干预对5年痴呆风险的总影响。我们还通过在两种情况下设置所有参与者没有心血管疾病住院治疗来估计控制的直接效应。结果:与PM2.5浓度高于10µg/m3标准时减少10%的假设干预相比,不进行PM2.5干预的总效果使每1000名参与者的5年痴呆风险增加3.77例(95%置信区间[CI] = 1.47, 4.39)。通过让所有参与者都没有心血管疾病住院治疗,控制的直接效果是每1000名参与者增加2.82例(95% CI = 0.74, 3.30)。在所有符合条件的受试者中,通过预防心血管疾病住院而减轻的总效应比例为25.27% (95% CI = 17.49%, 49.42%)。结论:在英国生物银行队列中,未达到更严格的环境PM2.5标准对痴呆风险的部分影响可以通过预防心血管疾病住院来缓解。这一发现表明了促进心血管健康以减轻痴呆负担的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Epidemiology
Environmental Epidemiology Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
2.80%
发文量
71
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书