Treatment and Prevention of Dental Caries in Children via a Theory-Based Behavioural Intervention Led by Health Promoters: A Health Economic Evaluation.
Sara Björns, Eva-Karin Bergström, Peter Lingström, Katharina Wretlind, Marlene Makenzius
{"title":"Treatment and Prevention of Dental Caries in Children via a Theory-Based Behavioural Intervention Led by Health Promoters: A Health Economic Evaluation.","authors":"Sara Björns, Eva-Karin Bergström, Peter Lingström, Katharina Wretlind, Marlene Makenzius","doi":"10.1159/000549409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Dental caries remains a prevalent condition with significant health and economic repercussions. To address persistent oral health disparities and reduce the burden of dental caries among preschoolers in Sweden, this study aimed to evaluate the clinical and economic impact of implementing a theory-based behavioural intervention delivered by health promoters in clinics serving children at elevated risk for caries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort design was applied, comparing clinics using a theory-based behavioural intervention led by health promoters with clinics using the Recommended Programme for Caries Treatment (RPCT). The cohort were children aged 3-6 years identified as being at increased caries risk in Region Västra Götaland during 2021-2023. Three analytic approaches were employed: (1) budget impact analysis (BIA) to measure net costs and resource shifts; (2) difference-in-differences (DiD) to compare mean decayed, extracted, or filled teeth (deft) in intervention versus control clinics; and (3) cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) to estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The BIA showed that the theory-based behavioural intervention led by health promoters incurred higher initial personnel costs than the RPCT but required fewer clinical hours - an opportunity cost that, if redeployed to clinical activity, could partially offset these expenses. The DiD showed that, over 3 years, clinics implementing the intervention achieved a statistically significant reduction of 0.26 deft among 6-year-olds. The CEA estimated the ICER to be 2,142 SEK (199 EUR) per deft prevented, which improved to 513-810 SEK (48-75 EUR) when the economic value of the liberated work hours was included.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A theory-based behavioural intervention led by health promoters reduced caries risk among high-risk preschoolers and may enable improved resource allocation, contingent on the redeployment of freed hours. Despite higher initial personnel costs, the approach demonstrated favourable cost-effectiveness over time, supporting its integration into public dental care systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":9620,"journal":{"name":"Caries Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12707911/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Caries Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000549409","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Dental caries remains a prevalent condition with significant health and economic repercussions. To address persistent oral health disparities and reduce the burden of dental caries among preschoolers in Sweden, this study aimed to evaluate the clinical and economic impact of implementing a theory-based behavioural intervention delivered by health promoters in clinics serving children at elevated risk for caries.
Methods: A retrospective cohort design was applied, comparing clinics using a theory-based behavioural intervention led by health promoters with clinics using the Recommended Programme for Caries Treatment (RPCT). The cohort were children aged 3-6 years identified as being at increased caries risk in Region Västra Götaland during 2021-2023. Three analytic approaches were employed: (1) budget impact analysis (BIA) to measure net costs and resource shifts; (2) difference-in-differences (DiD) to compare mean decayed, extracted, or filled teeth (deft) in intervention versus control clinics; and (3) cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) to estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER).
Results: The BIA showed that the theory-based behavioural intervention led by health promoters incurred higher initial personnel costs than the RPCT but required fewer clinical hours - an opportunity cost that, if redeployed to clinical activity, could partially offset these expenses. The DiD showed that, over 3 years, clinics implementing the intervention achieved a statistically significant reduction of 0.26 deft among 6-year-olds. The CEA estimated the ICER to be 2,142 SEK (199 EUR) per deft prevented, which improved to 513-810 SEK (48-75 EUR) when the economic value of the liberated work hours was included.
Conclusion: A theory-based behavioural intervention led by health promoters reduced caries risk among high-risk preschoolers and may enable improved resource allocation, contingent on the redeployment of freed hours. Despite higher initial personnel costs, the approach demonstrated favourable cost-effectiveness over time, supporting its integration into public dental care systems.
期刊介绍:
''Caries Research'' publishes epidemiological, clinical and laboratory studies in dental caries, erosion and related dental diseases. Some studies build on the considerable advances already made in caries prevention, e.g. through fluoride application. Some aim to improve understanding of the increasingly important problem of dental erosion and the associated tooth wear process. Others monitor the changing pattern of caries in different populations, explore improved methods of diagnosis or evaluate methods of prevention or treatment. The broad coverage of current research has given the journal an international reputation as an indispensable source for both basic scientists and clinicians engaged in understanding, investigating and preventing dental disease.