Comparative Evaluation of Crassphage, Pepper Mild Mottle Virus, and Human Mastadenovirus as Indicators of Human Fecal Contamination in Surface Water

IF 2.4 2区 农林科学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Shênia Patricia Corrêa Novo, André Vinicius Costa Ribeiro, Bruna Barbosa de Paula, Patricia Emilia Bento Moura, Camille Ferreira Mannarino, Adriana Gonçalves Maranhão, Fernando Cesar Ferreira, Thiago Santos dos Leal, Marize Pereira Miagostovich
{"title":"Comparative Evaluation of Crassphage, Pepper Mild Mottle Virus, and Human Mastadenovirus as Indicators of Human Fecal Contamination in Surface Water","authors":"Shênia Patricia Corrêa Novo,&nbsp;André Vinicius Costa Ribeiro,&nbsp;Bruna Barbosa de Paula,&nbsp;Patricia Emilia Bento Moura,&nbsp;Camille Ferreira Mannarino,&nbsp;Adriana Gonçalves Maranhão,&nbsp;Fernando Cesar Ferreira,&nbsp;Thiago Santos dos Leal,&nbsp;Marize Pereira Miagostovich","doi":"10.1007/s12560-025-09666-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study assessed the presence and concentration of crAssphage, pepper mild mottle virus (PMMoV) and human mastadenovirus (HAdV) as potential indicators of human fecal contamination in different aquatic matrices. A total of 75 stream and seawater samples were collected between 2020 and 2021 across four watersheds displaying varying urbanization degrees in Brazil. Viral particles were concentrated employing the adsorption-elution method followed by ultrafiltration and quantified by qPCR/RT-qPCR. The findings indicate that crAssphage was the most frequently detected (65.33%), followed by PMMoV (45.33%) and HAdV (44.00%). CrAssphage also exhibited the highest viral loads in stream water (median of 6.49 log₁₀ GC L⁻¹), reflecting a strong association with domestic sewage. Comparatively, PMMoV showed similar detection rates in both matrices, whereas HAdV exhibited higher detection rates in stream water. Higher crAssphage and PMMoV concentrations were observed in watersheds located in higher population density areas when compared to lower density areas. No viruses were detected upstream of the urbanized regions, confirming the specificity of the selected viral indicators. In this sense, crAssphage and HAdV are more suitable for monitoring stream water bodies affected by human activities, while PMMoV is suited for both matrices. The findings suggest that the three viruses emerged as promising indicators for tracking human fecal contamination in aquatic matrices with different characteristics.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":563,"journal":{"name":"Food and Environmental Virology","volume":"17 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food and Environmental Virology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12560-025-09666-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study assessed the presence and concentration of crAssphage, pepper mild mottle virus (PMMoV) and human mastadenovirus (HAdV) as potential indicators of human fecal contamination in different aquatic matrices. A total of 75 stream and seawater samples were collected between 2020 and 2021 across four watersheds displaying varying urbanization degrees in Brazil. Viral particles were concentrated employing the adsorption-elution method followed by ultrafiltration and quantified by qPCR/RT-qPCR. The findings indicate that crAssphage was the most frequently detected (65.33%), followed by PMMoV (45.33%) and HAdV (44.00%). CrAssphage also exhibited the highest viral loads in stream water (median of 6.49 log₁₀ GC L⁻¹), reflecting a strong association with domestic sewage. Comparatively, PMMoV showed similar detection rates in both matrices, whereas HAdV exhibited higher detection rates in stream water. Higher crAssphage and PMMoV concentrations were observed in watersheds located in higher population density areas when compared to lower density areas. No viruses were detected upstream of the urbanized regions, confirming the specificity of the selected viral indicators. In this sense, crAssphage and HAdV are more suitable for monitoring stream water bodies affected by human activities, while PMMoV is suited for both matrices. The findings suggest that the three viruses emerged as promising indicators for tracking human fecal contamination in aquatic matrices with different characteristics.

地表水中草囊病毒、辣椒轻度斑驳病毒和人类乳腺病毒作为人类粪便污染指标的比较评价
本研究评估了不同水生基质中人粪便污染的潜在指标——草球、辣椒轻度斑驳病毒(PMMoV)和人乳腺病毒(HAdV)的存在和浓度。2020年至2021年期间,在巴西四个不同城市化程度的流域共收集了75个溪流和海水样本。采用吸附-洗脱法浓缩病毒颗粒,然后超滤,采用qPCR/RT-qPCR定量。结果显示,crAssphage的检出率最高(65.33%),其次是PMMoV(45.33%)和hav(44.00%)。CrAssphage在溪水中也表现出最高的病毒载量(中位数为6.49 log₁₀GC L⁻¹),这反映了它与生活污水的密切联系。相比之下,PMMoV在两种基质中的检出率相似,而hav在水流中的检出率更高。与人口密度较低的地区相比,位于人口密度较高地区的流域观察到较高的草皮和PMMoV浓度。在城市化地区上游未检测到病毒,证实了所选病毒指标的特异性。从这个意义上说,crAssphage和hav更适合监测受人类活动影响的溪流水体,而PMMoV则适合这两种基质。研究结果表明,这三种病毒有望成为追踪具有不同特征的水生基质中人类粪便污染的指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Food and Environmental Virology
Food and Environmental Virology ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-MICROBIOLOGY
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
35
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Food and Environmental Virology publishes original articles, notes and review articles on any aspect relating to the transmission of pathogenic viruses via the environment (water, air, soil etc.) and foods. This includes epidemiological studies, identification of novel or emerging pathogens, methods of analysis or characterisation, studies on survival and elimination, and development of procedural controls for industrial processes, e.g. HACCP plans. The journal will cover all aspects of this important area, and encompass studies on any human, animal, and plant pathogenic virus which is capable of transmission via the environment or food.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书