The financial viability of Australian private hospitals: a systematic review.

IF 1.4
Grzegorz Brylski, Shaun Larkin, Andrew Wilson
{"title":"The financial viability of Australian private hospitals: a systematic review.","authors":"Grzegorz Brylski, Shaun Larkin, Andrew Wilson","doi":"10.1071/AH25190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to synthesise Australian evidence on the determinants of private hospital financial viability and the implications for system performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a PRISMA-guided systematic review of English-language studies on Australia's mixed public-private system. Databases searched were PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and EconLit. Eligible publications analysed financial, policy, or operational factors affecting private hospitals. Data were extracted and synthesised using thematic analysis. Twenty-three publications met the inclusion criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five cross-cutting themes emerged. (1) Payment, pricing and fee transparency: fragmented schedules, out-of-pocket exposure, and contracting frictions weaken price signals and can erode margins. (2) Ownership, consolidation, and for-profit pressures: corporate and private-equity dynamics shape capital allocation, service mix, and bargaining power. (3) Insurance incentives and reforms: policy levers modestly influence demand and show limited impact on public waiting times, with mixed consequences for system efficiency. (4) Maternity, allied health, and pandemic disruptions: service lines with thin margins and workforce constraints are exposed to demand shocks and cost growth. (5) Consumer choice, emergency department usage, waiting times, and public-private overlaps: patient flows and portability influence revenue stability but create coordination challenges.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The sector remains valuable yet financially fragile. Improving price transparency, reforming payment models and contracting arrangements to better align with value-based principles, and deepening public-private partnerships could strengthen resilience. Targeted data on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples health and clearer outcome-price linkages are priorities for practice and policy.</p>","PeriodicalId":93891,"journal":{"name":"Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association","volume":"49 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/AH25190","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to synthesise Australian evidence on the determinants of private hospital financial viability and the implications for system performance.

Methods: We conducted a PRISMA-guided systematic review of English-language studies on Australia's mixed public-private system. Databases searched were PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and EconLit. Eligible publications analysed financial, policy, or operational factors affecting private hospitals. Data were extracted and synthesised using thematic analysis. Twenty-three publications met the inclusion criteria.

Results: Five cross-cutting themes emerged. (1) Payment, pricing and fee transparency: fragmented schedules, out-of-pocket exposure, and contracting frictions weaken price signals and can erode margins. (2) Ownership, consolidation, and for-profit pressures: corporate and private-equity dynamics shape capital allocation, service mix, and bargaining power. (3) Insurance incentives and reforms: policy levers modestly influence demand and show limited impact on public waiting times, with mixed consequences for system efficiency. (4) Maternity, allied health, and pandemic disruptions: service lines with thin margins and workforce constraints are exposed to demand shocks and cost growth. (5) Consumer choice, emergency department usage, waiting times, and public-private overlaps: patient flows and portability influence revenue stability but create coordination challenges.

Conclusions: The sector remains valuable yet financially fragile. Improving price transparency, reforming payment models and contracting arrangements to better align with value-based principles, and deepening public-private partnerships could strengthen resilience. Targeted data on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples health and clearer outcome-price linkages are priorities for practice and policy.

澳大利亚私立医院的财务可行性:系统回顾。
目的:本研究旨在综合澳大利亚证据对私立医院财务可行性的决定因素和影响系统性能。方法:我们对澳大利亚公私混合系统的英语研究进行了prism指导的系统回顾。检索的数据库包括PubMed、MEDLINE、Embase、Scopus和EconLit。合资格的出版物分析了影响私立医院的财务、政策或运营因素。利用专题分析提取和综合数据。23篇出版物符合纳入标准。结果:出现了五个交叉主题。(1)支付、定价和费用透明度:分散的时间表、自付风险和收缩摩擦削弱了价格信号,并可能侵蚀利润率。(2)所有权、整合和盈利压力:公司和私募股权的动态影响了资本配置、服务组合和议价能力。(3)保险激励和改革:政策杠杆对需求的影响不大,对公众等待时间的影响有限,对系统效率的影响好坏参半。(4)产妇、联合保健和流行病中断:利润微薄和劳动力限制的服务项目容易受到需求冲击和成本增长的影响。(5)消费者选择、急诊科使用、等待时间和公私重叠:患者流动和可移植性影响收入稳定性,但带来协调挑战。结论:该行业仍然有价值,但在财务上很脆弱。提高价格透明度、改革支付模式和合同安排以更好地与基于价值的原则保持一致,以及深化公私伙伴关系,都可以增强韧性。关于土著和托雷斯海峡岛民健康的有针对性的数据和更明确的结果-价格联系是实践和政策的优先事项。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书