Estimation and Comparison of Travel Burden to Outpatient, Opioid Treatment Program, and Residential Substance Use Disorder Treatment Programs.

Substance use & addiction journal Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-05 DOI:10.1177/29767342251370825
Marcus A Bachhuber, Chinazo O Cunningham, Pat Lincourt, Ashly E Jordan
{"title":"Estimation and Comparison of Travel Burden to Outpatient, Opioid Treatment Program, and Residential Substance Use Disorder Treatment Programs.","authors":"Marcus A Bachhuber, Chinazo O Cunningham, Pat Lincourt, Ashly E Jordan","doi":"10.1177/29767342251370825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transportation can be a significant access barrier to effective substance use disorder (SUD) treatment and potentially influence treatment decisions. We aimed to estimate and compare the travel time and cost for outpatient (3 visits/week), opioid treatment program (OTP, 3 visits/week), and residential treatment (1 visit).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For a 28-day period, we compared travel time and costs for SUD treatment programs using a cross-sectional geospatial analysis of New York State data (March 2024). We estimated travel times using public transit in New York City (NYC) and driving outside of NYC. We estimated travel costs using public transit fares and the standard mileage rate. For comparisons, we used population-weighted paired <i>t</i>-tests both statewide and within urbanicity categories (NYC, urban non-NYC, and rural).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Statewide, OTPs required the longest mean travel times (7.8 hours) and highest mean costs ($139.92), followed by outpatient treatment (4.4 hours, $80.15) and residential treatment (35.9 minutes, $9.28), with a similar pattern in each urbanicity category. In rural areas, compared with residential treatment, the mean travel time for outpatient treatment was longer by 7.44 hours (95% CI: 7.27, 7.61) and more costly by $206.47 (95% CI: 201.03, 211.90) and the mean travel time for OTPs was longer by 13.06 hours (95% CI: 12.75, 13.37) and more costly by $399.67 (95% CI: 388.36, 410.98). Further, in rural areas, compared with outpatient treatment, the mean travel time to OTPs was longer by 5.61 hours (95% CI: 5.32, 5.92) and more costly by $193.21 (95% CI: 181.98, 204.43).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Transportation burdens are significantly higher for outpatient treatment and OTPs compared with residential treatment, and for OTPs compared with outpatient treatment, especially in rural areas. Reducing travel time and cost through strategies including telehealth, flexible methadone take-home dosing, mobile medication units, and integration of methadone treatment into other outpatient programs are needed to improve accessibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":516535,"journal":{"name":"Substance use & addiction journal","volume":" ","pages":"556-563"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12628824/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance use & addiction journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/29767342251370825","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Transportation can be a significant access barrier to effective substance use disorder (SUD) treatment and potentially influence treatment decisions. We aimed to estimate and compare the travel time and cost for outpatient (3 visits/week), opioid treatment program (OTP, 3 visits/week), and residential treatment (1 visit).

Methods: For a 28-day period, we compared travel time and costs for SUD treatment programs using a cross-sectional geospatial analysis of New York State data (March 2024). We estimated travel times using public transit in New York City (NYC) and driving outside of NYC. We estimated travel costs using public transit fares and the standard mileage rate. For comparisons, we used population-weighted paired t-tests both statewide and within urbanicity categories (NYC, urban non-NYC, and rural).

Results: Statewide, OTPs required the longest mean travel times (7.8 hours) and highest mean costs ($139.92), followed by outpatient treatment (4.4 hours, $80.15) and residential treatment (35.9 minutes, $9.28), with a similar pattern in each urbanicity category. In rural areas, compared with residential treatment, the mean travel time for outpatient treatment was longer by 7.44 hours (95% CI: 7.27, 7.61) and more costly by $206.47 (95% CI: 201.03, 211.90) and the mean travel time for OTPs was longer by 13.06 hours (95% CI: 12.75, 13.37) and more costly by $399.67 (95% CI: 388.36, 410.98). Further, in rural areas, compared with outpatient treatment, the mean travel time to OTPs was longer by 5.61 hours (95% CI: 5.32, 5.92) and more costly by $193.21 (95% CI: 181.98, 204.43).

Conclusions: Transportation burdens are significantly higher for outpatient treatment and OTPs compared with residential treatment, and for OTPs compared with outpatient treatment, especially in rural areas. Reducing travel time and cost through strategies including telehealth, flexible methadone take-home dosing, mobile medication units, and integration of methadone treatment into other outpatient programs are needed to improve accessibility.

估计和比较门诊、阿片类药物治疗方案和住宅物质使用障碍治疗方案的旅行负担。
背景:交通可能是物质使用障碍(SUD)有效治疗的重要障碍,并可能影响治疗决策。我们的目的是估计和比较门诊(3次就诊/周)、阿片类药物治疗方案(OTP, 3次就诊/周)和住院治疗(1次就诊)的旅行时间和费用。方法:在28天的时间里,我们使用纽约州数据(2024年3月)的横断面地理空间分析,比较了SUD治疗方案的旅行时间和成本。我们估计了在纽约市(NYC)使用公共交通工具和在纽约市以外开车的旅行时间。我们使用公共交通票价和标准里程率来估算出行成本。为了进行比较,我们在全州和城市类别(纽约市、非纽约市城市和农村)内使用了人口加权配对t检验。结果:在全州范围内,OTPs需要最长的平均旅行时间(7.8小时)和最高的平均费用(139.92美元),其次是门诊治疗(4.4小时,80.15美元)和住院治疗(35.9分钟,9.28美元),每个城市类别的模式相似。在农村地区,与住院治疗相比,门诊治疗的平均旅行时间长7.44小时(95% CI: 7.27, 7.61),费用高206.47美元(95% CI: 201.03, 211.90), otp的平均旅行时间长13.06小时(95% CI: 12.75, 13.37),费用高399.67美元(95% CI: 388.36, 410.98)。此外,在农村地区,与门诊治疗相比,到OTPs的平均旅行时间要长5.61小时(95% CI: 5.32, 5.92),费用要贵193.21美元(95% CI: 181.98, 204.43)。结论:门诊和门诊的交通负担明显高于住院治疗,门诊和门诊的交通负担明显高于门诊,特别是在农村地区。为了提高可及性,需要通过远程医疗、灵活的美沙酮带回家给药、移动用药单元以及将美沙酮治疗纳入其他门诊方案等策略来减少旅行时间和成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书