Investigating the Correspondence between Accuracy, Confidence, and Metacognitive Insight for Olfactory Processing.

IF 2.1 4区 心理学 Q3 BIOPHYSICS
Beth F Longley, Mao Hsiang Hsiao, Barry C Smith, Sarah N Garfinkel
{"title":"Investigating the Correspondence between Accuracy, Confidence, and Metacognitive Insight for Olfactory Processing.","authors":"Beth F Longley, Mao Hsiang Hsiao, Barry C Smith, Sarah N Garfinkel","doi":"10.1163/22134808-bja10174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Olfaction is an important yet relatively often overlooked sense, relevant to cognition, emotion, mental health, and ageing. Research into sensory domains such as interoception indicates discrepancies between behaviourally assessed accuracy and self-report measures, such as confidence. Initial evidence suggests a similar discrepancy between behavioural and self-report measures may also be present for olfaction. This study employed a multidimensional framework to examine the relationships among behavioural accuracy, self-reported confidence, and metacognitive insight for olfactory processing, using the Sniffin' Sticks Test across three olfactory tasks: threshold, discrimination, and identification. Participants exhibited varying metacognitive insight into their olfactory performance, with insight being significantly lower for the threshold task. In a complementary analysis, accuracy and confidence were not related in the threshold task, but were aligned during both the discrimination and identification tasks. These results suggest that individuals who have the most sensitive olfactory threshold performance do not display corresponding high levels of confidence, supporting the finding of reduced insight for this type of olfactory task specifically. Across tasks, behavioural accuracy was related in all tasks, as was self-reported confidence. However, metacognitive insight was not associated across tasks. Together, these results highlight that metacognitive insight for olfactory ability may differ depending on the type of olfactory task. These initial findings require replication with alternative methods to account for differences in task performance, and further investigation to ascertain patterns of results in old age where there can be a decline in olfactory function. A more comprehensive understanding of olfactory processing across accuracy, self-report, and insight measures, across a range of different olfactory tests, may provide further insight into the relationship between specific aspects of olfactory ability and how these might relate to mental health and neurological conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":51298,"journal":{"name":"Multisensory Research","volume":" ","pages":"445-469"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multisensory Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/22134808-bja10174","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Olfaction is an important yet relatively often overlooked sense, relevant to cognition, emotion, mental health, and ageing. Research into sensory domains such as interoception indicates discrepancies between behaviourally assessed accuracy and self-report measures, such as confidence. Initial evidence suggests a similar discrepancy between behavioural and self-report measures may also be present for olfaction. This study employed a multidimensional framework to examine the relationships among behavioural accuracy, self-reported confidence, and metacognitive insight for olfactory processing, using the Sniffin' Sticks Test across three olfactory tasks: threshold, discrimination, and identification. Participants exhibited varying metacognitive insight into their olfactory performance, with insight being significantly lower for the threshold task. In a complementary analysis, accuracy and confidence were not related in the threshold task, but were aligned during both the discrimination and identification tasks. These results suggest that individuals who have the most sensitive olfactory threshold performance do not display corresponding high levels of confidence, supporting the finding of reduced insight for this type of olfactory task specifically. Across tasks, behavioural accuracy was related in all tasks, as was self-reported confidence. However, metacognitive insight was not associated across tasks. Together, these results highlight that metacognitive insight for olfactory ability may differ depending on the type of olfactory task. These initial findings require replication with alternative methods to account for differences in task performance, and further investigation to ascertain patterns of results in old age where there can be a decline in olfactory function. A more comprehensive understanding of olfactory processing across accuracy, self-report, and insight measures, across a range of different olfactory tests, may provide further insight into the relationship between specific aspects of olfactory ability and how these might relate to mental health and neurological conditions.

嗅觉加工的准确性、置信度和元认知洞察力之间的对应关系研究。
嗅觉是一种重要但往往被忽视的感觉,与认知、情感、心理健康和衰老有关。对内感受等感觉领域的研究表明,行为评估的准确性与自信等自我报告测量之间存在差异。初步证据表明,在嗅觉方面,行为和自我报告测量之间也可能存在类似的差异。本研究使用嗅探棒测试在三个嗅觉任务中:阈值、辨别和识别,采用一个多维框架来检验行为准确性、自我报告的自信和嗅觉处理的元认知洞察力之间的关系。参与者对他们的嗅觉表现表现出不同的元认知洞察力,在阈值任务中洞察力明显较低。在互补分析中,准确性和置信度在阈值任务中不相关,但在辨别和识别任务中都是一致的。这些结果表明,嗅觉阈值表现最敏感的个体并没有表现出相应的高水平的自信,这支持了对这类嗅觉任务的洞察力降低的发现。在不同的任务中,行为准确性与所有任务相关,自我报告的自信也是如此。然而,元认知洞察力在任务之间没有关联。总之,这些结果强调嗅觉能力的元认知洞察力可能会因嗅觉任务的类型而有所不同。这些初步发现需要用其他方法来解释任务表现的差异,并进一步调查以确定老年人嗅觉功能下降的结果模式。通过一系列不同的嗅觉测试,对嗅觉加工的准确性、自我报告和洞察力措施进行更全面的了解,可能会进一步深入了解嗅觉能力的特定方面之间的关系,以及这些方面与心理健康和神经系统状况的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Multisensory Research
Multisensory Research BIOPHYSICS-PSYCHOLOGY
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: Multisensory Research is an interdisciplinary archival journal covering all aspects of multisensory processing including the control of action, cognition and attention. Research using any approach to increase our understanding of multisensory perceptual, behavioural, neural and computational mechanisms is encouraged. Empirical, neurophysiological, psychophysical, brain imaging, clinical, developmental, mathematical and computational analyses are welcome. Research will also be considered covering multisensory applications such as sensory substitution, crossmodal methods for delivering sensory information or multisensory approaches to robotics and engineering. Short communications and technical notes that draw attention to new developments will be included, as will reviews and commentaries on current issues. Special issues dealing with specific topics will be announced from time to time. Multisensory Research is a continuation of Seeing and Perceiving, and of Spatial Vision.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书