A Narrative Review of Multimodal Data Fusion Strategies for Precision Risk Prediction in Coronary Artery Disease: Advances, Challenges, and Future Informatics Directions.

IF 2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Ziqiang Zhou, Jinwen Wang
{"title":"A Narrative Review of Multimodal Data Fusion Strategies for Precision Risk Prediction in Coronary Artery Disease: Advances, Challenges, and Future Informatics Directions.","authors":"Ziqiang Zhou, Jinwen Wang","doi":"10.5041/RMMJ.10558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Traditional coronary artery disease (CAD) risk scores offer limited precision, often failing to capture the complex, multifactorial nature of the disease. The proliferation of multimodal data from imaging, genomics, electronic health records (EHRs), and wearables offers a transformative opportunity for more individualized risk prediction. This narrative review systematically maps and critically evaluates the landscape of multimodal data fusion for CAD risk prediction. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we synthesized 39 empirical studies published from 2009 to 2025 to identify key methodological patterns, informatics challenges, and future directions. Our synthesis reveals consistent methodological patterns: (1) integrating imaging biomarkers (e.g. coronary computed tomography angiography, coronary artery calcium scoring) with clinical data robustly enhances risk discrimination and reclassification; (2) adding polygenic risk scores provides incremental value, typically via late-fusion models; and (3) leveraging longitudinal EHR data with machine learning captures dynamic risk trajectories, outperforming static scores. Advanced machine learning architectures, particularly deep and graph neural networks, are pivotal for enabling automated feature extraction and modeling complex cross-modal interactions. Despite these advances, significant informatics hurdles persist, including data heterogeneity, algorithmic bias, the need for robust external validation, and challenges in clinical workflow integration. Multimodal data fusion is a cornerstone of precision cardiology, but realizing its clinical potential requires a concerted focus on developing fair, interpretable, and scalable methodological frameworks to translate complex data into improved patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":46408,"journal":{"name":"Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal","volume":"16 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12591514/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5041/RMMJ.10558","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Traditional coronary artery disease (CAD) risk scores offer limited precision, often failing to capture the complex, multifactorial nature of the disease. The proliferation of multimodal data from imaging, genomics, electronic health records (EHRs), and wearables offers a transformative opportunity for more individualized risk prediction. This narrative review systematically maps and critically evaluates the landscape of multimodal data fusion for CAD risk prediction. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we synthesized 39 empirical studies published from 2009 to 2025 to identify key methodological patterns, informatics challenges, and future directions. Our synthesis reveals consistent methodological patterns: (1) integrating imaging biomarkers (e.g. coronary computed tomography angiography, coronary artery calcium scoring) with clinical data robustly enhances risk discrimination and reclassification; (2) adding polygenic risk scores provides incremental value, typically via late-fusion models; and (3) leveraging longitudinal EHR data with machine learning captures dynamic risk trajectories, outperforming static scores. Advanced machine learning architectures, particularly deep and graph neural networks, are pivotal for enabling automated feature extraction and modeling complex cross-modal interactions. Despite these advances, significant informatics hurdles persist, including data heterogeneity, algorithmic bias, the need for robust external validation, and challenges in clinical workflow integration. Multimodal data fusion is a cornerstone of precision cardiology, but realizing its clinical potential requires a concerted focus on developing fair, interpretable, and scalable methodological frameworks to translate complex data into improved patient outcomes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

冠状动脉疾病精确风险预测的多模态数据融合策略综述:进展、挑战和未来信息学方向
传统的冠状动脉疾病(CAD)风险评分精度有限,往往无法捕捉疾病的复杂性和多因素性质。来自影像、基因组学、电子健康记录(EHRs)和可穿戴设备的多模式数据的激增,为更个性化的风险预测提供了一个变革性的机会。这篇叙述性综述系统地绘制和批判性地评估了CAD风险预测的多模式数据融合的前景。根据系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目,我们综合了2009年至2025年发表的39项实证研究,以确定关键的方法模式、信息学挑战和未来方向。我们的综合研究揭示了一致的方法模式:(1)将成像生物标志物(如冠状动脉计算机断层血管造影、冠状动脉钙评分)与临床数据相结合,有力地增强了风险识别和重新分类;(2)增加多基因风险评分提供了增量价值,通常通过后期融合模型;(3)利用纵向电子病历数据和机器学习捕捉动态风险轨迹,优于静态得分。先进的机器学习架构,特别是深度和图形神经网络,对于实现自动化特征提取和复杂跨模态交互建模至关重要。尽管取得了这些进展,但重大的信息学障碍仍然存在,包括数据异质性、算法偏差、需要强大的外部验证以及临床工作流程集成方面的挑战。多模式数据融合是精确心脏病学的基石,但实现其临床潜力需要协调一致,重点发展公平、可解释和可扩展的方法框架,以将复杂的数据转化为改善的患者结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal
Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
55
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书