Postoperative Decrease in Volumetric Bone Mineral Density in Patients Undergoing Anterior or Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Stand-Alone Versus 360° Constructs.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Koki Tsuchiya, Ichiro Okano, Ali E Guven, Erika Chiapparelli, Paul Kohli, Jan Hambrecht, Gisberto Evangelisti, Marco D Burkhard, Jennifer Shue, Frank P Cammisa, Federico P Girardi, Andrew A Sama, Alexander P Hughes
{"title":"Postoperative Decrease in Volumetric Bone Mineral Density in Patients Undergoing Anterior or Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Stand-Alone Versus 360° Constructs.","authors":"Koki Tsuchiya, Ichiro Okano, Ali E Guven, Erika Chiapparelli, Paul Kohli, Jan Hambrecht, Gisberto Evangelisti, Marco D Burkhard, Jennifer Shue, Frank P Cammisa, Federico P Girardi, Andrew A Sama, Alexander P Hughes","doi":"10.1177/15563316251383476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Studies have shown that various types of spine surgery can be a contributing factor in bone loss, but the influence of lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LIF) on postoperative bone loss remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We sought to investigate the influence of spine surgery, measured by quantitative computed tomography (QCT), on the adjacent vertebrae, and to evaluate the bone loss between stand-alone LIF (SA-LIF) and LIF supplemented with posterior pedicle screw-rod fixation (360° constructs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective review of the records of patients who underwent SA-LIF and 360° constructs between 2016 and 2024. Inclusion criteria were (1) the interval between surgery and the secondary CT was 2 to 12 months; (2) the interval between the preoperative and postoperative CT was a minimum of 2 months; (3) the patient did not undergo additional spine surgery between those 2 CT scans; and (4) volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) measurements of 1 level above the upper vertebra (UV+1) were possible in all cases. We excluded levels with a corpectomy, planned staged surgery, more than 4 levels of fusion, and poor QCT imaging quality. Postoperative changes in vBMD in the vertebrae at UV+1, UV+2, and 1 level below the lower vertebra (LV-1) were measured. Pre- and postoperative vBMDs were compared. Postoperative vBMD changes were also compared between the 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 191 patients who underwent the anterior or lateral interbody fusion in the specified time period, 72 patients met our inclusion criteria (36 SA-LIF; 63.3 ± 15.1 years, 36 360° constructs; 58.6 ± 11.3 years). UV+1 and UV+2 showed significant decreases in the SA-LIF group, and UV+2 and LV-1 decreased significantly in the 360° group. In the ANCOVA adjusted for age, the percent change in vBMD at each adjacent level showed no significant difference between the 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both SA-LIF and 360°construct surgeries negatively affected the postoperative vBMD values at adjacent levels. There was no statistically significant difference in bone loss between the 2 groups, suggesting that additional surgical invasiveness caused by screw insertion may not affect the severity of postoperative bone loss.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III: retrospective cohort study.</p>","PeriodicalId":35357,"journal":{"name":"Hss Journal","volume":" ","pages":"15563316251383476"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12583017/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hss Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15563316251383476","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Studies have shown that various types of spine surgery can be a contributing factor in bone loss, but the influence of lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LIF) on postoperative bone loss remains unclear.

Purpose: We sought to investigate the influence of spine surgery, measured by quantitative computed tomography (QCT), on the adjacent vertebrae, and to evaluate the bone loss between stand-alone LIF (SA-LIF) and LIF supplemented with posterior pedicle screw-rod fixation (360° constructs).

Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of the records of patients who underwent SA-LIF and 360° constructs between 2016 and 2024. Inclusion criteria were (1) the interval between surgery and the secondary CT was 2 to 12 months; (2) the interval between the preoperative and postoperative CT was a minimum of 2 months; (3) the patient did not undergo additional spine surgery between those 2 CT scans; and (4) volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) measurements of 1 level above the upper vertebra (UV+1) were possible in all cases. We excluded levels with a corpectomy, planned staged surgery, more than 4 levels of fusion, and poor QCT imaging quality. Postoperative changes in vBMD in the vertebrae at UV+1, UV+2, and 1 level below the lower vertebra (LV-1) were measured. Pre- and postoperative vBMDs were compared. Postoperative vBMD changes were also compared between the 2 groups.

Results: Out of 191 patients who underwent the anterior or lateral interbody fusion in the specified time period, 72 patients met our inclusion criteria (36 SA-LIF; 63.3 ± 15.1 years, 36 360° constructs; 58.6 ± 11.3 years). UV+1 and UV+2 showed significant decreases in the SA-LIF group, and UV+2 and LV-1 decreased significantly in the 360° group. In the ANCOVA adjusted for age, the percent change in vBMD at each adjacent level showed no significant difference between the 2 groups.

Conclusion: Both SA-LIF and 360°construct surgeries negatively affected the postoperative vBMD values at adjacent levels. There was no statistically significant difference in bone loss between the 2 groups, suggesting that additional surgical invasiveness caused by screw insertion may not affect the severity of postoperative bone loss.

Level of evidence: Level III: retrospective cohort study.

前路或侧路腰椎椎体间融合术患者术后体积骨密度下降:独立与360°结构
背景:研究表明,各种类型的脊柱手术可能是导致骨丢失的一个因素,但腰椎侧位椎体间融合术(LIF)对术后骨丢失的影响尚不清楚。目的:我们试图通过定量计算机断层扫描(QCT)测量脊柱手术对邻近椎体的影响,并评估独立LIF (SA-LIF)和LIF补充后路椎弓根螺钉-棒固定(360°结构)之间的骨损失。方法:我们对2016年至2024年间接受SA-LIF和360°构建的患者进行了回顾性分析。纳入标准为(1)手术与二次CT检查间隔2 ~ 12个月;(2)术前术后CT间隔至少2个月;(3)患者在两次CT扫描之间没有进行额外的脊柱手术;(4)所有病例均可测量上椎体上方1个水平的体积骨密度(vBMD) (UV+1)。我们排除了椎体切除术、计划分阶段手术、融合超过4个节段和QCT成像质量差的节段。测量下椎体(LV-1)下UV+1、UV+2和1节段椎体vBMD的术后变化。比较术前和术后vBMDs。比较两组患者术后vBMD变化。结果:191例在规定时间内行前路或外侧椎体间融合的患者中,72例患者符合我们的纳入标准(36例SA-LIF; 63.3±15.1年;36例360°结构;58.6±11.3年)。UV+1和UV+2在SA-LIF组显著降低,UV+2和LV-1在360°组显著降低。在年龄调整后的ANCOVA中,两组之间每个相邻水平的vBMD百分比变化没有显着差异。结论:SA-LIF和360°构造手术对术后相邻节段vBMD值均有负面影响。两组间骨质流失的差异无统计学意义,提示置入螺钉造成的额外手术侵入可能不会影响术后骨质流失的严重程度。证据等级:III级:回顾性队列研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hss Journal
Hss Journal Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: The HSS Journal is the Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery. The aim of the HSS Journal is to promote cutting edge research, clinical pathways, and state-of-the-art techniques that inform and facilitate the continuing education of the orthopaedic and musculoskeletal communities. HSS Journal publishes articles that offer contributions to the advancement of the knowledge of musculoskeletal diseases and encourages submission of manuscripts from all musculoskeletal disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书