The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Responding to Patient Questions About Anterolateral Thigh Flap Surgery for Diabetic Foot Ulcers.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Journal of reconstructive microsurgery Pub Date : 2026-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-05 DOI:10.1055/a-2737-5287
Luke J Llaurado, Kishan S Shah, Isabel A Snee, Rachel N Rohrich, Ryan J Bender, Nicole C Episalla, Richard C Youn, Karen K Evans
{"title":"The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Responding to Patient Questions About Anterolateral Thigh Flap Surgery for Diabetic Foot Ulcers.","authors":"Luke J Llaurado, Kishan S Shah, Isabel A Snee, Rachel N Rohrich, Ryan J Bender, Nicole C Episalla, Richard C Youn, Karen K Evans","doi":"10.1055/a-2737-5287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) care represents a significant challenge in plastic and reconstructive surgery. Oftentimes, patients encounter complex articles and websites to answer questions about their surgeries, including anterolateral thigh (ALT) flaps. Artificial intelligence (AI) represents a new and simplified resource for DFU patients seeking information regarding their care. To assess ChatGPT's utility as a patient resource, we evaluated the accuracy, comprehensiveness, and safety of AI-generated responses to frequently asked questions (FAQs) related to ALT flap surgery for DFU.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten DFU and ALT flap care FAQs were posed to ChatGPT Model 3.5 in June 2024. Four plastic surgeons evaluated responses using a 10-point Likert scale for accuracy, comprehensiveness, and danger of ChatGPT's answers. Surgeons also provided qualitative feedback. Response readability was assessed using 10 readability indexes, averaged to produce a reading grade level for each response.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, ChatGPT answered patient questions with a mean accuracy of 9.1 ± 1.2, comprehensiveness of 8.2 ± 1.5, and danger of 2.0 ± 1.0. ChatGPT answered at a mean grade level of 19.8 ± 20.1. Qualitatively, physician reviewers complimented the organizational clarity of the responses (<i>n</i> = 4/10) and the AI's ability to provide information on possible surgical complications (<i>n</i> = 4/10). While one response was noted to present explicitly incorrect information about preoperative preparation protocols and when they should be initiated, the majority of responses (<i>n</i> = 6/10) left out key postoperative information, notably dangle protocols and compression.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ChatGPT provides accurate and comprehensive responses to FAQs related to patients undergoing ALT flap surgery for the treatment of DFUs. The AI-generated responses were praised for organizational clarity and informative content regarding surgical complications, but lacked essential postoperative care details. Therefore, while ChatGPT is a valuable informational tool, further refinement is necessary to ensure that fully comprehensive information is provided to DFU patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":16949,"journal":{"name":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","volume":" ","pages":"810-817"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2737-5287","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) care represents a significant challenge in plastic and reconstructive surgery. Oftentimes, patients encounter complex articles and websites to answer questions about their surgeries, including anterolateral thigh (ALT) flaps. Artificial intelligence (AI) represents a new and simplified resource for DFU patients seeking information regarding their care. To assess ChatGPT's utility as a patient resource, we evaluated the accuracy, comprehensiveness, and safety of AI-generated responses to frequently asked questions (FAQs) related to ALT flap surgery for DFU.

Methods: Ten DFU and ALT flap care FAQs were posed to ChatGPT Model 3.5 in June 2024. Four plastic surgeons evaluated responses using a 10-point Likert scale for accuracy, comprehensiveness, and danger of ChatGPT's answers. Surgeons also provided qualitative feedback. Response readability was assessed using 10 readability indexes, averaged to produce a reading grade level for each response.

Results: Overall, ChatGPT answered patient questions with a mean accuracy of 9.1 ± 1.2, comprehensiveness of 8.2 ± 1.5, and danger of 2.0 ± 1.0. ChatGPT answered at a mean grade level of 19.8 ± 20.1. Qualitatively, physician reviewers complimented the organizational clarity of the responses (n = 4/10) and the AI's ability to provide information on possible surgical complications (n = 4/10). While one response was noted to present explicitly incorrect information about preoperative preparation protocols and when they should be initiated, the majority of responses (n = 6/10) left out key postoperative information, notably dangle protocols and compression.

Conclusion: ChatGPT provides accurate and comprehensive responses to FAQs related to patients undergoing ALT flap surgery for the treatment of DFUs. The AI-generated responses were praised for organizational clarity and informative content regarding surgical complications, but lacked essential postoperative care details. Therefore, while ChatGPT is a valuable informational tool, further refinement is necessary to ensure that fully comprehensive information is provided to DFU patients.

人工智能在糖尿病足溃疡大腿前外侧皮瓣手术患者问题回答中的应用
背景:糖尿病足溃疡(DFU)的护理是整形和重建外科的一个重大挑战。通常情况下,患者会遇到复杂的文章和网站来回答关于他们的手术的问题,包括前外侧大腿(ALT)皮瓣。人工智能(AI)为DFU患者寻求有关其护理的信息提供了一种新的简化资源。为了评估ChatGPT作为患者资源的效用,我们评估了人工智能生成的与DFU ALT皮瓣手术相关的常见问题(FAQs)回答的准确性、全全性和安全性。方法:于2024年6月对10个DFU和ALT皮瓣护理常见问题进行ChatGPT模型3.5求解。四名整形外科医生使用10分李克特量表评估ChatGPT答案的准确性、全面性和危险性。外科医生也提供了定性反馈。回答的可读性使用10个可读性指数进行评估,平均得出每个回答的阅读等级水平。结果:总体而言,ChatGPT回答患者问题的平均准确率为9.1±1.2,全面性为8.2±1.5,危险性为2.0±1.0。ChatGPT回答的平均等级水平为19.8±20.1。从质量上讲,医生审稿人称赞了反应的组织清晰度(n=4/10)和人工智能提供可能的手术并发症信息的能力(n=4/10)。虽然注意到有1个应答在术前准备方案和何时启动方面提供了明确错误的信息,但大多数应答(n=6/10)遗漏了关键的术后信息,特别是悬吊方案和压缩。结论:ChatGPT对行ALT皮瓣手术治疗DFUs患者的常见问题提供了准确、全面的回答。人工智能生成的回复因组织清晰和关于手术并发症的信息内容而受到称赞,但缺乏必要的术后护理细节。因此,虽然ChatGPT是一个有价值的信息工具,但需要进一步完善,以确保为DFU患者提供全面的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
28.60%
发文量
80
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery is a peer-reviewed, indexed journal that provides an international forum for the publication of articles focusing on reconstructive microsurgery and complex reconstructive surgery. The journal was originally established in 1984 for the microsurgical community to publish and share academic papers. The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery provides the latest in original research spanning basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations. Review papers cover current topics in complex reconstruction and microsurgery. In addition, special sections discuss new technologies, innovations, materials, and significant problem cases. The journal welcomes controversial topics, editorial comments, book reviews, and letters to the Editor, in order to complete the balanced spectrum of information available in the Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery. All articles undergo stringent peer review by international experts in the specialty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书