Efficacy and Safety of Rezafungin Versus Caspofungin for the Treatment of Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis in a China Cohort of a Double-Blind, Randomised, Phase 3 Trial (ReSTORE China).
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Rezafungin Versus Caspofungin for the Treatment of Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis in a China Cohort of a Double-Blind, Randomised, Phase 3 Trial (ReSTORE China).","authors":"Haihui Huang, Sizhou Feng, Yunsong Yu, Yong Zhang, Yuan Yuan, Laura Cox, Yingyuan Zhang","doi":"10.1111/myc.70122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The global double-blind, randomised, Phase 3 ReSTORE trial (NCT03667690) demonstrated noninferiority of rezafungin versus caspofungin for all-cause mortality at Day 30 and global cure at Day 14 in patients with candidemia and/or invasive candidiasis.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We report outcomes for patients from China (ReSTORE China), comprising participants enrolled in the original ReSTORE trial (n = 11) and from an extended, China-only phase (n = 47) implemented to fulfill Chinese regulatory requirements.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with candidemia/invasive candidiasis were randomised 1:1 to intravenous rezafungin (400 mg loading, then 200 mg once weekly) or caspofungin (70 mg loading, then 50 mg once daily) for ≤ 4 weeks. Primary endpoints were all-cause mortality at Day 30 and global cure at Day 14 in the modified intent-to-treat population. Between October 2018 and March 2024, 58 patients were randomised and received study treatment (rezafungin n = 28 [modified intent-to-treat n = 27], caspofungin n = 30 [modified intent-to-treat n = 28]).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All-cause mortality at Day 30 was 33.3% (9/27) for rezafungin versus 35.7% (10/28) for caspofungin (difference -2.4% [95% confidence interval -27.0-22.6]). Global cure at Day 14 was 48.1% (13/27) versus 46.4% (13/28), respectively (weighted difference 0.3% [95% confidence interval -25.4-26.3]). Day 5 and 14 mycological eradication rates were 70.4% and 63.0% for rezafungin versus 71.4% and 67.9% for caspofungin, respectively. Safety and tolerability profiles were similar between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Rezafungin demonstrated similar efficacy and safety to caspofungin in the ReSTORE China cohort. These findings support the primary ReSTORE analysis and suggest that rezafungin could provide a new treatment option for candidemia/invasive candidiasis in China.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03667690.</p>","PeriodicalId":18797,"journal":{"name":"Mycoses","volume":"68 11","pages":"e70122"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12589930/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mycoses","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/myc.70122","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The global double-blind, randomised, Phase 3 ReSTORE trial (NCT03667690) demonstrated noninferiority of rezafungin versus caspofungin for all-cause mortality at Day 30 and global cure at Day 14 in patients with candidemia and/or invasive candidiasis.
Objectives: We report outcomes for patients from China (ReSTORE China), comprising participants enrolled in the original ReSTORE trial (n = 11) and from an extended, China-only phase (n = 47) implemented to fulfill Chinese regulatory requirements.
Methods: Patients with candidemia/invasive candidiasis were randomised 1:1 to intravenous rezafungin (400 mg loading, then 200 mg once weekly) or caspofungin (70 mg loading, then 50 mg once daily) for ≤ 4 weeks. Primary endpoints were all-cause mortality at Day 30 and global cure at Day 14 in the modified intent-to-treat population. Between October 2018 and March 2024, 58 patients were randomised and received study treatment (rezafungin n = 28 [modified intent-to-treat n = 27], caspofungin n = 30 [modified intent-to-treat n = 28]).
Results: All-cause mortality at Day 30 was 33.3% (9/27) for rezafungin versus 35.7% (10/28) for caspofungin (difference -2.4% [95% confidence interval -27.0-22.6]). Global cure at Day 14 was 48.1% (13/27) versus 46.4% (13/28), respectively (weighted difference 0.3% [95% confidence interval -25.4-26.3]). Day 5 and 14 mycological eradication rates were 70.4% and 63.0% for rezafungin versus 71.4% and 67.9% for caspofungin, respectively. Safety and tolerability profiles were similar between groups.
Conclusions: Rezafungin demonstrated similar efficacy and safety to caspofungin in the ReSTORE China cohort. These findings support the primary ReSTORE analysis and suggest that rezafungin could provide a new treatment option for candidemia/invasive candidiasis in China.
期刊介绍：
The journal Mycoses provides an international forum for original papers in English on the pathogenesis, diagnosis, therapy, prophylaxis, and epidemiology of fungal infectious diseases in humans as well as on the biology of pathogenic fungi.
Medical mycology as part of medical microbiology is advancing rapidly. Effective therapeutic strategies are already available in chemotherapy and are being further developed. Their application requires reliable laboratory diagnostic techniques, which, in turn, result from mycological basic research. Opportunistic mycoses vary greatly in their clinical and pathological symptoms, because the underlying disease of a patient at risk decisively determines their symptomatology and progress. The journal Mycoses is therefore of interest to scientists in fundamental mycological research, mycological laboratory diagnosticians and clinicians interested in fungal infections.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
