The Role of Laparoscopic Triage in the Management of Advanced Ovarian Cancer: A Review of Literature.

IF 1.1 Q4 SURGERY
Chirurgia Pub Date : 2025-10-01 DOI:10.21614/chirurgia.3200
Mariam Dalaty, Mihnea-Andrei Nicodin, Ovidiu-Vasile Nicodin, Lucian Puşcaà Iu, Mihai Emil Căpîlnă
{"title":"The Role of Laparoscopic Triage in the Management of Advanced Ovarian Cancer: A Review of Literature.","authors":"Mariam Dalaty, Mihnea-Andrei Nicodin, Ovidiu-Vasile Nicodin, Lucian Puşcaà Iu, Mihai Emil Căpîlnă","doi":"10.21614/chirurgia.3200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Advanced ovarian cancer is frequently diagnosed at late stages, necessitating precise and individualized treatment strategies. Surgical cytoreduction remains the cornerstone of treatment, with complete macroscopic tumor resection offering the best survival outcomes. However, accurately assessing resectability remains a major challenge. This review aims to evaluate the role of staging laparoscopy in triaging patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer, with a focus on its utility in determining surgical resectability and guiding treatment pathways. Emphasis was placed on predictive scoring systems: clinical scores (Suidan score), operative scores (Fagotti, PCI, Eisenkop) and postoperative scores (Aletti). Laparoscopic triage has shown greater predictive accuracy than traditional imaging in evaluating tumor resectability. Scoring systems such as the Fagotti and the Peritoneal Cancer Index provide validated intraoperative frameworks. International guidelines, such as ESMO, ESGO, NCCN, and ASCO, support laparoscopy for preoperative assessment, although its implementation remains limited in some countries, including Romania. Challenges include the lack of standardization, restricted access to advanced laparoscopic infrastructure, and the risk of port-site metastases. Staging laparoscopy is a valuable tool in the management of advanced ovarian cancer, aiding in the selection of optimal treatment strategies. Future integration of radiomics, artificial intelligence, and molecular profiling holds promise for fully personalized patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":10171,"journal":{"name":"Chirurgia","volume":"120 5","pages":"511-518"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chirurgia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21614/chirurgia.3200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Advanced ovarian cancer is frequently diagnosed at late stages, necessitating precise and individualized treatment strategies. Surgical cytoreduction remains the cornerstone of treatment, with complete macroscopic tumor resection offering the best survival outcomes. However, accurately assessing resectability remains a major challenge. This review aims to evaluate the role of staging laparoscopy in triaging patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer, with a focus on its utility in determining surgical resectability and guiding treatment pathways. Emphasis was placed on predictive scoring systems: clinical scores (Suidan score), operative scores (Fagotti, PCI, Eisenkop) and postoperative scores (Aletti). Laparoscopic triage has shown greater predictive accuracy than traditional imaging in evaluating tumor resectability. Scoring systems such as the Fagotti and the Peritoneal Cancer Index provide validated intraoperative frameworks. International guidelines, such as ESMO, ESGO, NCCN, and ASCO, support laparoscopy for preoperative assessment, although its implementation remains limited in some countries, including Romania. Challenges include the lack of standardization, restricted access to advanced laparoscopic infrastructure, and the risk of port-site metastases. Staging laparoscopy is a valuable tool in the management of advanced ovarian cancer, aiding in the selection of optimal treatment strategies. Future integration of radiomics, artificial intelligence, and molecular profiling holds promise for fully personalized patient care.

腹腔镜分诊在晚期卵巢癌治疗中的作用:文献综述。
晚期卵巢癌经常在晚期被诊断出来,需要精确和个性化的治疗策略。手术细胞减少仍然是治疗的基石,完全的肉眼肿瘤切除提供了最好的生存结果。然而,准确评估可切除性仍然是一个重大挑战。本综述旨在评估腹腔镜分期在晚期上皮性卵巢癌患者分诊中的作用,重点是其在确定手术可切除性和指导治疗途径方面的应用。重点放在预测评分系统:临床评分(Suidan评分)、手术评分(Fagotti、PCI、Eisenkop)和术后评分(Aletti)。在评估肿瘤可切除性方面,腹腔镜分诊显示出比传统影像学更高的预测准确性。Fagotti和腹膜癌指数等评分系统提供了有效的术中框架。国际指南,如ESMO、ESGO、NCCN和ASCO,支持腹腔镜术前评估,尽管其在一些国家(包括罗马尼亚)的实施仍然有限。挑战包括缺乏标准化,限制获得先进的腹腔镜基础设施,以及港口转移的风险。腹腔镜分期在晚期卵巢癌的治疗中是一种有价值的工具,有助于选择最佳的治疗策略。放射组学、人工智能和分子分析的未来整合有望实现完全个性化的患者护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chirurgia
Chirurgia Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
75
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Chirurgia is a bimonthly journal. In Chirurgia, original papers in the area of general surgery which neither appeared, nor were sent for publication in other periodicals, can be published. You can send original articles, new surgical techniques, or comprehensive general reports on surgical topics, clinical case presentations and, depending on publication space, - reviews of some articles of general interest to surgeons from other publications. Chirurgia is also a place for sharing information about the activity of various branches of the Romanian Society of Surgery, information on Congresses and Symposiums organized by the Romanian Society of Surgery and participation notes in other scientific meetings. Letters to the editor: Letters commenting on papers published in Chirurgia are welcomed. They should contain substantive ideas and commentaries supported by appropriate data, and should not exceed 2 pages. Please submit these letters to the editor through our online system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书