Histopathological Profile of Prostatic Lesions and the Role of Gleason Score in Surgical Treatment Decision-Making.

IF 1.1 Q4 SURGERY
Chirurgia Pub Date : 2025-10-01 DOI:10.21614/chirurgia.3212
Mihai-Cătălin Roşu, Cristina Anita Ionescu, Manuela Enciu, Bogdan Cã Mpineanu, Mihaela Pundiche, Nicolae Dobrin, Ionuà Iorga, Mariana Deacu, Oana Cojocaru, Ionuţ Burlacu, Miruna-Gabriela Vizireanu, Anca Chisoi, Ionuţ Poinareanu, Lucian Cristian Petcu
{"title":"Histopathological Profile of Prostatic Lesions and the Role of Gleason Score in Surgical Treatment Decision-Making.","authors":"Mihai-Cătălin Roşu, Cristina Anita Ionescu, Manuela Enciu, Bogdan Cã Mpineanu, Mihaela Pundiche, Nicolae Dobrin, Ionuà Iorga, Mariana Deacu, Oana Cojocaru, Ionuţ Burlacu, Miruna-Gabriela Vizireanu, Anca Chisoi, Ionuţ Poinareanu, Lucian Cristian Petcu","doi":"10.21614/chirurgia.3212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> The Gleason score plays a key role in risk stratification and surgical treatment selection for prostate cancer. This study evaluates the correlation between Gleason score, patient age, and tumor aggressiveness, with implications for medical practice. \n<b>Methods:</b> This retrospective study included 215 patients from Sf. Apostol Andrei Clinical Emergency Hospital of Constanta County (2023-2024) with histopathologically confirmed prostate lesions. Demographic variables (age), Gleason score (classified according to ISUP 2019), and histological grade were analyzed. Data were statistically analyzed using t tests, ANOVA, and logistic regression. While international guidelines provide a standardized framework for management, local and regional variations in healthcare access, diagnostic pathways, and patient preferences significantly influence real-world clinical practice. This study aims to describe the histopathological spectrum of prostatic lesions and evaluate the prognostic relevance of the Gleason score in surgical decision-making within the specific context of a Romanian tertiary care center. By highlighting regional particularities, such as the high burden of aggressive disease and the challenges in implementing active surveillance, our findings contribute to a more nuanced understanding of global prostate cancer care. \n<b>Results:</b> Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) accounted for 42.8% of cases, PCa for 44.7%, and urothelial carcinoma for 8.4%. Among prostate cancers, 87.5% had clinically significant disease (Gleason >=7), with 29.2% high-risk (Gleason 8-10). Gleason 7 was most frequent (58.3%), predominantly 3+4. A significant correlation was observed between advanced age ( >70 years) and tumor aggressiveness (OR = 2.3; 95% CI: 1.4-3.8). Radical prostatectomy was primarily chosen for Gleason scores >=7, with higher complication rates in older patients. \n<b>Conclusions:</b> Advanced age and a high Gleason score are independent factors of tumor aggressiveness. Early surgical intervention in patients with Gleason >=7 improves oncological outcomes. Integrating histopathology with multiparametric MRI and molecular biomarkers could optimize management of these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":10171,"journal":{"name":"Chirurgia","volume":"120 5","pages":"593-602"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chirurgia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21614/chirurgia.3212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The Gleason score plays a key role in risk stratification and surgical treatment selection for prostate cancer. This study evaluates the correlation between Gleason score, patient age, and tumor aggressiveness, with implications for medical practice. Methods: This retrospective study included 215 patients from Sf. Apostol Andrei Clinical Emergency Hospital of Constanta County (2023-2024) with histopathologically confirmed prostate lesions. Demographic variables (age), Gleason score (classified according to ISUP 2019), and histological grade were analyzed. Data were statistically analyzed using t tests, ANOVA, and logistic regression. While international guidelines provide a standardized framework for management, local and regional variations in healthcare access, diagnostic pathways, and patient preferences significantly influence real-world clinical practice. This study aims to describe the histopathological spectrum of prostatic lesions and evaluate the prognostic relevance of the Gleason score in surgical decision-making within the specific context of a Romanian tertiary care center. By highlighting regional particularities, such as the high burden of aggressive disease and the challenges in implementing active surveillance, our findings contribute to a more nuanced understanding of global prostate cancer care. Results: Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) accounted for 42.8% of cases, PCa for 44.7%, and urothelial carcinoma for 8.4%. Among prostate cancers, 87.5% had clinically significant disease (Gleason >=7), with 29.2% high-risk (Gleason 8-10). Gleason 7 was most frequent (58.3%), predominantly 3+4. A significant correlation was observed between advanced age ( >70 years) and tumor aggressiveness (OR = 2.3; 95% CI: 1.4-3.8). Radical prostatectomy was primarily chosen for Gleason scores >=7, with higher complication rates in older patients. Conclusions: Advanced age and a high Gleason score are independent factors of tumor aggressiveness. Early surgical intervention in patients with Gleason >=7 improves oncological outcomes. Integrating histopathology with multiparametric MRI and molecular biomarkers could optimize management of these patients.

前列腺病变的组织病理学特征及Gleason评分在手术治疗决策中的作用。
Gleason评分在前列腺癌的风险分层和手术治疗选择中起着关键作用。本研究评估Gleason评分、患者年龄和肿瘤侵袭性之间的相关性,并对医疗实践具有指导意义。方法:本回顾性研究纳入215例Sf患者。康斯坦察县Apostol Andrei临床急诊医院(2023-2024),组织病理学证实前列腺病变。分析人口统计学变量(年龄)、Gleason评分(根据ISUP 2019分类)和组织学分级。数据采用t检验、方差分析和逻辑回归进行统计分析。虽然国际准则为管理提供了标准化框架,但当地和地区在医疗保健获取、诊断途径和患者偏好方面的差异显著影响着现实世界的临床实践。本研究旨在描述前列腺病变的组织病理学谱,并在罗马尼亚三级护理中心的特定背景下评估格里森评分在手术决策中的预后相关性。通过强调区域特殊性,如侵袭性疾病的高负担和实施主动监测的挑战,我们的研究结果有助于更细致地了解全球前列腺癌护理。结果:良性前列腺增生占42.8%,前列腺癌占44.7%,尿路上皮癌占8.4%。在前列腺癌中,87.5%有临床显著性病变(Gleason Ãⅱ?Â¥7),高风险29.2% (Gleason 8â?”10)。Gleason 7最常见(58.3%),以3+4型为主。高龄(70岁)与肿瘤侵袭性之间存在显著相关性(OR = 2.3; 95% CI: 1.4-3.8)。根治性前列腺切除术主要选择Gleason评分â?Â¥7,老年患者并发症发生率较高。结论:高龄和高格里森评分是影响肿瘤侵袭性的独立因素。Gleason患者的早期手术干预Ãⅱ?Â¥7改善肿瘤预后。将组织病理学与多参数MRI和分子生物标志物相结合可以优化这些患者的管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chirurgia
Chirurgia Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
75
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Chirurgia is a bimonthly journal. In Chirurgia, original papers in the area of general surgery which neither appeared, nor were sent for publication in other periodicals, can be published. You can send original articles, new surgical techniques, or comprehensive general reports on surgical topics, clinical case presentations and, depending on publication space, - reviews of some articles of general interest to surgeons from other publications. Chirurgia is also a place for sharing information about the activity of various branches of the Romanian Society of Surgery, information on Congresses and Symposiums organized by the Romanian Society of Surgery and participation notes in other scientific meetings. Letters to the editor: Letters commenting on papers published in Chirurgia are welcomed. They should contain substantive ideas and commentaries supported by appropriate data, and should not exceed 2 pages. Please submit these letters to the editor through our online system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书