The Effect of Defect Morphology and Membrane Fixation on 3D Graft Material Displacement During Primary Wound Closure in Horizontal Bone Augmentation—An Ex Vivo Study

IF 5.9 1区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Clinical Oral Implants Research Pub Date : 2026-03-10 Epub Date: 2025-11-05 DOI:10.1111/clr.70072
Clemens Raabe, Emilio A. Cafferata, Wenjie Zhou, Katharina M. Müller, Neelam Lingwal, Ausra Ramanauskaite, Frank Schwarz, Emilio Couso-Queiruga
{"title":"The Effect of Defect Morphology and Membrane Fixation on 3D Graft Material Displacement During Primary Wound Closure in Horizontal Bone Augmentation—An Ex Vivo Study","authors":"Clemens Raabe,&nbsp;Emilio A. Cafferata,&nbsp;Wenjie Zhou,&nbsp;Katharina M. Müller,&nbsp;Neelam Lingwal,&nbsp;Ausra Ramanauskaite,&nbsp;Frank Schwarz,&nbsp;Emilio Couso-Queiruga","doi":"10.1111/clr.70072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>This preclinical study evaluated the influence of two defect morphologies on graft material displacement (GMD) during primary wound closure in horizontal bone augmentation (HBA). Secondary aims included assessing the effect of membrane stabilization and the role of local soft tissue characteristics on GMD.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Standardized HBA procedures following guided bone regeneration principles were performed on fresh pig hemimandibles. Each mandible received two sequential HBAs, randomized for defect morphology—partially contained (PCD) vs. contained (CD)—and membrane stabilization with (+Pins) or without (−Pins) four fixation pins. GMD was assessed using cone-beam computed tomography and intraoral scanning by comparing graft dimensions before and after wound closure, at nine levels from the implant platform and across nine delimited sections, respectively.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Sixty HBA procedures were analyzed. A notable GMD was observed for both PCD and CD, with no significant differences between them. In contrast, membrane stabilization significantly reduced three-dimensional GMD across all sections, with the most pronounced effect in the central-crestal section (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). At the implant platform level, GMD was −15.8% ± 25.6% with pins vs. −38.1% ± 27.4% without pins (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Across all groups, GMD occurred in an apico-lateral direction, with the greatest volume loss in the central-crestal, mesial, and distal crestal sections. Soft tissue phenotype did not affect GMD (<i>p</i> ≥ 0.240).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Defect morphology did not significantly influence the notable apico-lateral GMD. However, membrane stabilization using pins effectively reduced graft displacement, minimizing movement during primary wound closure.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10455,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Implants Research","volume":"37 3","pages":"314-326"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/clr.70072","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oral Implants Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/clr.70072","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

This preclinical study evaluated the influence of two defect morphologies on graft material displacement (GMD) during primary wound closure in horizontal bone augmentation (HBA). Secondary aims included assessing the effect of membrane stabilization and the role of local soft tissue characteristics on GMD.

Materials and Methods

Standardized HBA procedures following guided bone regeneration principles were performed on fresh pig hemimandibles. Each mandible received two sequential HBAs, randomized for defect morphology—partially contained (PCD) vs. contained (CD)—and membrane stabilization with (+Pins) or without (−Pins) four fixation pins. GMD was assessed using cone-beam computed tomography and intraoral scanning by comparing graft dimensions before and after wound closure, at nine levels from the implant platform and across nine delimited sections, respectively.

Results

Sixty HBA procedures were analyzed. A notable GMD was observed for both PCD and CD, with no significant differences between them. In contrast, membrane stabilization significantly reduced three-dimensional GMD across all sections, with the most pronounced effect in the central-crestal section (p < 0.001). At the implant platform level, GMD was −15.8% ± 25.6% with pins vs. −38.1% ± 27.4% without pins (p < 0.001). Across all groups, GMD occurred in an apico-lateral direction, with the greatest volume loss in the central-crestal, mesial, and distal crestal sections. Soft tissue phenotype did not affect GMD (p ≥ 0.240).

Conclusion

Defect morphology did not significantly influence the notable apico-lateral GMD. However, membrane stabilization using pins effectively reduced graft displacement, minimizing movement during primary wound closure.

Abstract Image

缺损形态和膜固定对水平骨增强术创面闭合过程中三维移植材料位移的影响——一项离体研究
目的:本临床前研究评估了水平骨增强术(HBA)初级伤口愈合过程中两种缺损形态对移植物材料位移(GMD)的影响。次要目的包括评估膜稳定的效果和局部软组织特征在GMD中的作用。材料和方法在猪半下颌骨上进行标准化HBA程序,遵循指导性骨再生原则。每个下颌骨接受两个连续的HBAs,根据缺陷形态随机分配-部分包含(PCD)或包含(CD) -膜稳定使用(+Pins)或不使用(- Pins)四个固定销。GMD的评估采用锥形束计算机断层扫描和口内扫描,通过比较伤口愈合前后、种植体平台的9个水平和9个划定的切片的移植物尺寸。结果对60例HBA程序进行了分析。PCD和CD均有显著的GMD,两者之间无显著差异。相反,膜稳定显著降低了所有部分的三维GMD,在中央-嵴部分效果最为显著(p < 0.001)。在种植体平台水平,有固定钉的GMD为- 15.8%±25.6%,没有固定钉的GMD为- 38.1%±27.4% (p < 0.001)。在所有的组中,GMD发生在顶侧方向,最大的体积损失发生在中央-嵴、中部和远端嵴部分。软组织表型不影响GMD (p≥0.240)。结论缺损形态对显著的顶侧GMD无显著影响。然而,膜稳定使用针有效地减少移植物位移,减少运动在初级伤口愈合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Oral Implants Research
Clinical Oral Implants Research 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
11.60%
发文量
149
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Oral Implants Research conveys scientific progress in the field of implant dentistry and its related areas to clinicians, teachers and researchers concerned with the application of this information for the benefit of patients in need of oral implants. The journal addresses itself to clinicians, general practitioners, periodontists, oral and maxillofacial surgeons and prosthodontists, as well as to teachers, academicians and scholars involved in the education of professionals and in the scientific promotion of the field of implant dentistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书